Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change how xp is made #223

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Change how xp is made #223

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Lodish
Copy link
Contributor

@Lodish Lodish commented Jul 2, 2021

An alternative to nerfing the grinding mill, xp requires a lored bottle, that itself needs essence and clay in it's creation

Input 192 glass, 16 clay balls, 1 essence
output 192 lored bottles required for xp recipes

@Convoy20
Copy link
Contributor

Convoy20 commented Jul 2, 2021

While I love wacky changes

doing this after producers have literally spent 3 years making XP and have pushed the price down to 1d per eblocks makes me think it's a little too late to change things

@Lodish
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lodish commented Jul 2, 2021

While I love wacky changes

doing this after producers have literally spent 3 years making XP and have pushed the price down to 1d per eblocks makes me think it's a little too late to change things

Its more about fixing the grinding mill mistake, not really to increase xp cost

@xFier
Copy link

xFier commented Jul 2, 2021

This is a thinly-veiled attempt at pushing the same agenda as your grinder-nerf.

  1. You're attacking people's sand stockpiles in a manner that seems like you're trying to get back at them for stopping your previous attempt at this.

  2. You could've added the clay and essence requirements directly to the XP recipes, but no, you want to make all of the glass bottles people have already made useless.

  3. The essence requirement hurts everyone. An essence requirement only serves to put a cap on the amount of XP that can be produced in a single day, while hurting smaller groups who can now only produce a fraction of what bigger nations can.

EDIT: (after your admission that its more about fixing the grinding mill mistake) I think we're well past that, the "mistake" has happened and you only serve to make the game less enjoyable for the players.

@Lodish
Copy link
Contributor Author

Lodish commented Jul 2, 2021

You're attacking people's sand stockpiles in a manner that seems like you're trying to get back at them for stopping your previous attempt at this.

This still requires sand so I'm not sure what you mean

You could've added the clay and essence requirements directly to the XP recipes, but no, you want to make all of the glass bottles people have already made useless.

people can use glass bottles for other things, or just use them up before a change.

The essence requirement hurts everyone. An essence requirement only serves to put a cap on the amount of XP that can be produced in a single day, while hurting smaller groups who can now only produce a fraction of what bigger nations can.

It's one of the few unbottable things, what would you suggest instead?

@xFier
Copy link

xFier commented Jul 2, 2021

It's one of the few unbottable things, what would you suggest instead?

The genie is out of the bottle at this point, you can't really replace something that used to be un-bottable (and scaled with how much effort someone was willing to put in) with something that everyone gets the same amount of regardless of effort.

@yodabird19
Copy link

radical proposal: do nothing
every suggestion is getting more hate than not

@Virizion
Copy link

Virizion commented Jul 3, 2021

radical proposal: do nothing
every suggestion is getting more hate than not

unironically this. I don't see much of an issue with how the server is right now.

@nebula161
Copy link

radical proposal: do nothing
every suggestion is getting more hate than not

nah, keep the clay requirement but add it on top of everything else instead of changing bottles

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants