-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
polar plot in isofill is not an option and isoline polar plot has wrong tic marks #729
Comments
Yes, we need to get the appropriate template for the different projections. I will need to talk to Charles to see if I can find a really old version of the initial.attributes file around with all the saved templates then see if we can't get them to work again in the new v2.0 for backward compatibility. -Dean From: potter2 <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> see attached. Notice the menu for polar in isofill is missing and the tic marks on the isofill shouldn't be on the box. — |
yes that will need some serious reworking of the template ticks drawing. I think for 2.0 we should probably just not draw the ticks/ticklabels then does that sound right? |
I just got a call from a friend of mine at the University of Michigan. They want to use UVCDAT in a class. They need it by next Thursday. Just a little added pressure ;-) Jerry Gerald (Jerry) Potter |
it's not just a matter of templates, we need to "project" the ticks as well and the labels, it used to be hard-coded into the vcs C code, now the template is drawn via python (template.py) so we will need to re-implement all this. Is turning off on projected plots OK for 2.0, and then do it correctly for 2.1 |
moving this to 2.3 because I think it's going to be redone when we re-implement the VTK filters. |
works on master |
see attached. Notice the menu for polar in isofill is missing and the tic marks on the isofill shouldn't be on the box.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: