PyTorch interface for TrueGrad Optimizers
python3 -m pip install truegrad
TrueGrad supports various backends, each with their own tradeoffs:
Name | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
truegrad.nn | * What you see is what you get - Modules not in truegrad.nn and truegrad.nn.functional are not supported * Custom forward/backward for some fused functions * Optimized backward passes |
* Limited applicability - custom modules can't be used * Requires code modification |
truegrad.utils.patch_torch | * Uses truegrad.nn under the hood * Works for many (off-the-shelf!) torch models * No code modification necessary |
* Uncertainty if model is compatible |
backpack | * Highest stability * Loud warnings and errors * Battle-tested * Simple to extend further |
* High memory usage * High compute usage * Sparse support for torch operations |
truegrad.utils.patch_model | * Works with custom models | * Fails silently on fused functions * ~50% to 100% slower than truegrad.nn |
patch_torch + patch_model | * Best compatibility * Reduced overheads compared to patch_model (by falling back to faster pre-patched patch_torch where available) |
* Fails silently on fused functions outside of torch.nn * Slower than truegrad.nn when truegrad.nn would've been enough |
Below, you'll find examples for each of these backends, as well as a general strategy allowing partial application of TrueGrad.
The preferred method of using TrueGrad is by replacing torch.nn
with performant truegrad.nn
modules. While other
methods add compute and memory overheads, truegrad.nn
and truegrad.nn.functional
have hand-crafted gradients. This
is the most powerful method, although it requires code modifications.
import torch
from truegrad import nn
from truegrad.optim import TGAdamW
# define model by mixing truegrad.nn and torch.nn
model = torch.nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(1, 10),
nn.LayerNorm(10),
torch.nn.ReLU(),
nn.Linear(10, 1))
optim = TGAdamW(model.parameters()) # truegrad.optim.TGAdamW instead of torch.optim.AdamW
# standard training loop
while True:
input = torch.randn((16, 1))
model(input).mean().backward()
optim.step()
optim.zero_grad()
In some cases, you can't modify the model's source. For example, when importing models from torchvision
. If that's the
case, or if you simply want to try out TrueGrad, you can use truegrad.utils.patch_torch()
, to
replace torch.nn.Module
's with truegrad.nn.Module
's where possible. For example, the code below can be used to train
a ResNet-18:
import torch
from torchvision.models import resnet18
from truegrad.optim import TGAdamW
from truegrad.utils import patch_torch
patch_torch() # call before model creation, otherwise complete freedom
model = resnet18().cuda()
optim = TGAdamW(model.parameters(), lr=1e-7, weight_decay=0)
# constant input/output to overfit
inp = torch.randn((2, 3, 224, 224)).cuda()
tgt = torch.randint(0, 1000, (2,)).cuda()
# standard training loop
i = 0
while True:
loss = torch.nn.functional.cross_entropy(model(inp), tgt)
loss.backward()
optim.step()
optim.zero_grad()
i += 1
if i % 5 == 0:
print(i, loss.item())
Similarly, most huggingface transformers work out of the box:
import torch
import transformers
from torch.nn import functional as F
from truegrad.optim import TGAdamW
from truegrad.utils import patch_torch
patch_torch() # only added line to get truegrad statistics for TGAdamW
model = transformers.BertModel.from_pretrained("google/bert_uncased_L-2_H-128_A-2") # any existing model
tokenizer = transformers.BertTokenizer.from_pretrained("google/bert_uncased_L-2_H-128_A-2")
optim = TGAdamW(model.parameters())
# constant input to overfit
input = tokenizer(["Hello World!"], return_tensors="pt")
# training loop as normal
while True:
out = model(**input)
loss = F.l1_loss(out[0], torch.ones_like(out[0]))
loss.backward()
optim.step()
optim.zero_grad()
print(loss.item())
Note that this works even though transformers have custom modules, which could cause issues. The key factor is that all
parameters come from torch.nn.Module
's, which are patched by patch_torch()
. Therefore, truegrad handles all
parameter usages. Therefore, any composition of torch.nn.Module
's makes for a truegrad-compatible model.
The most stable although also memory hungry method to compute TrueGrad statistics is to use
BackPack. BackPack is a third-party library that automatically computes the sum
of gradient squares and works for most models by implementing custom backward rules for many torch.nn.Module
's.
import backpack
import torch
from torch.nn import CrossEntropyLoss
from truegrad.optim import TGAdamW
from torchvision.models import alexnet
model = alexnet() # BatchNorm and in-place ops (like ResNet's residual path) aren't supported
optim = TGAdamW(model.parameters(), lr=1e-7, weight_decay=0)
# replace inplace ops like nn.ReLU(inplace=True) where possible
for mod in model.modules():
if hasattr(mod, "inplace"):
mod.inplace = False
# backpack relies on module-level pytorch hooks
model = backpack.extend(model)
lossfunc = backpack.extend(CrossEntropyLoss())
# constant input/output to overfit
inp = torch.randn((2, 3, 224, 224))
tgt = torch.randint(0, 1000, (2,))
# standard training loop
i = 0
while True:
# "SumGradSquared" computes the sum of the squared gradient
with backpack.backpack(backpack.extensions.SumGradSquared()):
loss = lossfunc(model(inp), tgt)
loss.backward()
optim.step()
optim.zero_grad()
i += 1
if i % 5 == 0:
print(i, loss.item())
If you're using custom modules with self-defined parameters, this method will not work. Additionally, note that, if
your model has any layer called .output
or you're using PyTorch >= 1.13, you will need to install
BackPack-HF via
python3 -m pip install git+https://github.com/ClashLuke/backpack-hf
.
Another option to integrate TrueGrad into existing models is to patch them using truegrad.utils.patch_model()
.
patch_model()
will go through all torch.nn.Module
's in PyTorch model and convert their torch.nn.Parameter
's to
truegrad.nn.TrueGradParameter
's. A TrueGradParameter
acts largely the same as a torch.nn.Parameter
, but adds
required operations into the model's backward pass. Note that this doesn't give the most effective computation graph,
but works well for many custom models.
Importantly, be aware that this does not work for fused functions, such as torch.nn.LayerNorm
and torch.nn.MultiheadAttention
. However, unfused functions which directly access a parameter, such as multiplication,
work well. Therefore, torch.nn.Linear and HuggingFace's attention work as expected.
import torch
from truegrad.optim import TGAdamW
from truegrad.utils import patch_model
from torchvision.models import alexnet
model = alexnet() # patch_model can't handle fused ops like VGG's and ResNet's BatchNorm
optim = TGAdamW(model.parameters())
# replace inplace ops like nn.ReLU(inplace=True) where possible
for mod in model.modules():
if hasattr(mod, "inplace"):
mod.inplace = False
patch_model(model) # replace torch.nn.Parameter with truegrad.nn.Parameter
# constant input/output to overfit
inp = torch.randn((2, 3, 224, 224))
tgt = torch.randint(0, 1000, (2,))
# standard training loop
i = 0
while True:
loss = torch.nn.functional.cross_entropy(model(inp), tgt)
loss.backward()
optim.step()
optim.zero_grad()
i += 1
if i % 5 == 0:
print(i, loss.item())
One way of avoiding truegrad.utils.patch_model's downsides when working with off-the-shelf
models containing custom parameters, such as lucidrains' ViT's is to also
patch_torch
. This takes care of many fused functions, such as LayerNorm, while still allowing full flexibility in
model design.
import torch
from vit_pytorch.levit import LeViT
from truegrad.utils import patch_torch, patch_model
from truegrad.optim import TGAdamW
patch_torch() # before model instantiation
levit = LeViT(
image_size=224,
num_classes=1000,
stages=3, # number of stages
dim=(256, 384, 512), # dimensions at each stage
depth=4, # transformer of depth 4 at each stage
heads=(4, 6, 8), # heads at each stage
mlp_mult=2,
dropout=0.1
)
opt = TGAdamW(levit.parameters())
patch_model(levit) # replace torch.nn.Parameter with truegrad.nn.TrueGradParameter
# constant input to overfit
img = torch.randn(1, 3, 224, 224)
# standard training loop
while True:
loss = levit(img).square().mean()
loss.backward()
opt.step()
opt.zero_grad()
print(loss.item())
Unfortunately, it's not always sensible to apply TrueGrad, as some backward passes are too slow, and sometimes it's
impossible to avoid a fused function.
Therefore, it can be an option to use TGAdamW only on specific subsections of the model. To do so, you can
specify default_to_adam=True
to TGAdamW. Adding this option allows TGAdamW to fall back to AdamW if there is
no sum_grad_squared
attribute available.
For example, the code from #nn could be extended in the following way:
import torch
from truegrad import nn
from truegrad.optim import TGAdamW
model = torch.nn.Sequential(nn.Linear(1, 10), # Weights coming from truegrad.nn
nn.LayerNorm(10),
torch.nn.ReLU(),
torch.nn.Linear(10, 1)) # Weights coming torch.nn
optim = TGAdamW(model.parameters(), default_to_adam=True)
# standard training loop
i = 0
while True:
input = torch.randn((16, 1))
loss = model(input).mean()
loss.backward()
optim.step()
optim.zero_grad()
i += 1
if i % 5 == 0:
print(i, loss.item())