-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 749
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Fusion] Improve Inlining Rewriter #7838
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7838 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 74.38% 74.38%
=======================================
Files 2876 2876
Lines 150071 150071
Branches 17450 17450
=======================================
+ Hits 111625 111637 +12
+ Misses 32630 32617 -13
- Partials 5816 5817 +1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
...te/Fusion-vnext/test/Fusion.Execution.Tests/Planning/InlineFragmentOperationRewriterTests.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
public FragmentDefinitionNode GetFragmentDefinition(string name) | ||
=> fragments[name]; | ||
|
||
public void AddField(FieldNode field) | ||
{ | ||
if (!Fields.TryGetValue(field.Name.Value, out var fields)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should be alias or name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you are right
No description provided.