Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libsonata has in the process of refactoring its module #123

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2024

Conversation

mgeplf
Copy link
Contributor

@mgeplf mgeplf commented Feb 1, 2024

* make this forwards and backwards compatible
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: 22 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (6d0289c) 85.14% compared to head (7c1443c) 85.11%.
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
bluecellulab/cell/core.py 42.85% 8 Missing ⚠️
bluecellulab/circuit/config/sections.py 57.14% 3 Missing ⚠️
bluecellulab/cell/plotting.py 60.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
bluecellulab/cell/stimuli_generator.py 86.66% 2 Missing ⚠️
bluecellulab/simulation/neuron_globals.py 77.77% 2 Missing ⚠️
bluecellulab/synapse/synapse_types.py 77.77% 2 Missing ⚠️
bluecellulab/psegment.py 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
bluecellulab/simulation/simulation.py 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
bluecellulab/tools.py 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #123      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.14%   85.11%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          78       78              
  Lines        5344     5356      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         4550     4559       +9     
- Misses        794      797       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@anilbey anilbey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good to me, thanks!

mgeplf added a commit to BlueBrain/libsonata that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2024
* CircuitConfig, NodeSets, and SimulationConfig didn't have a top level
  docstring and thus sphinx `automodule` wasn't displaying them

* Many of the SimulationConfig were rooted in _libsonata, when they
  should be in SimulationConfig; this was refactored, however it has
  implications in the following projects:

* BlueCelluLab was update to work around the change
    BlueBrain/BlueCelluLab#123

* SNAP tests have been updated to handle the different locations of
  SimulationConfig classes:
    BlueBrain/snap#254
@anilbey anilbey merged commit cbdac33 into BlueBrain:main Feb 5, 2024
7 checks passed
mgeplf added a commit to BlueBrain/libsonata that referenced this pull request Feb 7, 2024
* CircuitConfig, NodeSets, and SimulationConfig didn't have a top level
  docstring and thus sphinx `automodule` wasn't displaying them

* Many of the SimulationConfig were rooted in _libsonata, when they
  should be in SimulationConfig; this was refactored, however it has
  implications in the following projects:

* BlueCelluLab was update to work around the change
    BlueBrain/BlueCelluLab#123

* SNAP tests have been updated to handle the different locations of
  SimulationConfig classes:
    BlueBrain/snap#254
mgeplf added a commit to BlueBrain/libsonata that referenced this pull request Feb 23, 2024
* CircuitConfig, NodeSets, and SimulationConfig didn't have a top level
  docstring and thus sphinx `automodule` wasn't displaying them

* Many of the SimulationConfig were rooted in _libsonata, when they
  should be in SimulationConfig; this was refactored, however it has
  implications in the following projects:

* BlueCelluLab was update to work around the change
    BlueBrain/BlueCelluLab#123

* SNAP tests have been updated to handle the different locations of
  SimulationConfig classes:
    BlueBrain/snap#254
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants