EASI-4649 Upgrade vite & vitest

[adamodd]

EASI-4649

Description

• Bumps up vite and vitest to current
• Adds github actions reporter to client test

Note

There was an attempt to change package.json type to module, but this was reverted and on hold because some dependencies and confs still rely on commonjs.

How to test this change

Reinstall npm packages and expect business as usual.

yarn install
yarn test
yarn start
yarn cypress:run

PR Author Checklist

• I have provided a detailed description of the changes in this PR.
• I have provided clear instructions on how to test the changes in this PR.
• I have updated tests or written new tests as appropriate in this PR.

PR Reviewer Guidelines

• It's best to pull the branch locally and test it, rather than just looking at the code online!
• When approving a PR, provide a reason why you're approving it
  • e.g. "Approving because I tested it locally and all functionality works as expected"
  • e.g. "Approving because the change is simple and matches the Figma design"
• Don't be afraid to leave comments or ask questions, especially if you don't understand why something was done! (This is often a great time to suggest code comments or documentation updates)
• Check that all code is adequately covered by tests - if it isn't feel free to suggest the addition of tests.

[adamodd]

This is in a good spot for meeting requirements, but just taking a little more time to see if other related upgrades should fit in.

[ClayBenson94]

@adamodd would you mind (I know it's a bit of an odd request) pushing up a purposefully failing client test? I think that's the only time the new --reporter=github-actions will actually create anything for us to see 👀

Once the tests run, we can probably just revert the commit!

[adamodd]

Force break is in but still don't see any UI hook to the error.
I'm guessing we need to set process.env.GITHUB_ACTIONS === 'true'
https://vitest.dev/guide/reporters#github-actions-reporter

How much would we actually use this since broken client tests should be blocked by our pre commit hook?

[adamodd]

Reverted reporting attempts because they failed

[ClayBenson94]

Changes look good and all seem to work as expected!