This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 24, 2019. It is now read-only.
replace OCLint report parser implementation #61
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
the OCLint report parser implementation was relying on deprecated functionality, e.g. `StaxParser`, issue builder, etc. and in this instance it seemed easier to just rewrite rather than to update. the previous implementation also did not seem to parse a valid or up-of-date OCLint report, which caused the sensor to not report anything to sonarqube.
the `org.sonar.api.batch.Sensor` have been deprecated and should be replaced by `org.sonar.api.batch.sensor.Sensor`.
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the OCLint report parser implementation is relying on deprecated functionality, e.g.
StaxParser, issue builder, etc. and did not seem to parse a valid, or up-to-date, report format which caused the sensor to not report anything to SonarQube.the implementation have been replaced since it seemed easier, faster, and would result in a better implementation.
this should, at least in part, solve #57.