Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

510 nurikabe tests #539

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 25, 2023
Merged

Conversation

walkingjason
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Several Nurikabe unit tests were previously commented out, presumably because they were failing and blocking the build. This PR resolves this problem.

Closes #(510)

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Enhancement (improvement to an already existing feature)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

How Has This Been Tested?

All unit tests pass.

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if applicable)
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

These tests were initially commented out. This commit uncomments the tests and fixed all errors
This test was failing because there was only one black cell on the test board. Another reachable cell was added so the rule can be successfully applied.
The contradiction rule works for point (0, 1). This point was added to the "assertNull" list of points
The test failed on the original board because there is no black cells. The contradiction test it is checking against, isolatedBlackContradictionRule, requires at least one black cell.
@charlestian23
Copy link
Collaborator

Have you verified if these tests work? Like are these tests written correctly or did you simply just uncomment them?

@charlestian23 charlestian23 self-assigned this Apr 17, 2023
@walkingjason
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Have you verified if these tests work? Like are these tests written correctly or did you simply just uncomment them?

I have. But right now some lightup rules are failing the checkstyle.

@charlestian23 charlestian23 merged commit b1214c7 into Bram-Hub:dev Apr 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants