We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
With the installer for 68.0b1 on Windows, where (a) Waterfox Classic is installed and (b) the user has admin privileges (i.e. can overwrite Classic):
However:
Upgrade is too risky a default.
Assume that if the user has Waterfox Classic, the user will want to retain Waterfox Classic (alongside Waterfox Current).
A fix might involve defaulting to a different directory e.g.
C:\Program Files\Waterfox Current
If the signed in user lacks privileges to write to the above path, then e.g.
%APPDATA%\Local\Waterfox Current
– compare with the 68.0b1 default:
…
Is it possible to have drag-and-drop installation of a distinctively-named bundle e.g.
Waterfox Current.app
– with the generic, non-distinctive name Waterfox for the running application?
Maybe possible, but from an accessibility perspective I don't like the idea.
Meta, tracking: #538
#983
#1152
#1142 – if an unwanted upgrade occurs, then the Waterfox Current first run UX may be poor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Maybe just change in mozconfig => ac_add_options --with-app-name=waterfox to ac_add_options --with-app-name=waterfox-current.
ac_add_options --with-app-name=waterfox
ac_add_options --with-app-name=waterfox-current
Sorry, something went wrong.
This change already fixes this, as this is what the installer code references for which path to use.
Fix confirmed, thanks.
Quick test routine (on Windows 10):
No branches or pull requests
With the installer for 68.0b1 on Windows, where (a) Waterfox Classic is installed and (b) the user has admin privileges (i.e. can overwrite Classic):
However:
Upgrade is too risky a default.
Assume that if the user has Waterfox Classic, the user will want to retain Waterfox Classic (alongside Waterfox Current).
Windows
A fix might involve defaulting to a different directory e.g.
C:\Program Files\Waterfox Current
If the signed in user lacks privileges to write to the above path, then e.g.
%APPDATA%\Local\Waterfox Current
– compare with the 68.0b1 default:
Linux
…
Mac OS X
Is it possible to have drag-and-drop installation of a distinctively-named bundle e.g.
Waterfox Current.app
– with the generic, non-distinctive name Waterfox for the running application?
Maybe possible, but from an accessibility perspective I don't like the idea.
Related
Meta, tracking: #538
#983
#1152
#1142 – if an unwanted upgrade occurs, then the Waterfox Current first run UX may be poor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: