Reflection_Engine - Issue 703 - Fix Depth of Arrays in UnderlyingType #1124
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
epignatelli
added
severity:critical
This was referenced Aug 1, 2019
adecler
approved these changes
Aug 3, 2019
adecler
deleted the
Reflection_Engine-Issue#703-UnderlyingTypeArrayDepth
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issues addressed by this PR
Closes #703
Engine.Reflection.Query.UnderlyingTypecurrently returns the wrong depth for array types, this pr solves it.Note: a multidimensional array (
int[,]) has depth of 1. A jagged array (int[][]) has depth equals to its nesting levels (2 in this case).Test files
https://burohappold.sharepoint.com/:f:/s/BHoM/EjmxIfvj4WNBvi9qWzVvunoBwjYJX03lohJTTu8WHAxAhA?e=5F10sa
Changelog
Engine.Reflection.Query.UnderlyingTypeto return the correct depth for theArraytype.