Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated Fusion-vnext test projects to use xUnit v3 instead of TUnit #7847

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

glen-84
Copy link
Collaborator

@glen-84 glen-84 commented Dec 18, 2024

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

  • Updated Fusion-vnext test projects to use xUnit v3 instead of TUnit.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.38%. Comparing base (91b8977) to head (170f69c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7847      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   74.38%   74.38%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2876     2876              
  Lines      150071   150071              
  Branches    17450    17450              
==========================================
- Hits       111631   111629       -2     
- Misses      32622    32627       +5     
+ Partials     5818     5815       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.38% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@michaelstaib michaelstaib merged commit 61f1f59 into main Dec 18, 2024
103 checks passed
@michaelstaib michaelstaib deleted the gai/fusion-vnext-xunit-v3 branch December 18, 2024 16:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants