-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature reactive Cesium3DTileStyle.style object #7573
Merged
lilleyse
merged 10 commits into
CesiumGS:master
from
virtualcitySYSTEMS:feature-reactiveStyleObject
Mar 30, 2019
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
baf817a
Cesium3DTileStyle.style is reactive
bkuster e6f454e
handle empty style object
bkuster 3537582
setting of expressions on the style object
bkuster 3771fac
spec update
bkuster b3f8915
CHANGES.md
bkuster 4fc0b72
Merge branch 'master' into feature-reactiveStyleObject
6b576b1
.style update refactor
bkuster 32e5732
Merge remote-tracking branch 'original/master' into feature-reactiveS…
bkuster 65a39f3
getJsonFromExpression return custom expressions
bkuster 5f05495
added missing require to spec
bkuster File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe it would be better to separate getting the expression from setting the json. One idea:
A couple things to handle are:
this._style
would need to be initialized to an empty objectgetJsonFromExpression
return undefined in that case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the feedback @lilleyse. True, abusing
getExpression
in this fashion is not very intuitive, I like your proposal and will implement something along those lines.this._style
initialization in the constructor makes sense to me, but this would change a non-experimental API, as the default value for.style
would not longer beundefined
butObject
, or would you still returnundefined
in the getter, if the Object is empty?undefined
or the expression instance) have their uses. You cant serialize the expression, but you could use it to clone the style at runtime. I would lean toward an implementation that is closest to the current behavior, I'll have to checkout what that is first, but would assume it to beundefined
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changed my mind on 2.. Behavior as is now adds the custom expression passed in the options to
style
, this should remain unchanged. Added some specs to outline the behavior.