-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat: using tauri fetch api in App #5565
Feat: using tauri fetch api in App #5565
Conversation
@lloydzhou is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 13
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (16)
app/global.d.ts (1)
15-15
: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for clarity.The addition of the
convertFileSrc
method to the__TAURI__
object is appropriate and aligns with Tauri's API structure. This method will likely be useful for converting file paths to URLs that can be used within the application.Consider adding a brief JSDoc comment to explain the purpose and usage of this method. For example:
/** * Converts a file path to a URL that can be used by the application. * @param url The file path to convert. * @param protocol Optional protocol to use for the converted URL. * @returns The converted URL as a string. */ convertFileSrc(url: string, protocol?: string): string;This documentation will help developers understand the method's purpose and how to use it correctly.
app/store/access.ts (1)
33-33
: LGTM: Consistent use of base URL constantsThe updates to the
DEFAULT_ACCESS_STATE
object correctly implement the newly imported base URL constants. This change improves consistency and maintainability across the application.For complete consistency, consider updating the
azureUrl
property in the same manner:- azureUrl: "", + azureUrl: AZURE_BASE_URL,This would require adding
AZURE_BASE_URL
to the import statement as well.Also applies to: 42-42, 48-48, 53-53, 58-58, 62-62, 66-66, 70-70, 74-74, 79-79
app/client/platforms/moonshot.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-203
: Summary: Changes look good, but consider broader impact.The modifications to this file are minimal and focused on updating the base URL constant. These changes appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to standardize API URL handling across the application.
Next steps:
- Ensure that the
MOONSHOT_BASE_URL
constant is correctly defined in the@/app/constant
file.- Verify that this change is consistent with other API-related modifications in the pull request.
- Update any relevant documentation or configuration files that may reference the old
DEFAULT_API_HOST
constant.- Consider adding or updating unit tests to cover the URL construction logic in the
path
method.Given that this change affects how API URLs are constructed, it would be beneficial to review the overall architecture of API handling in the application. Consider whether a more centralized approach to managing API URLs could simplify future updates and reduce the risk of inconsistencies across different parts of the codebase.
app/client/platforms/bytedance.ts (2)
169-170
: LGTM. Consider minor refactoring for clarity.The use of the custom
fetch
function infetchEventSource
is consistent with the new import and aligns with the apparent goal of using a unified fetch implementation.For improved readability, consider extracting the
fetchEventSource
options into a separate object:const fetchEventSourceOptions = { fetch, ...chatPayload, async onopen(res) { // ... existing onopen logic ... }, // ... other event handlers ... }; fetchEventSource(chatPath, fetchEventSourceOptions);This refactoring would make the function call cleaner and the options more maintainable.
Line range hint
1-270
: Overall assessment: Changes look good, consider broader implications.The modifications to introduce and use a custom
fetch
function are well-implemented and focused. They appear to be part of a larger effort to standardize fetch operations across the application.To ensure consistency and maximize the benefits of this change:
- Review other files in the project to identify opportunities for using the custom
fetch
function.- Consider adding documentation or comments explaining the benefits and any special features of the custom
fetch
implementation.- If not already done, create unit tests for the custom
fetch
function to ensure its reliability.app/client/platforms/iflytek.ts (1)
44-44
: LGTM! Consider additional error handling.The changes to the base URL construction and the use of the custom
fetch
function look good. These modifications align with the updated import statements and potentially improve the API request handling.Consider adding additional error handling for the base URL construction. For example:
- baseUrl = isApp ? IFLYTEK_BASE_URL + apiPath : apiPath; + baseUrl = isApp ? IFLYTEK_BASE_URL + apiPath : apiPath; + if (!baseUrl) { + throw new Error("Failed to construct base URL for Iflytek API"); + }This will help catch potential issues early if the base URL is not properly set.
Also applies to: 153-153
app/client/platforms/alibaba.ts (1)
182-182
: LGTM! Consider updating documentationThe addition of the custom
fetch
function tofetchEventSource
is a good change that allows for consistent fetch behavior across the application.Consider adding a comment explaining why a custom
fetch
is being used here, to help future maintainers understand the rationale behind this change.app/client/platforms/tencent.ts (1)
74-74
: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The change to use
TENCENT_BASE_URL
when the application is identified as an app is appropriate and aligns with the updated import. This simplifies the base URL determination logic while maintaining backwards compatibility.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the distinction between app and non-app modes for future maintainers:
- baseUrl = isApp ? TENCENT_BASE_URL : ApiPath.Tencent; + // Use TENCENT_BASE_URL for app mode, fallback to ApiPath.Tencent for web + baseUrl = isApp ? TENCENT_BASE_URL : ApiPath.Tencent;app/client/platforms/baidu.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-324
: Summary: Customfetch
implementation introduced.The changes in this file are part of a larger effort to use a custom
fetch
implementation across the application. The modifications are minimal and focused:
- Import of custom
fetch
from a local module.- Usage of the custom
fetch
in thefetchEventSource
method.These changes should improve consistency in API request handling. However, it's important to ensure that:
- The custom
fetch
implementation in@/app/utils/stream
is thoroughly tested and maintains feature parity with the nativefetch
.- All uses of
fetch
in this file and related files are updated to use the custom implementation.- The behavior of
fetchEventSource
with the customfetch
is verified, especially for error handling and abort scenarios.Consider documenting the reasons for using a custom
fetch
implementation and any additional features it provides. This will help maintain the code and onboard new developers.app/utils/chat.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-368
: Consider the architectural implications of Tauri-specific networking.The changes in this file introduce Tauri-specific networking, which is a significant architectural decision. While the implementation is clean and minimal, it's important to consider the following:
- Cross-platform compatibility: Ensure that the application can still function in non-Tauri environments if required.
