s2t converts “背包” to “揹包,” but t2s or tw2s doesn’t do the opposite

[NaitLee]

The definition of “揹”-included phrases (of s2t) are around here.

But there isn’t 揹 背 in TSCharacters.txt.

To reproduce:

$ echo "背包" | opencc -c s2t.json | opencc -c t2s.json
揹包

AFAIK there isn’t any usage of “揹” in Simplified Chinese. So please add “背” as a simplification :)

Notes:
It seems that “揹” is just a variation of “背”, in/for both Traditional and Simplified Chinese.
Both “揹” and “背” are seen in Web search results (of sites that use Traditional Chinese). So that both are correct, anyway.

[ayaka14732]

「揹」就是異體字，建議刪除

[NaitLee]

根據 OpenCC 「能分則不合」的原則，像「揹」這樣算是細分用法的字其實合乎邏輯。
據此處，「揹」算作傳統字。
但一些字典（如這裏）說爲異體字。據說《康熙字典》《說文解字》均未收錄此字。
「背」下部從「肉」，可指肩膀與後背，動詞上已經有「負荷」的含義。根據這邏輯可能「揹」要算異體。
從相關互聯網搜索（多爲港、臺網店商品）來看，「背包」和「揹包」都有使用。
具體作何決策還待專家考察 😄

不管怎樣，需要爲 t2s 添加此組合：簡體不使用「揹」，若出現則需要替換掉。

[danny0838]

《通用規範漢字表》中有列出「背」是規範字，「揹」是異體字。OpenCC 所謂的簡體字就是中國規範字，按此原則上應將《通用規範漢字表》中的異體字轉為規範字。

除了此字以外，還有一大堆可以按相同原則轉為規範字的異體字。我很久以前就在 #492 提過 PR，但當時老大說要再研議，不曉得目前考慮得如何了……。