Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade nodemailer from 6.9.10 to 6.9.15 #4

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: bader
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Bader-Idris
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade nodemailer from 6.9.10 to 6.9.15.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 5 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 2 months ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
high severity Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-7361793
761 Proof of Concept
Release notes
Package name: nodemailer from nodemailer GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade nodemailer from 6.9.10 to 6.9.15.

See this package in npm:
nodemailer

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/bader-idris/project/a1d1e95a-6b34-4078-aa93-073013de594d?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

MIME: GeoJSON mapping
2 participants