- Error handling: Add appropriate error handling for cases where Tauri-specific features might not be available.
- Documentation: Update the project documentation to reflect this change in networking strategy.
- Testing: Implement tests that cover both Tauri and non-Tauri environments to ensure robust functionality across platforms.
Consider implementing a strategy pattern or dependency injection for the fetch implementation. This would allow for easy switching between Tauri and non-Tauri networking based on the runtime environment, enhancing the application's flexibility and maintainability.
app/client/platforms/openai.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-601
: Summary: API endpoint configuration centralized, testing recommendedThe changes in this file align with the PR objective of using the Tauri fetch API by centralizing the API endpoint configuration. While the modifications are minimal, they have the potential to impact API calls throughout the application.
To ensure the changes don't introduce any regressions:
- Thoroughly test all API-dependent functionalities in both app and non-app contexts.
- Verify that the
OPENAI_BASE_URL
is correctly set and propagated in different environments.- Consider adding or updating unit tests for the
path
method to cover both app and non-app scenarios.app/utils/stream.ts (4)
39-39
: Simplify conditional function call with optional chainingThe expression
unlisten && unlisten();
can be simplified using optional chaining for better readability.Apply this diff:
- unlisten && unlisten(); + unlisten?.();π§° Tools
πͺ Biome
[error] 39-39: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
79-83
: Offer assistance with FormData handling in the 'body' parameterNoticed the TODO comment regarding FormData handling. Implementing FormData support will enhance the functionality by allowing form data to be sent in the request body.
Would you like assistance in implementing FormData support for the
body
parameter? I can help provide a solution or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
24-29
: Ensure default 'body' parameter aligns with expected typesThe
body
parameter is defaulted to an empty arraybody = []
, which may not align with the expectedBodyInit
type from theRequestInit
interface. Consider setting the default toundefined
or handling different body types appropriately.Apply this diff:
- body = [], + body,Ensure that the
body
is processed correctly later in the code, handling cases when it'sundefined
, a string, or other permissible types.
Line range hint
22-97
: Consider renaming the function to avoid confusion with the global 'fetch'Overriding the global
fetch
function may lead to confusion or unintended side effects. It might be better to rename the function to something more specific, liketauriFetch
, to make it clear that it's a custom implementation.Apply this diff to rename the function:
-export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<any> { +export function tauriFetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<any> {Ensure all references to this function are updated accordingly.
π§° Tools
πͺ Biome
[error] 39-39: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 64-64: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 30-30: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 64-64: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
src-tauri/src/stream.rs (1)
60-63
: Use a logging framework instead ofprintln!()
for better log management.The code uses
println!()
statements to output debug information (lines 60-63). For better log management and to control log levels, consider using a logging framework likelog
orenv_logger
.Example using the
log
crate:use log::debug; debug!("method: {:?}", method); debug!("url: {:?}", url); debug!("headers: {:?}", headers); debug!("headers: {:?}", _headers);
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
β Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src-tauri/Cargo.lock
is excluded by!**/*.lock
π Files selected for processing (20)
- app/client/platforms/alibaba.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/anthropic.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/baidu.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/bytedance.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/google.ts (4 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/iflytek.ts (4 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/moonshot.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/openai.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/tencent.ts (4 hunks)
- app/constant.ts (0 hunks)
- app/global.d.ts (1 hunks)
- app/store/access.ts (3 hunks)
- app/store/plugin.ts (1 hunks)
- app/store/sync.ts (1 hunks)
- app/utils/chat.ts (2 hunks)
- app/utils/cors.ts (0 hunks)
- app/utils/stream.ts (1 hunks)
- src-tauri/Cargo.toml (1 hunks)
- src-tauri/src/main.rs (1 hunks)
- src-tauri/src/stream.rs (1 hunks)
π€ Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- app/constant.ts
- app/utils/cors.ts
π§° Additional context used
πͺ Biome
app/utils/stream.ts
[error] 39-39: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 64-64: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 30-30: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 64-64: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
π Additional comments (34)
src-tauri/src/main.rs (3)
4-4
: New module added:stream
The addition of the
stream
module is a good practice for organizing code related to streaming functionality. This aligns with the PR objective of using the Tauri fetch API.
8-8
: New invoke handler added forstream::stream_fetch
The integration of
stream::stream_fetch
as an invoke handler is appropriate for exposing this functionality to the frontend. This change directly supports the PR's goal of implementing the Tauri fetch API.To ensure the
stream
module is properly implemented, let's verify its contents:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the contents of the stream module # Test: Check if stream.rs exists and view its contents cat src-tauri/src/stream.rs
Line range hint
1-12
: Request for information: Bug fixes mentioned in PR objectivesThe changes in this file implement new features as mentioned in the PR objectives. However, the PR objectives also mention bug fixes. Could you please provide information about any bug fixes implemented in this PR? If they are in other files, it would be helpful to include those files in the review.
To check for other changed files, we can use the following script:
src-tauri/Cargo.toml (6)
38-44
: Summary: Changes align with PR objective and enhance project capabilities.The additions to the Cargo.toml file are consistent with the PR objective of using the Tauri fetch API. The new dependencies (percent-encoding, reqwest, futures-util, and bytes) and the "linux-protocol-headers" feature for tauri provide the necessary tools for implementing HTTP requests, handling streaming data, and working with URLs.
These changes enhance the project's capabilities for network communication and data processing. However, it's important to ensure that these new dependencies are used effectively and that the "linux-protocol-headers" feature doesn't introduce any cross-platform compatibility issues.
44-44
: LGTM: Addition of bytes dependency.The addition of the bytes crate is appropriate for low-level byte manipulation. This could be useful for efficient handling of network data or file I/O, which aligns with the PR objective of using the Tauri fetch API for streaming data.
To verify the usage of this new dependency, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the bytes crate # Search for imports of bytes rg --type rust 'use bytes::' # Search for potential usage of bytes types or functions rg --type rust 'Bytes|BytesMut|Buf|BufMut'
41-41
: LGTM: Addition of percent-encoding dependency.The addition of the percent-encoding crate is appropriate for URL encoding and decoding tasks. This is a well-maintained and widely used crate for this purpose.
To verify the usage of this new dependency, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the percent-encoding crate # Search for imports of percent-encoding rg --type rust 'use percent_encoding::' # Search for potential usage of percent-encoding functions rg --type rust 'encode|decode'
42-42
: LGTM: Addition of reqwest dependency.The addition of the reqwest crate is appropriate for making HTTP requests. This aligns with the PR objective of using the Tauri fetch API. reqwest is a well-maintained and widely used HTTP client library for Rust.
To verify the usage of this new dependency, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the reqwest crate # Search for imports of reqwest rg --type rust 'use reqwest::' # Search for potential usage of reqwest client or functions rg --type rust 'Client|get|post|send'
43-43
: LGTM: Addition of futures-util dependency.The addition of the futures-util crate is appropriate for advanced asynchronous programming. This could be related to handling asynchronous HTTP requests or streaming data, which aligns with the PR objective of using the Tauri fetch API.
To verify the usage of this new dependency, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the futures-util crate # Search for imports of futures-util rg --type rust 'use futures_util::' # Search for potential usage of futures-util functions or types rg --type rust 'StreamExt|FutureExt|TryFutureExt|TryStreamExt'
38-38
: Verify the necessity of the "linux-protocol-headers" feature.The addition of the "linux-protocol-headers" feature to the tauri dependency may have implications for cross-platform compatibility. Please ensure that this feature is necessary for the project's requirements and doesn't negatively impact the application's behavior on non-Linux platforms.
To verify the usage and necessity of this feature, you can run the following script:
app/store/sync.ts (1)
28-28
: SimplifiedproxyUrl
assignment inDEFAULT_SYNC_STATE
The change removes the
corsPath
function call and directly assignsApiPath.Cors
to theproxyUrl
property. This simplification is generally a good practice as it reduces unnecessary function calls.However, we should verify if this change is consistent with the intended behavior:
- Does
ApiPath.Cors
already contain the correct path without needingcorsPath
processing?- Is
corsPath
used elsewhere in the codebase for similar purposes?To ensure consistency and identify potential issues, let's run the following checks:
If
corsPath
is not used elsewhere andApiPath.Cors
is used directly in other places, this change is likely correct. Otherwise, we may need to update other occurrences for consistency.β Verification successful
Verified Removal of
corsPath
The
corsPath
function is no longer used in the codebase, andApiPath.Cors
is appropriately assigned directly to theproxyUrl
property. This change is consistent and does not introduce any issues.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check usage of corsPath and ApiPath.Cors echo "Checking corsPath usage:" rg "corsPath\(" --type typescript echo "\nChecking ApiPath.Cors usage:" rg "ApiPath\.Cors" --type typescript echo "\nChecking if corsPath is defined:" rg "function corsPath" --type typescriptLength of output: 431
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check usage of corsPath and ApiPath.Cors in TypeScript files echo "Checking corsPath usage:" rg "corsPath\(" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" echo "\nChecking ApiPath.Cors usage:" rg "ApiPath\.Cors" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" echo "\nChecking if corsPath is defined:" rg "function corsPath" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 379
app/store/access.ts (2)
5-14
: LGTM: Improved import structure for base URLsThe addition of base URL constants to the import statement is a positive change. It centralizes the configuration and makes it easier to maintain and update base URLs across the application.
Line range hint
1-238
: Summary: Improved API configuration structureThe changes in this file significantly improve the configuration structure for various API endpoints. By centralizing the base URLs and using constants, the code becomes more maintainable and less prone to errors. These modifications align well with the PR's objective of enhancing the handling of API requests.
Key improvements:
- Centralized import of base URL constants
- Consistent use of these constants in the
DEFAULT_ACCESS_STATE
objectThese changes lay a solid foundation for implementing the Tauri fetch API across the application.
app/client/platforms/moonshot.ts (2)
43-43
: LGTM. Consider testing in different environments.The modification correctly implements the new
MOONSHOT_BASE_URL
constant while maintaining the existing logic for determining the base URL. This change preserves backwards compatibility for non-app contexts.To ensure the change doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior:
- Test the application in both app and non-app contexts to verify that the correct base URL is used in each case.
- Verify that API requests are correctly routed in all supported environments.
5-5
: LGTM. Verify constant usage across the codebase.The import of
MOONSHOT_BASE_URL
looks good. This change appears to be part of a larger refactoring to use a new constant for the base URL.To ensure consistency, let's verify the usage of this new constant across the codebase:
β Verification successful
To address the issue with unrecognized file types, let's search for
.ts
and.tsx
files directly:
Changes Verified: All instances of
DEFAULT_API_HOST
have been successfully replaced withMOONSHOT_BASE_URL
. No issues found.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of MOONSHOT_BASE_URL and look for any remaining instances of DEFAULT_API_HOST echo "Checking usage of MOONSHOT_BASE_URL:" rg --type typescript "MOONSHOT_BASE_URL" echo "\nChecking for any remaining instances of DEFAULT_API_HOST:" rg --type typescript "DEFAULT_API_HOST"Length of output: 362
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of MOONSHOT_BASE_URL and look for any remaining instances of DEFAULT_API_HOST in .ts and .tsx files echo "Checking usage of MOONSHOT_BASE_URL in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "MOONSHOT_BASE_URL" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" echo "\nChecking for any remaining instances of DEFAULT_API_HOST in .ts and .tsx files:" rg "DEFAULT_API_HOST" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 901
app/client/platforms/bytedance.ts (1)
26-26
: LGTM. Verify customfetch
implementation.The import of a custom
fetch
function from a local module is a good practice for centralizing and potentially enhancing fetch functionality.To ensure the custom
fetch
function is implemented correctly and consistently used, please run the following script:app/client/platforms/iflytek.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-253
: Overall LGTM! Suggest comprehensive API testing.The changes in this file appear to be part of a larger effort to refactor and improve API handling, particularly for the Iflytek platform. The modifications to the base URL construction and the use of a custom
fetch
function align with the PR objectives of using the Tauri fetch API.To ensure these changes haven't inadvertently affected the overall functionality, please conduct comprehensive testing of the API interactions, including:
- Verify that the correct base URL is used in different environments (app vs. non-app).
- Test the streaming functionality to ensure it works as expected with the new
fetch
implementation.- Check error handling scenarios to confirm they're still properly managed.
Consider adding or updating integration tests to cover these scenarios if they don't already exist.
4-4
: LGTM! Verify custom fetch implementation.The changes to the import statements look good. The addition of
IFLYTEK_BASE_URL
import aligns with the changes in the API base URL usage.Please verify the custom
fetch
implementation in@/app/utils/stream
:Also applies to: 25-25
app/client/platforms/alibaba.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-314
: Consider reviewing fetch usage across the projectWhile the changes in this file are minimal and focused, the introduction of a custom
fetch
implementation could have broader implications for the project.Consider conducting a broader review of fetch usage across the entire codebase to ensure consistency and to identify any other areas that might benefit from using this custom implementation.
To assist with this review, you can run the following script to identify other fetch usages in the project:
26-26
: Verify compatibility of customfetch
implementationThe introduction of a custom
fetch
function from@/app/utils/stream
is noteworthy. Please ensure that this implementation is fully compatible with thefetchEventSource
function and explain the rationale for using a customfetch
over the native one.To verify the compatibility and understand the custom implementation, please run the following script:
app/client/platforms/tencent.ts (3)
Line range hint
1-281
: Overall assessment: Changes look good with minor suggestions.The changes in this file are well-focused and align with the objectives of updating the API base URL configuration and integrating a custom fetch function. The modifications are consistent and maintain backwards compatibility. Consider implementing the suggested minor improvements for clarity and test coverage. Once these are addressed, the changes are ready for merging.
2-2
: LGTM! Verify usage of new imports.The changes in the import statements look good. The shift to
TENCENT_BASE_URL
and the introduction of a customfetch
function are appropriate for the intended changes.To ensure these new imports are used correctly throughout the file, please run the following script:
Also applies to: 25-25
β Verification successful
Update Shell Scripts to Remove
--type typescript
The previous shell scripts failed because
typescript
is not a recognized file type. Please update them to search without specifying the file type.
Verified: New Imports Are Utilized Correctly
The usage of
TENCENT_BASE_URL
and the customfetch
function has been confirmed withinapp/client/platforms/tencent.ts
. Both imports are actively used, ensuring that the changes are properly integrated.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify usage of TENCENT_BASE_URL and custom fetch function rg --type typescript 'TENCENT_BASE_URL' app/client/platforms/tencent.ts rg --type typescript 'fetch\(' app/client/platforms/tencent.tsLength of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify usage of TENCENT_BASE_URL and custom fetch function rg 'TENCENT_BASE_URL' app/client/platforms/tencent.ts rg 'fetch\(' app/client/platforms/tencent.tsLength of output: 296
181-181
: LGTM! Verify custom fetch function behavior.The integration of the custom
fetch
function intofetchEventSource
is appropriate and aligns with the earlier import change. This targeted enhancement should improve the streaming capabilities of the chat method.To ensure the custom
fetch
function behaves as expected, particularly in streaming scenarios, consider adding unit tests or integration tests. Here's a script to check for existing tests:If no tests are found, consider adding tests to verify the behavior of the custom
fetch
function in various scenarios, including streaming and error handling.app/store/plugin.ts (1)
10-10
: Verify the intention behind theisApp
assignment change.The modification to the
isApp
assignment changes its behavior:
- Previously,
isApp
directly reflected the value ofgetClientConfig()?.isApp
.- Now,
isApp
will betrue
for any value that's not strictlyfalse
, includingundefined
andnull
.This change affects how
baseURL
is determined later in the file (around line 54) and could potentially impact other parts of the application that rely on theisApp
value.Please confirm if this change is intentional and aligns with the expected behavior. If it is, consider adding a comment explaining the logic:
// Treat any non-false value as an indication that it's an app const isApp = getClientConfig()?.isApp !== false;To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This will help identify other places in the codebase that might be affected by this change.
β Verification successful
The
isApp
assignment change is verified and functions as intended.The update ensures
isApp
defaults totrue
unless explicitly set tofalse
, and no other parts of the codebase are adversely affected by this change.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of getClientConfig()?.isApp and isApp usage # Search for getClientConfig()?.isApp usage echo "Occurrences of getClientConfig()?.isApp:" rg --type typescript "getClientConfig\(\)\?\.isApp" # Search for isApp usage echo "\nOccurrences of isApp:" rg --type typescript "\bisApp\b" app/store/plugin.tsLength of output: 326
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of getClientConfig()?.isApp and isApp usage # Search for getClientConfig()?.isApp usage in TypeScript files echo "Occurrences of getClientConfig()?.isApp:" rg "getClientConfig\(\)\?\.isApp" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" # Search for isApp usage in app/store/plugin.ts echo -e "\nOccurrences of isApp in app/store/plugin.ts:" rg "\bisApp\b" app/store/plugin.tsLength of output: 2905
app/client/platforms/baidu.ts (1)
27-27
: LGTM. Verify usage of customfetch
implementation.The import of a custom
fetch
function from a local module is a good practice for centralizing API request handling. This change allows for consistent fetch behavior across the application.To ensure the custom
fetch
is used consistently, run the following script:β Verification successful
Generating new scripts to verify the usage of the custom
fetch
implementation.
