Internal DB enrichment performance improvements

[mike12345567]

Description

This PR really provides one major change to the enrich endpoint and then makes some minor adjustments to the link system to try and improve efficiency of the calls.

In general, this is pretty much as optimised as it can be - this does not make any headway to improving the self call, but there is very little we can do there as we don't know the scope of what is needed from the user structure - if it is a heavily modified user table (with a lot of relationships) we cannot improve the speed of this.

The biggest change here is that when the data provider requests a to enrich a row, it doesn't need all of the columns that come back, it generally only looks at a single field. In fact within the API functions of frontend-core it strips out everything else it gets back, so this is wasted if it is retrieved. I've added a field query string parameter to the enrich GET call which allows restricting the call down to exactly what the data provider needs, significantly improving the performance of this call.

Below is a before and after on a local network, note the difference in size as well, this makes a big difference in our cloud platform where the size creates extra latency ontop of the actual work done in the request.

Screenshots

Before (enrichment call)

After (enrichment call)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #11981 (44c6401) into master (f1f706b) will increase coverage by 0.23%.
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 76.52%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11981      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.38%   74.62%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files         326      326              
  Lines       13941    13925      -16     
  Branches     2937     2923      -14     
==========================================
+ Hits        10370    10391      +21     
+ Misses       3330     3299      -31     
+ Partials      241      235       -6     

Files	Coverage Δ
packages/server/src/api/controllers/row/index.ts	97.81% <ø> (ø)
...ackages/server/src/api/controllers/row/internal.ts	86.99% <100.00%> (+1.83%)	⬆️
packages/server/src/api/controllers/row/utils.ts	78.12% <100.00%> (+48.95%)	⬆️
packages/server/src/api/controllers/user.ts	86.95% <100.00%> (-0.28%)	⬇️
packages/server/src/db/linkedRows/index.ts	96.63% <100.00%> (+0.37%)	⬆️
...ackages/server/src/utilities/rowProcessor/index.ts	69.65% <100.00%> (ø)
...es/server/src/api/controllers/row/staticFormula.ts	36.70% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/server/src/api/controllers/table/index.ts	69.14% <0.00%> (ø)
packages/server/src/sdk/app/rows/utils.ts	75.94% <75.00%> (-0.68%)	⬇️
packages/server/src/db/linkedRows/linkUtils.ts	84.37% <66.66%> (-3.77%)	⬇️
... and 2 more

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[shogunpurple]

LGTM! Nice work