Fix backwards compatibility for add_private_key

[Quexington]

Accidentally broke this endpoint in #17792 by specifying exactly what was part of data rather than just updating the relevant part of the user's request.

[coveralls-official]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 9651527731

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 3 of 3 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• 19 unchanged lines in 7 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.007%) to 90.882%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
chia/daemon/keychain_proxy.py	1	72.57%
chia/farmer/farmer.py	1	72.23%
chia/wallet/wallet_node.py	1	88.79%
chia/daemon/client.py	1	73.33%
chia/server/ws_connection.py	3	87.96%
chia/full_node/full_node.py	5	85.7%
chia/server/node_discovery.py	7	79.96%

Totals
Change from base Build 9650300892:	-0.007%
Covered Lines:	100223
Relevant Lines:	110216

---

💛 - Coveralls