Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

boost-eigen branch doesn't build on OSX 10.7, 10.9 (10.8 untested) #122

Closed
shelhamer opened this issue Feb 17, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@shelhamer
Copy link
Member

Post #97 boost-eigen does not build on OSX 10.9 (< 10.9 is untested) because of an odd CUDA and boost conflict. See #97 (comment).

Ideally, this will be fixed before the integration to master.

@shelhamer
Copy link
Member Author

Potential fix: split cpp/cu layer implementations. Also a step toward a cpu-only build of Caffe. (Clarification: Caffe works fine in cpu-only mode now, but the cuda libraries are still needed for build.)

@tdomhan
Copy link
Contributor

tdomhan commented Feb 24, 2014

splitting caffe into cpp/cu parts would be a incredibly helpful feature. especially with all the cuda issues in Mavericks 10.9, it would be nice to be able to build caffe without cuda support.

@sguada
Copy link
Contributor

sguada commented Feb 27, 2014

@shelhamer it doesn't build in OSX 10.7 either

shelhamer added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2014
Split source files between CUDA and CPU code. Pave the way for #3 and #122.
@shelhamer
Copy link
Member Author

While #152 was hoped to fix this, it does not. However, it makes #3 easier, which would be a reasonable workaround.

@shelhamer
Copy link
Member Author

While this isn't yet solved, it is understood and documented at the crucial PR #165 so I'm closing this to focus the conversation.

mitmul pushed a commit to mitmul/caffe that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2014
Split source files between CUDA and CPU code. Pave the way for BVLC#3 and BVLC#122.
thatguymike pushed a commit to thatguymike/caffe that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants