Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fusion] Improve Inlining Rewriter #7838

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

michaelstaib
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@michaelstaib michaelstaib changed the title Adds more complex field requirements. [Fusion] Adds more complex field requirements. Dec 17, 2024
@michaelstaib michaelstaib added this to the HC-15.0.0 milestone Dec 17, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.38%. Comparing base (7cb0019) to head (59352d8).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7838   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.38%   74.38%           
=======================================
  Files        2876     2876           
  Lines      150071   150071           
  Branches    17450    17450           
=======================================
+ Hits       111625   111637   +12     
+ Misses      32630    32617   -13     
- Partials     5816     5817    +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.38% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

public FragmentDefinitionNode GetFragmentDefinition(string name)
=> fragments[name];

public void AddField(FieldNode field)
{
if (!Fields.TryGetValue(field.Name.Value, out var fields))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be alias or name.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you are right

@michaelstaib michaelstaib changed the title [Fusion] Adds more complex field requirements. [Fusion] Improve Inlining Rewriter Dec 18, 2024
@michaelstaib michaelstaib merged commit c31b5e5 into main Dec 18, 2024
2 checks passed
@michaelstaib michaelstaib deleted the mst/field-requirements branch December 18, 2024 13:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants