Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add option for keda addon container-service - avm/res/container-service/managed-cluster #1691

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 18, 2024

Conversation

PixelRobots
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This is adding in the option to enable Keda on an AKS cluster.

I would probably do this one after #1682 as i used my main branch that has the cost anlayasis changes in it.

Pipeline Reference

Pipeline
avm.res.container-service.managed-cluster

Type of Change

  • Update to CI Environment or utlities (Non-module effecting changes)
  • Azure Verified Module updates:
    • Bugfix containing backwards compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in version.json:
      • Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes #{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
      • The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an issue to report it yet.
    • Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have bumped the MINOR version in version.json.
    • Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in version.json.
    • Update to documentation

Checklist

  • I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same update/change
  • I have run Set-AVMModule locally to generate the supporting module files.
  • My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without any errors or warnings

@PixelRobots PixelRobots requested review from a team as code owners April 17, 2024 14:20

Important

The "Needs: Triage 🔍" label must be removed once the triage process is complete!

Tip

For additional guidance on how to triage this issue/PR, see the BRM Issue Triage documentation.

Note

This label was added as per ITA06.

@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue labels Apr 17, 2024

Note

The "Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️" label was added as per ITA08BCP.

@PixelRobots PixelRobots changed the title Feat: add option for keda addon container-service feat: add option for keda addon container-service Apr 17, 2024
@ilhaan
Copy link
Member

ilhaan commented Apr 17, 2024

@PixelRobots The PR diff is showing changes from your cost-analysis PR as well. Can you please clean this up?

@ilhaan ilhaan self-assigned this Apr 17, 2024
@PixelRobots
Copy link
Contributor Author

That should be resolved now.

@ilhaan
Copy link
Member

ilhaan commented Apr 18, 2024

@PixelRobots code looks good now. Just need to get a green pipeline and we can merge this.

@PixelRobots
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's a strange one. One of the jobs keeps failing. All others are ok. I think it might be something I am doing but not an issue with the bicep.

Any ideas?

@matebarabas matebarabas changed the title feat: add option for keda addon container-service feat: add option for keda addon container-service - avm/res/container-service/managed-cluster Apr 18, 2024
@matebarabas matebarabas added Class: Resource Module 📦 This is a resource module and removed Needs: Triage 🔍 Maintainers need to triage still labels Apr 18, 2024
@PixelRobots
Copy link
Contributor Author

And we have green! Seems it was an Azure region and it was being slow or something.

@ilhaan ilhaan merged commit caf4262 into Azure:main Apr 18, 2024
5 checks passed
donk-msft pushed a commit to donk-msft/bicep-registry-modules that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
…r-service/managed-cluster` (Azure#1691)

## Description

This is adding in the option to enable Keda on an AKS cluster. 

I would probably do this one after
Azure#1682 as i used my
main branch that has the cost anlayasis changes in it.


<!--
>Thank you for your contribution !
> Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.
> Please also include the context.
> List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes Azure#123
Fixes Azure#456
Closes Azure#123
Closes Azure#456
-->

## Pipeline Reference

<!-- Insert your Pipeline Status Badge below -->

| Pipeline |
| -------- |
|
[![avm.res.container-service.managed-cluster](https://github.com/PixelRobots/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.container-service.managed-cluster.yml/badge.svg?branch=feat-Keda)](https://github.com/PixelRobots/bicep-registry-modules/actions/workflows/avm.res.container-service.managed-cluster.yml?query=branch%3Afeat-Keda)
|

## Type of Change

<!-- Use the check-boxes [x] on the options that are relevant. -->

- [ ] Update to CI Environment or utlities (Non-module effecting
changes)
- [X] Azure Verified Module updates:
- [ ] Bugfix containing backwards compatible bug fixes, and I have NOT
bumped the MAJOR or MINOR version in `version.json`:
- [ ] Someone has opened a bug report issue, and I have included "Closes
#{bug_report_issue_number}" in the PR description.
- [ ] The bug was found by the module author, and no one has opened an
issue to report it yet.
- [ ] Feature update backwards compatible feature updates, and I have
bumped the MINOR version in `version.json`.
- [ ] Breaking changes and I have bumped the MAJOR version in
`version.json`.
  - [ ] Update to documentation

## Checklist

- [X] I'm sure there are no other open Pull Requests for the same
update/change
- [X] I have run `Set-AVMModule` locally to generate the supporting
module files.
- [X] My corresponding pipelines / checks run clean and green without
any errors or warnings

<!-- Please keep up to day with the contribution guide at
https://aka.ms/avm/contribute/bicep -->

---------

Signed-off-by: PixelRobots <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Class: Resource Module 📦 This is a resource module Type: AVM 🅰️ ✌️ Ⓜ️ This is an AVM related issue
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants