Update default PGO kernel to 6.6.0 and update known good revision #248
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
…78f64f3bd0 This has been qualified on aarch64 and x86_64 hosts using my llvm-kernel-testing repository. Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
nathanchance
requested review from
msfjarvis,
nickdesaulniers and
stephenhines
as code owners
msfjarvis
approved these changes
Nov 4, 2023
onettboots
pushed a commit
to onettboots/boolx-clang-build
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: onettboots <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This has been qualified on aarch64 and x86_64 hosts using my llvm-kernel-testing repository.
LoongArch builds are currently broken at this revision but the fix should hopefully be picked up and backported to all relevant releases in a relatively timely manner, so I don't think it is worth changing the revision just for this.