Custom
fetch
implementation is consistently used inapp/client/platforms/baidu.ts
.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of custom fetch implementation # Test: Check for any remaining usage of global fetch rg --type typescript 'fetch\(' app/client/platforms/baidu.ts # Test: Confirm usage of imported fetch rg --type typescript 'fetch: fetch,' app/client/platforms/baidu.tsLength of output: 230
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of custom fetch implementation in baidu.ts # Check for any usage of global fetch rg '^\s*fetch\(' app/client/platforms/baidu.ts # Confirm usage of the imported custom fetch rg 'fetch\(' app/client/platforms/baidu.ts | grep -v 'import { fetch }'Length of output: 178
app/client/platforms/google.ts (4)
12-12
: LGTM: Importing GEMINI_BASE_URL constantThe import of
GEMINI_BASE_URL
from the constants file is a good practice. It centralizes the management of base URLs and makes it easier to update them across the application if needed.
Line range hint
1-338
: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and improve code qualityThe modifications in this file successfully introduce the use of the Tauri fetch API and improve the overall code structure:
- The introduction of
GEMINI_BASE_URL
enhances URL management.- The custom
fetch
import allows for centralized fetch behavior control.- Updates to the
path
method andfetchEventSource
call integrate these changes effectively.These changes align well with the PR objectives and should contribute to a more robust and flexible API interaction system.
25-25
: LGTM: Importing custom fetch implementationImporting a custom
fetch
implementation from the utility module is a good approach. It allows for centralized modifications to the fetch behavior across the application.To ensure the custom
fetch
implementation is robust, please verify its implementation:β Verification successful
: Custom
fetch
implementation confirmedThe custom
fetch
function is correctly implemented and exported fromapp/utils/stream.ts
. The import ingoogle.ts
is valid and aligns with the intended modifications.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the custom fetch implementation # Test: Check the implementation of the custom fetch function rg --type typescript -A 10 'export.*function fetch' app/utils/stream.tsLength of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the custom fetch implementation without specifying the file type # Test: Check the implementation of the custom fetch function rg 'export.*function fetch' app/utils/stream.ts -A 10Length of output: 375
38-38
: LGTM: Updated baseUrl logic and fetchEventSource optionsThe changes in the
path
method andfetchEventSource
call look good:
- Using
GEMINI_BASE_URL
for app environments aligns with the new constant import.- Including the custom
fetch
infetchEventSource
ensures consistent fetch behavior.These changes should improve the flexibility and consistency of API requests.
To ensure these changes don't introduce unexpected behavior, please verify:
The value of
GEMINI_BASE_URL
:The usage of
isApp
in other parts of the codebase:Also applies to: 217-217
β Verification successful
Verification Successful: baseUrl and isApp Usage Confirmed
The
baseUrl
is correctly set toGEMINI_BASE_URL
in the app environment, and the usage ofisApp
across the codebase is consistent and appropriate.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the value of GEMINI_BASE_URL # Test: Find the declaration of GEMINI_BASE_URL rg --type typescript 'export const GEMINI_BASE_URL' app/constant.tsLength of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check other usages of isApp # Test: Find other occurrences of isApp in the codebase rg --type typescript 'isApp'Length of output: 63
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the value of GEMINI_BASE_URL # Test: Find the declaration of GEMINI_BASE_URL using the correct type rg --type ts 'export const GEMINI_BASE_URL' app/constant.tsLength of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check other usages of isApp # Test: Find other occurrences of isApp in the codebase using the correct type rg --type ts 'isApp'Length of output: 5549
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the value of GEMINI_BASE_URL # Test: Find the declaration of GEMINI_BASE_URL using the correct type rg --type ts 'export const GEMINI_BASE_URL' app/constant.tsLength of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check other usages of isApp # Test: Find other occurrences of isApp in the codebase using the correct type rg --type ts 'isApp'Length of output: 5549
app/utils/chat.ts (1)
13-13
: LGTM: New import for Tauri-specific fetch implementation.The import of
tauriFetch
from the./stream
module is well-placed and clearly named, indicating its purpose for Tauri-specific networking.app/client/platforms/anthropic.ts (3)
11-11
: LGTM: Import of ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL is consistent with PR objectives.The addition of this import aligns with the PR's goal of updating base URL constants for various APIs. This change enhances the modularity of the code by separating the base URL definition.
Line range hint
1-413
: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and improve code modularity.The modifications in this file are focused on updating the base URL logic for the Anthropic API. These changes:
- Introduce a new constant
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL
.- Simplify the base URL selection logic in the
path
method.These updates align well with the PR objectives of enhancing API request handling and updating base URL constants. The changes also improve code modularity by centralizing the base URL definition.
No significant issues or concerns were identified in these changes. However, it's important to ensure that the
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL
constant is correctly defined and that this change is consistent with any other API-related updates in the project.
391-391
: LGTM: Updated base URL logic aligns with PR objectives.The change simplifies the base URL selection logic and uses the newly imported
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL
constant. This is consistent with the PR's goal of updating API base URLs.To ensure the correctness of this change, please verify the value of
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL
in the constants file. Run the following script to check its definition:β Verification successful
Action Required: Adjust the script to correctly search for
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL
.Please run the following script to verify the definition of
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL
:
LGTM: Updated base URL logic aligns with PR objectives.
The
ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL
is correctly set to"https://api.anthropic.com"
, ensuring the base URL selection logic functions as intended.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL # Test: Search for the ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL definition rg --type typescript 'export const ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL' app/constant.tsLength of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL # Test: Search for the ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL definition in TypeScript files rg 'export const ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL' --glob '*.ts'Length of output: 131
app/client/platforms/openai.ts (2)
5-5
: LGTM: Import of OPENAI_BASE_URL addedThe addition of
OPENAI_BASE_URL
to the imports is a good change. It likely centralizes the API endpoint configuration, which aligns with the PR's objective of using the Tauri fetch API.
101-101
: Verify impact on API calls after base URL changeThe replacement of
DEFAULT_API_HOST
withOPENAI_BASE_URL
is consistent with the import change. This modification alters how the base URL is constructed for API requests in the app context.To ensure this change doesn't inadvertently affect API calls, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any remaining uses of
DEFAULT_API_HOST
, verify the correct usage ofOPENAI_BASE_URL
, and check for any changes in API call patterns that might be affected by this modification.β Verification successful
Verified the impact on API calls after base URL change
The replacement of
DEFAULT_API_HOST
withOPENAI_BASE_URL
has been successfully verified. No remaining instances ofDEFAULT_API_HOST
were found, andOPENAI_BASE_URL
is correctly implemented across the necessary files. API call patterns remain consistent, ensuring that this change does not adversely affect API requests.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of DEFAULT_API_HOST and verify OPENAI_BASE_URL usage # Check for any remaining uses of DEFAULT_API_HOST echo "Checking for any remaining uses of DEFAULT_API_HOST:" rg "DEFAULT_API_HOST" --type ts # Verify OPENAI_BASE_URL usage echo "Verifying OPENAI_BASE_URL usage:" rg "OPENAI_BASE_URL" --type ts -C 2 # Check for any changes in API call patterns echo "Checking for changes in API call patterns:" rg "baseUrl\s*=|apiPath" --type ts -C 2Length of output: 19999
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/utils/stream.ts (3)
22-22
: Specify the function's return type more preciselyThe function currently returns
Promise<any>
, which may reduce the benefits of type checking. Since it returns aResponse
object, consider specifying the return type asPromise<Response>
for better type safety.Apply this diff to update the return type:
-export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<any> { +export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<Response> {
28-28
: Initializebody
toundefined
instead of an empty arrayThe
body
parameter is defaulting to an empty array[]
, which may not align with typical usage. Request bodies are usuallystring
,FormData
, orundefined
. Setting it toundefined
by default can prevent unintended behavior.Apply this diff to adjust the default value:
- body = [], + body,
79-79
: Address the TODO forFormData
supportThere's a TODO comment indicating the need to handle
FormData
in the request body. Implementing this will enhance the function's ability to handle various content types.I can help implement the
FormData
handling if you'd like. Do you want me to provide a code example or open a new GitHub issue to track this task?
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (9)
- app/client/platforms/alibaba.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/baidu.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/bytedance.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/google.ts (4 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/iflytek.ts (4 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/tencent.ts (4 hunks)
- app/store/sync.ts (1 hunks)
- app/utils/chat.ts (2 hunks)
- app/utils/stream.ts (1 hunks)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- app/client/platforms/alibaba.ts
- app/client/platforms/baidu.ts
- app/client/platforms/bytedance.ts
- app/client/platforms/google.ts
- app/client/platforms/iflytek.ts
- app/client/platforms/tencent.ts
- app/store/sync.ts
- app/utils/chat.ts
π§° Additional context used
πͺ Biome
app/utils/stream.ts
[error] 39-39: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 64-64: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 30-30: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 64-64: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
Your build has completed! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-399
: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe main changes in this file involve updating the fetch implementation for Tauri. While the new implementation simplifies the process, it also removes some important features like timeout handling and flexible response type handling.
Key recommendations:
- Reintroduce timeout handling to prevent issues with long-running requests.
- Implement flexible response handling to support different data types (e.g., JSON, text).
- Improve error handling for network issues and non-200 status codes.
- Verify that all uses of the fetch function throughout the codebase are compatible with the new implementation.
- Ensure that the
ServiceProvider
import is necessary and used correctly.Before merging this PR, it's crucial to thoroughly test the new fetch implementation with various API endpoints and response types to ensure it maintains the functionality of the previous implementation while addressing the identified issues.
Consider creating a separate utility function for Tauri-specific fetch operations. This would allow for better separation of concerns and easier maintenance of platform-specific code:
function tauriFetch(url: string, options?: Record<string, unknown>): Promise<any> { // Implement Tauri-specific fetch logic here } export function fetch(url: string, options?: Record<string, unknown>): Promise<any> { if (window.__TAURI__) { return tauriFetch(url, options); } return window.fetch(url, options); }This approach would make it easier to manage and update Tauri-specific fetch logic in the future.
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (5)
- app/client/platforms/iflytek.ts (4 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/moonshot.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/platforms/openai.ts (2 hunks)
- app/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- src-tauri/src/stream.rs (1 hunks)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- app/client/platforms/iflytek.ts
- app/client/platforms/moonshot.ts
- app/client/platforms/openai.ts
- src-tauri/src/stream.rs
π Additional comments (2)
app/utils.ts (2)
5-7
: Verify the impact of import changes on the codebase.The changes in imports suggest a shift from Tauri's HTTP fetch to a custom stream fetch implementation. This could have implications on how network requests are handled throughout the application.
- Ensure that the new
tauriStreamFetch
function from "./utils/stream" is compatible with the previoustauriFetch
implementation.- Verify that all uses of the previous
tauriFetch
function have been updated to use the newtauriStreamFetch
function.- Check if the
ServiceProvider
import is used in this file or if it's needed for type checking purposes.To confirm the usage of these imports, run the following script:
296-311
:β οΈ Potential issueReview the new fetch implementation for potential issues.
The new implementation using
tauriStreamFetch
simplifies the fetch process but removes some important configurations:
- Timeout handling: The previous implementation used
REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS
, which is now removed. This could lead to issues with long-running requests.- Response type handling: The new implementation always converts the response to text, which might not be suitable for all API responses (e.g., JSON or binary data).
- Error handling: The new implementation doesn't seem to handle network errors or non-200 status codes explicitly.
Consider addressing these points to improve robustness:
- Reintroduce timeout handling:
const timeout = (options?.timeout as number) || REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS; return Promise.race([ tauriStreamFetch(url, options), new Promise((_, reject) => setTimeout(() => reject(new Error('Request timed out')), timeout)) ]);
- Add flexible response handling:
.then(res => options?.responseType === 'json' ? res.json() : res.text())
- Improve error handling:
.then(res => { if (!res.ok) throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${res.status}`); return res; })To ensure these changes don't break existing functionality, run the following script:
β Verification successful
Verified the fetch implementation changes in
app/utils.ts
.The new implementation removes
timeout
andresponseType
configurations solely withinapp/utils.ts
. No other parts of the codebase are using these options with thefetch
function.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for uses of the fetch function in the codebase rg --type typescript 'fetch\(' app/Length of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for uses of the fetch function in TypeScript files within the app/ directory rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'fetch\(' app/Length of output: 4514
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for fetch calls with 'timeout' or 'responseType' options in TypeScript files within the app/ directory rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'fetch\([^)]*(timeout|responseType)[^)]*\)' app/Length of output: 166
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/utils/stream.ts (3)
79-79
: Implement handling for FormData in the request bodyThere's a TODO comment indicating that
FormData
handling is not yet implemented. To ensure thefetch
function can processFormData
types, consider implementing this functionality.Would you like me to help implement the handling of
FormData
for the request body, or open a new GitHub issue to track this task?
67-68
: Consider making the 'Accept-Language' header dynamicThe
Accept-Language
header is currently hardcoded. For better internationalization support, consider deriving this value from the user's language preferences.Apply this diff to use the user's preferred languages:
- "Accept-Language": "en-US,en;q=0.9,zh-CN;q=0.8,zh;q=0.7", + "Accept-Language": navigator.languages + ? navigator.languages.join(', ') + : navigator.language || "en-US",This approach uses
navigator.languages
to include all preferred languages, falling back tonavigator.language
if unavailable.
22-22
: Specify a more precise return type for the fetch functionThe return type is currently defined as
Promise<any>
. For better type safety and code clarity, consider specifying the return type asPromise<Response>
.Apply this diff to update the function signature:
-export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<any> { +export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<Response> {
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (3)
- app/store/access.ts (2 hunks)
- app/utils.ts (3 hunks)
- app/utils/stream.ts (1 hunks)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- app/store/access.ts
- app/utils.ts
π§° Additional context used
πͺ Biome
app/utils/stream.ts
[error] 39-39: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 64-64: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 30-30: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 64-64: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
looks better |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)
Line range hint
117-131
: Great updates to the Roadmap!The roadmap changes effectively communicate project progress and future direction:
- Completed items are clearly marked, showing active development.
- New items like plugins and local knowledge base demonstrate ongoing innovation.
- The roadmap covers a wide range of features, from UI improvements to advanced AI capabilities.
Consider adding estimated timeframes or priority levels for the upcoming features to give users a better idea of the development timeline.
Line range hint
133-141
: Excellent addition of the What's New section!This new section effectively communicates recent updates and improvements:
- It provides a quick overview of key features in recent versions.
- The use of version numbers helps users track changes.
- Highlighting major features (like Tauri fetch API and plugin support) draws attention to significant improvements.
Consider adding links to relevant issues or pull requests for each update. This would allow users to dive deeper into the changes if they're interested.
Line range hint
235-368
: Comprehensive updates to Environment Variables!The additions to this section greatly enhance the configuration options:
- New variables for various AI providers (Google, Anthropic, Baidu, ByteDance, Alibaba, iFlytek) increase flexibility.
- Clear explanations for each variable help users understand their purpose.
- Options like
HIDE_USER_API_KEY
andDISABLE_GPT4
provide more control over the application's behavior.These changes make the application more versatile and easier to customize for different deployment scenarios.
Consider grouping related environment variables (e.g., all variables for a specific AI provider) under subheadings for better organization. This could improve readability, especially as the number of configuration options grows.
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (3)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- src-tauri/src/stream.rs (1 hunks)
- src-tauri/tauri.conf.json (1 hunks)
β Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src-tauri/tauri.conf.json
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src-tauri/src/stream.rs
π Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)
Line range hint
103-115
: Excellent additions to the Features section!The new features significantly enhance the application's capabilities and appeal:
- Support for self-deployed LLMs improves flexibility and customization options.
- Privacy-first approach with local data storage is a strong selling point.
- New prompt template feature (v2) adds powerful customization capabilities.
- Automatic compression of chat history is a smart solution for long conversations.
These additions make the application more versatile and user-friendly.
Line range hint
507-532
: Great update to the Special Thanks section!Keeping the list of sponsors up-to-date is crucial:
- It acknowledges the contributions of supporters.
- It demonstrates ongoing community engagement and support for the project.
- The clear criteria for inclusion (donations >= 100RMB) maintains transparency.
This update helps recognize the project's backers and may encourage further support.
Line range hint
1-532
: Overall, excellent updates to the README!The changes to this README file significantly enhance the project documentation:
- New features and roadmap items showcase the project's growth and future direction.
- The addition of the What's New section keeps users informed about recent updates.
- Expanded environment variables provide greater flexibility and customization options.
- Updated Special Thanks section acknowledges community support.
These improvements make the documentation more comprehensive, up-to-date, and user-friendly. Great job on maintaining and enhancing the project's documentation!
@lloydzhou By the way, regarding the CORS issue #5452, it is caused by directly using a browser, not actually by APIs from an HTTP Client. There is an alternative to fix it as well by reversing the proxy on the server-side written in Go. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (4)
- app/components/chat.tsx (1 hunks)
- app/store/chat.ts (1 hunks)
- app/utils.ts (3 hunks)
- app/utils/chat.ts (4 hunks)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- app/utils/chat.ts
π Additional comments (6)
app/utils.ts (2)
Line range hint
1-400
: Overall assessment of changes to app/utils.tsThe modifications in this file primarily focus on updating the fetch implementation to use Tauri's streaming API. While these changes align with the PR objectives, they introduce several points that require attention:
- The switch to
tauriStreamFetch
may affect the behavior of network requests throughout the application.- The simplification of the
fetch
function and changes to theadapter
function could impact error handling and response processing.- The consistent use of text responses in the
adapter
function might require updates in other parts of the application that expect JSON responses.To ensure a smooth transition and maintain robust functionality:
- Conduct thorough testing of all network requests in the application to verify they work correctly with the new implementation.
- Update documentation for the
fetch
andadapter
functions to reflect their new behavior.- Consider creating a migration guide for other developers working on the project, highlighting the changes in network request handling.
- Implement comprehensive error handling in the new fetch implementation to maintain or improve the robustness of the application.
To get an overview of the impact of these changes, run:
323-330
:β οΈ Potential issueReview changes in the adapter function for potential issues
The modifications to the
adapter
function introduce several important changes:
- The function now always sets
responseType
to "text", which might affect parts of the application expecting JSON responses.- The response is always converted to text, regardless of the actual content type.
- The previous status code checking for error responses has been removed.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add content type checking to handle different response types (e.g., JSON, text) appropriately.
- Reintroduce error handling for non-2xx status codes to maintain robust error management.
- Update the function's documentation to reflect its new behavior, especially regarding the text-only responses.
To ensure these changes don't introduce regressions, run:
β Verification successful
No issues found with the adapter function changes
Verification indicates that the
adapter
function is only utilized withinapp/utils.ts
and there are no instances where it expects JSON responses. Therefore, the recent modifications do not impact other parts of the application.π Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all uses of the adapter function rg --type typescript 'adapter\(' app/ # Check for any code that might be expecting JSON responses rg --type typescript 'adapter\(.*\.json\(\)' app/Length of output: 369
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all uses of the adapter function in TypeScript files find app/ -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" \) -exec rg 'adapter\(' {} + # Check for any code that might be expecting JSON responses in TypeScript files find app/ -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" \) -exec rg 'adapter\(.*\.json\(\)' {} +Length of output: 255
app/store/chat.ts (3)
40-40
: Approved: Enhanced error handling for chat message toolsThe addition of the optional
errorMsg
property to theChatMessageTool
type is a positive change. It allows for more detailed error reporting in chat message tools, which can improve debugging and user feedback capabilities.
Line range hint
1-1
: Summary: Improved error handling, awaiting further detailsThe changes to this file appear to focus on enhancing error handling capabilities in chat functionality. The addition of the
errorMsg
property toChatMessageTool
is a positive change. However, to complete the review, we need to see the actual changes to theonError
callback in theonUserInput
method. Once those changes are provided, we can ensure that the error handling improvements are implemented correctly and consistently.
Line range hint
1-1
: Request: Show changes toonError
callbackThe AI-generated summary mentions updates to the
onError
callback in theonUserInput
method to set theerrorMsg
property. However, these changes are not visible in the provided code snippet. To provide a thorough review, please show the actual code changes for theonError
callback.app/components/chat.tsx (1)
1818-1818
:β οΈ Potential issueEnsure error messages displayed in tooltips are user-friendly and safe
The addition of
title={tool?.errorMsg}
will display error messages as tooltips to users. Please verify thattool?.errorMsg
contains user-friendly, non-technical messages that do not expose sensitive information. This ensures a better user experience and maintains security best practices.Run the following script to review the content of
errorMsg
assignments:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
π§Ή Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/utils/stream.ts (1)
79-79
: ImplementFormData
supportThere is a TODO comment indicating that
FormData
support needs to be added. Implementing this would allow for form data submissions in thefetch
function.Would you like assistance in implementing
FormData
handling in thefetch
function?
π Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
π Files selected for processing (1)
- app/utils/stream.ts (1 hunks)
π§° Additional context used
πͺ Biome
app/utils/stream.ts
[error] 39-39: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 64-64: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 30-30: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
[error] 64-64: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
π Additional comments (5)
app/utils/stream.ts (5)
30-30
: Avoid usingFunction
as a type; explicitly define the function signature𧰠Tools
πͺ Biome
[error] 30-30: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
39-39
: Simplify function invocation using optional chaining𧰠Tools
πͺ Biome
[error] 39-39: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
48-48
: Avoid using@ts-ignore
; resolve the TypeScript error instead
64-64
: Avoid assignments within expressions for clarity𧰠Tools
πͺ Biome
[error] 64-64: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
[error] 64-64: Don't use 'Function' as a type.
Prefer explicitly define the function shape. This type accepts any function-like value, which can be a common source of bugs.
(lint/complexity/noBannedTypes)
71-73
: Simplify headers assignment using spread syntax
headers: Record<string, string>; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<any> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
π οΈ Refactor suggestion
Specify the return type as Promise<Response>
instead of Promise<any>
The function returns a Response
object, so specifying the return type as Promise<Response>
improves type safety and code clarity.
Apply this diff to update the return type:
-export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<any> {
+export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<Response> {
π Committable suggestion
βΌοΈ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<any> { | |
export function fetch(url: string, options?: RequestInit): Promise<Response> { |
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Updates
Chores