Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: #1102 Remove IntegrityError when using a released email to register #1176

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2017

Conversation

palanshagarwal
Copy link
Contributor

@palanshagarwal palanshagarwal commented Mar 2, 2017

Proposed changes in this pull request

Fixes #1102

Bug Description: Registering with an email that is no longer associated with an account throws an error.

Cause: When a new user registers, an EmailAddress (Model class in allauth.account.models) object is created and an email confirmation mail is sent. When the same user updates his/her email in the profile, the EmailAddress object associated with his User model was not being deleted which caused IntegrityError.

Solution: In clean_email method of ProfileForm class, delete any old instances of EmailAddress model for the current user if email is being updated.

When should this PR be merged

PR can be merged without any preconditions.

Risks

There are no risks from merging this pull request.

Follow up actions

No extra actions required.

Checklist (for reviewing)

General

  • Is this PR explained thoroughly? All code changes must be accounted for in the PR description.
  • Is the PR labeled correctly? It should have the migration label if a new migration is added.
  • Is the risk level assessment sufficient? The risks section should contain all risks that might be introduced with the PR and which actions we need to take to mitigate these risks. Possible risks are database migrations, new libraries that need to be installed or changes to deployment scripts.

Functionality

  • Are all requirements met? Compare implemented functionality with the requirements specification.
  • Does the UI work as expected? There should be no Javascript errors in the console; all resources should load. There should be no unexpected errors. Deliberately try to break the feature to find out if there are corner cases that are not handled.

Code

  • Do you fully understand the introduced changes to the code? If not ask for clarification, it might uncover ways to solve a problem in a more elegant and efficient way.
  • Does the PR introduce any inefficient database requests? Use the debug server to check for duplicate requests.
  • Are all necessary strings marked for translation? All strings that are exposed to users via the UI must be marked for translation.

Tests

  • Are there sufficient test cases? Ensure that all components are tested individually; models, forms, and serializers should be tested in isolation even if a test for a view covers these components.
  • If this is a bug fix, are tests for the issue in place There must be a test case for the bug to ensure the issue won’t regress. Make sure that the tests break without the new code to fix the issue.
  • If this is a new feature or a significant change to an existing feature has the manual testing spreadsheet been updated with instructions for manual testing?

Documentation

  • Are changes to the UI documented in the platform docs? If this PR introduces new platform site functionality or changes existing ones, the changes must be documented in the Cadasta Platform Documentation.
  • Are changes to the API documented in the API docs? If this PR introduces new API functionality or changes existing ones, the changes must be documented in the API docs.
  • Are reusable components documented? If this PR introduces components that are relevant to other developers (for instance a mixin for a view or a generic form) they should be documented in the Wiki.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 2, 2017

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@palanshagarwal
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bjohare I have updated the commit with tests and now Travis Build is passing successfully.

@bjohare
Copy link
Contributor

bjohare commented Mar 6, 2017

Hi @py-geek, thank you for your contribution. Your PR looks good. Please rebase onto the latest master and tidy up your PR description text by reformatting the bold sentence and completing the other sections of the PR template.

@palanshagarwal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @bjohare, Thank you for the review. I have updated the branch as per your suggestions.

@palanshagarwal palanshagarwal force-pushed the bugfix/#1102 branch 2 times, most recently from 49bc700 to 019a6c4 Compare March 7, 2017 10:14
@oliverroick oliverroick self-requested a review March 9, 2017 10:47
@oliverroick oliverroick merged commit 58e862b into Cadasta:master Mar 17, 2017
@palanshagarwal palanshagarwal deleted the bugfix/#1102 branch March 17, 2017 07:41
@palanshagarwal palanshagarwal restored the bugfix/#1102 branch March 17, 2017 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Registering with an email that is no longer associated with an account throws an error
4 participants