Add analyzer and operator parameters to match_bool_prefix

[MaxKsyunz]

Description

These were flagged as missing in the upstream PR opensearch-project#634.

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass, including unit test, integration test and doctest
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
  • New functionality has user manual doc added
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[Yury-Fridlyand]

Is it worth testing the function with all parameters in FilterQueryBuilderTest.java and in MatchBoolPrefixIT.java?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #72 (111a8e6) into integ-match_bool_prefix-#187 (9b0eeb9) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@                       Coverage Diff                       @@
##             integ-match_bool_prefix-#187      #72   +/-   ##
===============================================================
  Coverage                           97.67%   97.67%           
- Complexity                           2754     2756    +2     
===============================================================
  Files                                 269      269           
  Lines                                6789     6791    +2     
  Branches                              435      435           
===============================================================
+ Hits                                 6631     6633    +2     
  Misses                                157      157           
  Partials                                1        1           

Flag	Coverage Δ
sql-engine	97.67% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
.../filter/lucene/relevance/MatchBoolPrefixQuery.java	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0bcc123...111a8e6. Read the comment docs.

[Yury-Fridlyand]

Please, update docs too.

[MaxKsyunz]

Is it worth testing the function with all parameters in FilterQueryBuilderTest.java and in MatchBoolPrefixIT.java?

Yes, I think so.

I would like to do that in separate PRs -- one for FilterQueryBuilderTest that will add test cases for all other optional parameters for match_bool_prefix, and another PR for MatchBoolPrefixIT after I update from upstream and can use the brewing dataset.