Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added listBurnHistory RPC #444

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Jul 25, 2021
Merged

Conversation

Jouzo
Copy link
Contributor

@Jouzo Jouzo commented Jul 6, 2021

What kind of PR is this?:

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Adds listBurnHistory RPC

Which issue(s) does this PR fixes?:

Fixes missing RPC implementation in #48

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 6, 2021

✔️ Deploy Preview for jellyfish-defi ready!

🔨 Explore the source changes: 1565440

🔍 Inspect the deploy log: https://app.netlify.com/sites/jellyfish-defi/deploys/60f969144333a900074c8a99

😎 Browse the preview: https://deploy-preview-444--jellyfish-defi.netlify.app

@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Jul 6, 2021

Code Climate has analyzed commit 1565440 and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

View more on Code Climate.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 6, 2021

size-limit report 📦

Path Size Loading time (3g) Running time (snapdragon) Total time
packages/jellyfish/dist/index.umd.js 21.36 KB (+0.13% 🔺) 428 ms (+0.13% 🔺) 215 ms (+6.45% 🔺) 643 ms

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 6, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #444 (1565440) into main (ad6e422) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #444   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.31%   97.31%           
=======================================
  Files         105      105           
  Lines        3052     3056    +4     
  Branches      378      379    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         2970     2974    +4     
  Misses         82       82           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ackages/jellyfish-api-core/src/category/account.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ad6e422...1565440. Read the comment docs.

@Jouzo Jouzo marked this pull request as draft July 6, 2021 15:48
@Jouzo Jouzo marked this pull request as ready for review July 7, 2021 06:25
Jouzo and others added 3 commits July 12, 2021 13:55
@Jouzo Jouzo requested a review from siradji July 12, 2021 12:06
@Jouzo Jouzo requested a review from canonbrother July 16, 2021 13:56
Copy link
Contributor

@canonbrother canonbrother left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that still have the duplicated tests but since its added i just ignore it
overall i'm good

@Jouzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jouzo commented Jul 19, 2021

Are you talking about the filter by token type @canonbrother ?

@canonbrother
Copy link
Contributor

Are you talking about the filter by token type @canonbrother ?

yes the txtype filter, both txtype filter tests are considered same condition

@Jouzo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jouzo commented Jul 19, 2021

you're right, let me fix it

Copy link
Contributor

@aikchun aikchun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For assertions that uses .every, since the return type is a boolean, we should probably use .toBe(true) or .toStrictEqual(true), instead of toBeTruthy to be more definitive on what we're testing for.

@fuxingloh fuxingloh dismissed stale reviews from canonbrother and siradji July 25, 2021 19:14

stale

@fuxingloh fuxingloh merged commit 102aa0b into main Jul 25, 2021
@fuxingloh fuxingloh deleted the jouzo/rpc_accounts/listBurnHistory branch July 25, 2021 19:14
canonbrother pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature New feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants