-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 298
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Bugs in new v12 Azure Storage #868
Fix Bugs in new v12 Azure Storage #868
Conversation
…zure#858) Co-authored-by: Abhineet Garg <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Abhineet Garg <[email protected]>
throw new ArgumentException("Missing blob container", nameof(blobUri)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
var builder = new BlobUriBuilder(blobUri); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I saw the library contains this very helpful class
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These changes look good to me. Just a couple tiny readability comments. Let me know if you need help debugging the failed entity test(s) that you mentioned in the PR description.
…nt as the instance and history tables (Azure#883)
/azp run |
Azure Pipelines could not run because the pipeline triggers exclude this branch/path. |
Looks like our CI pipeline isn't set up to properly work with PRs to feature branches. :-/ @wsugarman sorry that this PR fell off my radar. Do you feel that it's ready to be merged into the feature branch? I quickly reviewed the latest changes and it looks like they were mostly updates to keep parity with recent changes in |
@cgillum No problem! I've run the tests for the AzureStorage project locally, and everything passes. It should be good to merge into the feature branch. |
A few tests failed when updating Durable Task in the Durable Functions Extension. Includes the following changes:
main
MessageManager
TrackingServiceClientProvider
for the property of the same name in the orchestration service settings given that both blob and table clients are necessaryStorageAccountClientProvider
now derives from this new typeTableClient
without aUri
property, and so it must be computed using reflectionI made the following changes (plus tests). I also bumped the preview version:
/TrackingServiceClientProvider.cs
/Net/UriPath.cs
/Storage/Blob.cs
/Storage/BlobContainer.cs
/Storage/Queue.cs
/Storage/Table.cs
/Storage/TableClientExtensions.cs