Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Unification and printing for inout function types #344

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 12, 2024

Conversation

mark-koch
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #314

@mark-koch mark-koch requested a review from a team as a code owner July 29, 2024 15:45
@mark-koch mark-koch requested review from ss2165 and removed request for a team July 29, 2024 15:45
@mark-koch mark-koch mentioned this pull request Jul 29, 2024
Copy link
Member

@ss2165 ss2165 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.63%. Comparing base (4316ac9) to head (dcb5cb9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           feat/inout     #344      +/-   ##
==============================================
+ Coverage       91.47%   92.63%   +1.15%     
==============================================
  Files              47       45       -2     
  Lines            5300     5197     -103     
==============================================
- Hits             4848     4814      -34     
+ Misses            452      383      -69     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Base automatically changed from inout/parse to feat/inout August 9, 2024 10:42
@mark-koch mark-koch force-pushed the feat/inout branch 2 times, most recently from 5a72043 to 4316ac9 Compare August 9, 2024 10:53
@mark-koch mark-koch merged commit 2979256 into feat/inout Aug 12, 2024
2 checks passed
@mark-koch mark-koch deleted the inout/unify-print branch August 12, 2024 07:59
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2024
This is the dev branch for the inout argument feature (tracked by #282).

The idea is to allow explicit `@inout` annotations on function arguments
that "give back" the passed value after the function returns:

```python
@guppy
def foo(q: qubit @inout) -> None: ...

@guppy
def bar(q1: qubit @inout, q2: qubit @inout) -> bool: ...

@guppy
def main() -> None:
   q1, q2 = qubit(), qubit()
   foo(q1)          # Desugars to `q1 = foo(q1)`
   x = bar(q1, q2)  # Desugars to `q1, q2, x = bar(q1, q2)`
   y = bar(q1, q1)  # Error: Linearity violation, q1 used twice
```

To enable this, we need to enforce that `@inout` arguments are not moved
in the body of the function (apart from passing them in another `@inout`
position). This means that the argument will always be bound to the same
name and never aliased which allows us to desugar `@inout` functions
like

```python
@guppy
def bar(q1: qubit, q2: qubit) -> bool:
   [body]
   return [expr]
```

into

```python
@guppy
def bar(q1: qubit, q2: qubit) -> tuple[qubit, qubit, bool]:
   [body]
   return q1, q2, [expr]  # Linearity checker needs to ensure that q1, q2 are unused
```

Note that we only allow `@inout` annotations on linear types, since they
would be useless for classical ones (unless we also implement an
ownership system for classical values). Supporting them would make the
checking logic more complicated without providing any meaningful
benefit.

Tracked PRs:
* #315
* #316
* #349
* #344
* #321
* #331
* #350
* #339 
* #340
* #351
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


## [0.10.0](v0.9.0...v0.10.0)
(2024-09-11)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* Bumped the `hugr` dependency to `0.8.0`
* `GuppyModule.load` no longer loads the content of modules but instead
just brings the name of the module into scope. Use
`GuppyModule.load_all` to get the old behaviour.
* Removed `guppylang.hugr_builder.hugr.Hugr`, compiling a module returns
a `hugr.Package` instead.

### Features

* Add `__version__` field to guppylang
([#473](#473))
([b996c62](b996c62))
* Add angle type ([#449](#449))
([12e41e0](12e41e0))
* Add array literals
([#446](#446))
([a255c02](a255c02))
* Add equality test for booleans
([#394](#394))
([dd702ce](dd702ce)),
closes [#363](#363)
* Add pi constant ([#451](#451))
([9d35a78](9d35a78))
* Add qualified imports and make them the default
([#443](#443))
([553ec51](553ec51))
* Allow calling of methods
([#440](#440))
([5a59da3](5a59da3))
* Allow imports of function definitions and aliased imports
([#432](#432))
([e23b666](e23b666))
* Array indexing ([#415](#415))
([2199b48](2199b48)),
closes [#421](#421)
[#422](#422)
[#447](#447)
* Inout arguments ([#311](#311))
([060649b](060649b)),
closes [#315](#315)
[#316](#316)
[#349](#349)
[#344](#344)
[#321](#321)
[#331](#331)
[#350](#350)
[#340](#340)
[#351](#351)
* range() with single-argument
([#452](#452))
([d05f369](d05f369))
* Skip checking of redefined functions
([#457](#457))
([7f9ad32](7f9ad32))
* Support `nat`/`int` ↔ `bool` cast operations
([#459](#459))
([3b778c3](3b778c3))
* Use `hugr-cli` for validation
([#455](#455))
([1d0667b](1d0667b))
* Use cell name instead of file for notebook errors
([#382](#382))
([d542601](d542601))
* Use the hugr builder
([536abf9](536abf9))


### Bug Fixes

* Fix and update demo notebook
([#376](#376))
([23b2a15](23b2a15))
* Fix linearity checking bug
([#441](#441))
([0b8ea21](0b8ea21))
* Fix struct definitions in notebooks
([#374](#374))
([b009465](b009465))


### Documentation

* Update readme, `cargo build` instead of `--extra validation`
([#471](#471))
([c2a4c86](c2a4c86))


### Miscellaneous Chores

* Update hugr to `0.8.0`
([#454](#454))
([b02e0d0](b02e0d0))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants