Dissection separation and an increase in sample availability

[MylieDaniels]

Summary

Infrastructure "Dissection tables separate from harvest tables, and relevant monsters dissect to samples"

Purpose of change

Dissection required a permutation of tables. For example, multiple harvest entries different only in dissection sample existed for furred mammals. Additionally, most relevant monsters didn't drop a reasonable amount of samples.

Describe the solution

Most non-zombified monsters dissect to a sample, all samples now exist, a set of tables for those samples exist, and dissect is a separate entry from harvest.
Adds a couple new monsters to lacking categories.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Testing

Disssected and butchered enemies that have samples, bionics and no dissection drop.

Additional context

[github-actions]

Spell checker encountered unrecognized words in the in-game text added in this pull request. See below for details.

Click to expand

• deathrattle serpent
• deathrattle serpents

This alert is automatically generated. You can simply disregard if this is inaccurate, or (optionally) you can also add the new words to tools/spell_checker/dictionary.txt so they will not trigger an alert next time.

[Maleclypse]

Alphabetizing mutagen_ingredients.json makes it harder to review but I didn't find any issues up through that file. I'll try and finish reviewing tonight.

[LyleSY]

This creates an opportunity to do a much bigger DinoMod harvest overhaul since a bunch of stuff was duplicated for CBM purposes, but I'll handle that with a follow up PR. Good stuff!

[Maleclypse]

Going through Insect I wasn't sure what method you used to determine how many samples a given creature gave. Was it weight, hp, danger, or some other method you used? Would you be able to include in the documentation some general guidelines as to how to decide what size of the sample's a given creature should drop? If it's all by feel no sense in writing any documentation but I wanted to check in case.

[Maleclypse]

Aftershock and vanilla look good, I had a questions in a couple of places. This is very excellent. Thank you!

[MylieDaniels]

Going through Insect I wasn't sure what method you used to determine how many samples a given creature gave. Was it weight, hp, danger, or some other method you used? Would you be able to include in the documentation some general guidelines as to how to decide what size of the sample's a given creature should drop? If it's all by feel no sense in writing any documentation but I wanted to check in case.

It's by feel and a combination of all of them along with other sources of sample availability and mutation category rarity, I don't think there's a way to consistently document it. I was aiming for a balance of attainability versus how "normal" the mutation category is, more than a strict rubric of size -> sample count or similar methods.

[Maleclypse]

Going through Insect I wasn't sure what method you used to determine how many samples a given creature gave. Was it weight, hp, danger, or some other method you used? Would you be able to include in the documentation some general guidelines as to how to decide what size of the sample's a given creature should drop? If it's all by feel no sense in writing any documentation but I wanted to check in case.

It's by feel and a combination of all of them along with other sources of sample availability and mutation category rarity, I don't think there's a way to consistently document it. I was aiming for a balance of attainability versus how "normal" the mutation category is, more than a strict rubric of size -> sample count or similar methods.

That is what I expected and there's nothing wrong with that. edit: I unresolved the beast rabbit one to make sure you see my response.

[Maleclypse]

Let me know if you make any changes you think need further review but otherwise this is great and I trust your judgement.

[MylieDaniels]

Thank you!