We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This was reported on the forum.
Supplying a terrainExaggeration seems to scale the normals incorrectly, causing the terrain to look washed out.
terrainExaggeration
Here is with terrainExaggeration: 1:
terrainExaggeration: 1
With terrainExaggeration: 2.5:
terrainExaggeration: 2.5
With terrainExaggeration: 4.5:
terrainExaggeration: 4.5
Sandcastle.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Congratulations on closing the issue! I found these Cesium forum links in the comments above:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/cesium-dev/H4NSHaavEdM/a8HQufXhAwAJ
If this issue affects any of these threads, please post a comment like the following:
The issue at #7580 has just been closed and may resolve your issue. Look for the change in the next stable release of Cesium or get it now in the master branch on GitHub https://github.com/AnalyticalGraphicsInc/cesium.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
This was reported on the forum.
Supplying a
terrainExaggeration
seems to scale the normals incorrectly, causing the terrain to look washed out.Here is with
terrainExaggeration: 1
:With
terrainExaggeration: 2.5
:With
terrainExaggeration: 4.5
:Sandcastle.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: