Adding ToUnit methods

[JosefTaylor]

NOTE: Depends on

Issues addressed by this PR

Closes #51
Partially addresses UI Issue 128

Test files

https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:f:/r/sites/BHoM/02_Current/12_Scripts/02_Pull%20Request/BHoM/Localisation_Toolkit/Units_Engine/%2376-Add%20ToUnit()%20and%20FromUnit()?csf=1&web=1&e=a4z6Ts

Changelog

Additional comments

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following checks are now queued:

• code-compliance
• documentation-compliance
• project-compliance
• branch-compliance
• dataset-compliance
• copyright-compliance

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check compliance

[JosefTaylor]

For string matching, could also check if the string is one of the enum names, to reduce number of strings we have to add to the switch-case.
I'd also thought about converting other enums (such as Midas, XML, other toolkits which have units enums) to strings, but the code wasn't super clean so I haven't yet. Also, suspect those will want to be removed once this is merged.

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check branch-compliance
• check dataset-compliance
• check copyright-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor fix requested for project compliance.

The errors with the CSProject (.csproj) files have been recorded as annotations on the checks tab.

I will apply the fixes to every case detailed on the checks tab with the exception of any references to the target framework. I am unable to provide fixes to the Target Framework automatically, these will need to be performed manually. If you want to perform the fixes in a different manner please resolve this manually and rerun the check.

If you are happy for me to go ahead and perform this action, please reply with:

@BHoMBot fix project file ref. 7324564983

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot fix project file ref. 7324564983

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor I have queued up your request to fix the csproj file(s). There are 0 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor I am now going to fix the CSProject compliance in accordance with the annotations previously made.

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm I have now resolved the CSProject compliance issues and pushed a commit to this Pull Request.

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check project-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check project-compliance

There are 5 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm I have now resolved the project compliance issues and pushed a commit to this Pull Request.

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check project-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check project-compliance

There are 5 requests in the queue ahead of you.

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check project-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check project-compliance

[JosefTaylor]

Hey @FraserGreenroyd, I'm also having some issues with Project Compliance- one, it wants me on the csproj new format, which I'd love to have some help with, and two, it's complaining about the post-build, which I believe is OK- it might just be there's some white space it didn't understand.
EDIT: no sooner than I'd sent this did project-compliance pass- I wouldn't mind updating to the new format, but for now I'll run the required checks and ask for reviews.

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check-required

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor sorry, I didn't understand.
Was that comment an instruction for me? If so, could you state again what check you would like me to do?
For a list of available instructions, please see this wiki page.

[JosefTaylor]

@michaelhoehn @peterjamesnugent would you mind reviewing? there's a nice big test script in the folder!

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check required

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check code-compliance
• check documentation-compliance
• check project-compliance
• check core
• check null-handling
• check serialisation
• check versioning
• check installer

[bhombot-ci]

The check project-compliance has already been run previously and recorded as a successful check. This check has not been run again at this time.

[FraserGreenroyd]

@JosefTaylor no worries, I think there's some teething problems with the post build check, @vietle-bh has been having trouble too. I'll be looking into it soon!
For the new project style, we can do a small workshop on that maybe as a use-case later in the milestone with @travispotterBH and @alexissantella perhaps? 😄

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check copyright-compliance dataset-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check copyright-compliance

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check dataset-compliance

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check dataset-compliance

[vietle-bh]

the new project style

Hi @FraserGreenroyd , I would like to join the new project style's workshop too 😎

[emidio-piermarini]

Reviewed and looks good for the ones which have had functionality

[emidio-piermarini]

Looks good for the ones that have functionality already. Suggest that we raise an issue to get units which currently have not support done.

[JosefTaylor]

@BHoMBot check ready-to-merge

[bhombot-ci]

@JosefTaylor to confirm, the following actions are now queued:

• check ready-to-merge

[JosefTaylor]

@FraserGreenroyd please merge if you're happy with it!

[JosefTaylor]

@emidio-piermarini agreed; it currently supports all the units we've done before with ToFoot(), ToKilopoundForce() etc., which I believe more than covers the QuantityType attributes we've implemented, but there are many more compound units which could be added!
This also leaves room for adding nicknames to units, which could be done by anyone as needed