-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removed auto-constructors for finicky objects #135
Removed auto-constructors for finicky objects #135
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some minor changes needed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Project compliance will fail so let's get the bot to fix that after Typology
.
@BHoMBot check project-compliance
@BHoMBot check project-compliance |
@Tom-Kingstone to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
There are 11 requests in the queue ahead of you. |
@FraserGreenroyd fix requested for project compliance. The errors with the CSProject ( I will apply the fixes to every case detailed on the checks tab with the exception of any references to the target framework. I am unable to provide fixes to the Target Framework automatically, these will need to be performed manually. If you want to perform the fixes in a different manner please resolve this manually and rerun the check. If you are happy for me to go ahead and perform this action, please reply with:
|
@BHoMBot fix project file ref. 18659371395 |
@FraserGreenroyd I have queued up your request to fix the |
@FraserGreenroyd I am now going to fix the project compliance in accordance with the annotations previously made. |
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm I have now resolved the project compliance issues and pushed a commit to this Pull Request. |
@BHoMBot check compliance |
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
There are 2 requests in the queue ahead of you. |
@Tom-Kingstone to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
There are 1 requests in the queue ahead of you. |
The check |
The check |
The check |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All good on code review with comments resolved, thanks @Tom-Kingstone for picking up the additional NoAutoConstructor
discussed with @tg359 on Teams.
Happy to deploy for further testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approved as @FraserGreenroyd will set out
Co-authored-by: Fraser Greenroyd <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Fraser Greenroyd <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Fraser Greenroyd <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Fraser Greenroyd <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Fraser Greenroyd <[email protected]>
b5bc6dc
0a8359f
to
b5bc6dc
Compare
@FraserGreenroyd to confirm, the following actions are now queued:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reapproving based on this comment following a rebase to resolve conflicts.
The check |
The check |
The check |
@BHoMBot this is a DevOps instruction. I am requesting neutral checks on: installer, unit-tests, ready-to-merge |
@FraserGreenroyd I have provided neutral checks to the checks requested. These checks will need to be run properly to obtain full results. |
NOTE: Depends on
Issues addressed by this PR
Closes #131
[NoAutoConstructor]
added to objects where they are either created via a process, or have some validation required in order to be suitable for use in downstream processes.Test files
Changelog
Additional comments