-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible to select "All Types" for relationship type #588
Comments
Actually, sorry no looking in the wrong place. It would seem to me there wouldn't be a tenure type "All Types". @fhpichel and @nastynoel can you confirm this? |
Correct. Can we take this opportunity to expand the list of possible relationship On Aug 24, 2016 02:57, "Kate Chapman" [email protected] wrote:
|
@nastynoel please open a new ticket for that. I've marked this as a bug and we should fix it as we have time. |
Remove AL entry from tenure relationship type list. Modify tests accordingly. Add data migration to convert any existing AL relationships to FH (freehold) and to remove the AL entry from the TenureRelationshipType table in the database.
Remove AL entry from tenure relationship type list. Modify tests accordingly. Add data migration to convert any existing AL relationships to FH (freehold) and to remove the AL entry from the TenureRelationshipType table in the database.
Fix #588: filter "All Types" from tenure type list
When you create a relationship for a location, it's possible to select "All Types" from the relationship type dropdown list. You then end up with a relationship with type "All Types". Is this really right? I would have thought that you need to select a specific relationship type.
(This is a result of https://github.com/Cadasta/cadasta-platform/blob/master/cadasta/party/models.py#L289.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: