Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Explosive chemistry - in very small steps, issue I & II #37179
Explosive chemistry - in very small steps, issue I & II #37179
Changes from 4 commits
7803c18
ea24f2e
aa41c11
ce67731
b5925be
dc254c8
3914029
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lots of things here. First off, pyrolysis of coal is going to produce a huge variety of products. To obtain a range of materials you are interested in, you would need some very fine temperature control. 600-800 c is also far too hot, as https://www.intechopen.com/books/pyrolysis/pyrolysis-of-low-rank-coal-from-research-to-practice seems to indicate that your useful fraction here is obtained at ~350c in general. As illustrated there in this image, this 'useful fraction' would still be very impure and require additional work.
Also 600-800 c is in the softening temperature range for soda-lime glass.
I'm not saying this can't be done, I'm saying you'd have way more byproducts than you indicate, some not useful to the survivor (or a faction even). A more controlled, dedicated pyrolysis and distillation setup is needed to really get this to be feasible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Temperature would be dependent on type of coal used for reaction, so yes, for lignites it would be significantly lower than for anthracites. Pyrolysis is done in a crucible not in glassware, and products are significantly cooled before reaching refinement part of the setup.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing water, KNO2. Saltpeter is KNO3, not nitrite.
Also missing a HUGE amount of water, or ice water, or plenty of time, to take on all the heat your source wants to make to not explode your glassware when you dilute the nitric acid. The book also wants you to cool the mixture as it's forming the intermediate.
This also produces nitrogen oxide as a byproduct. These should either be: Scrubbed with a scrubber setup that's not in game, consumed by consuming filter mask charges, or dealt with safely by doing the work in a fumehood. Oh, or dealt with by the survivor inhaling them and getting serious lung injuries.
The cooling isn't really something we have in game yet as part of recipes...
The stoichometry appears to be a little off: 47 g phenol : 43 g KNO2: 21 g NaOH: 224 mL/(purity nitric acid used) of nitric acid. I'm not currently in a place to be able to balance the reaction and give the ratio of DNP produce, but I trust you'll be able to do so for your PR? I can assist later if not.
And, as erk says: this really needs to consume some analysis charges. Your source even mentioned the MP to check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thermal decomposition with iron as catalyst, abstracted - to be revised if kno2 becomes useful in more reactions
Perhaps bit more water, definitely not huge amounts. Dilution can be done in controlled manner with stirring to reduce heat generation.
Can be simply done outside or by the open window, most any reaction involving HNO3 does so.
Hence that requirement is omitted.
Better to have nice round numbers than perfect accuracy, as long as its close enough. Though I might be convinced for going stichiometrically accurate once all reagents are converted to ml/grams and have concentrations defined.
No, you need a scale and a thermometer (like for almost ANY reaction). And for .5C precision test one does not need to go to F-J aparatus - a test tube, some oil and thermometer will do.