Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lowered excessive reading times of some cooking books. #37513

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2020

Conversation

Kelenius
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

SUMMARY: Balance "Lowered excessive reading times of some cooking books."

Purpose of change

These reading timers are too high - good comparison is that they take more time to read than chemistry books. They do not fit with the typical book reading times of this level.

Describe the solution

Timers for simple cooking books at or higher than 45 minutes per chapter are lowered.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Numbers could be tweaked differently, I suppose.

Testing

None, simple JSON change.

@Brian-Otten
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me, the time changes are a good call and since it's a pure value change there's no chance of messed up code.

@ZhilkinSerg ZhilkinSerg added [JSON] Changes (can be) made in JSON Game: Balance Balancing of (existing) in-game features. Items / Item Actions / Item Qualities Items and how they work and interact labels Jan 29, 2020
@ZhilkinSerg ZhilkinSerg merged commit fc830a7 into CleverRaven:master Jan 29, 2020
@Jerimee
Copy link
Contributor

Jerimee commented Jan 29, 2020

Thanks for doing this, the only one that was supposed to be oppressive was the "eat your way to a fit physique" because it is supposed to be a horrible written train-wreck of a self-help book.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Game: Balance Balancing of (existing) in-game features. Items / Item Actions / Item Qualities Items and how they work and interact [JSON] Changes (can be) made in JSON
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants