[Resources] add generated files from Subscriptions 2021-01-01 #23144
Conversation
tjegbejimba
requested review from
allenjzhang,
archerzz,
ArcturusZhang,
fengzhou-msft,
m-nash,
markcowl and
yungezz
as code owners
|
hi @fengzhou-msft could you help review the PR? thanks |
|
@tjegbejimba there are some test failures, can you take a look? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tjegbejimba
Codes looks good. Please fix the error in pipeline. Thanks.
|
This pull request is protected by Check Enforcer. What is Check Enforcer?Check Enforcer helps ensure all pull requests are covered by at least one check-run (typically an Azure Pipeline). When all check-runs associated with this pull request pass then Check Enforcer itself will pass. Why am I getting this message?You are getting this message because Check Enforcer did not detect any check-runs being associated with this pull request within five minutes. This may indicate that your pull request is not covered by any pipelines and so Check Enforcer is correctly blocking the pull request being merged. What should I do now?If the check-enforcer check-run is not passing and all other check-runs associated with this PR are passing (excluding license-cla) then you could try telling Check Enforcer to evaluate your pull request again. You can do this by adding a comment to this pull request as follows: What if I am onboarding a new service?Often, new services do not have validation pipelines associated with them. In order to bootstrap pipelines for a new service, please perform following steps: For data-plane/track 2 SDKs Issue the following command as a pull request comment:
For track 1 management-plane SDKsPlease open a separate PR and to your service SDK path in this file. Once that PR has been merged, you can re-run the pipeline to trigger the verification. |
|
/check-enforcer reset |
|
/check-enforcer evaluate |
|
/check-enforcer reset |
|
/check-enforcer evaluate |
|
@archerzz Check-Enforcer seems to keep getting stuck. Could you please help resolve this? |
|
@fengzhou-msft I'm not sure why Check-Enforcer is stuck in "In progress" for days. Could you please help resolve this and merge the PR? Appreciate the help! |
|
@fengzhou-msft is there any additional changes required in this PR? Can we merge it if it looks good? |
|
/check-enforcer reset |
|
/check-enforcer evaluate |
|
/azp run net - mgmt - ci |
|
@viananth @tjegbejimba Would you mind if you could take a look at the broken tests? Thanks. |
|
/check-enforcer reset |
|
/check-enforcer evaluate |
|
/azp run net - mgmt - ci |
|
/check-enforcer reset |
|
/azp run net - mgmt - ci |
|
/azp run net - mgmt - ci |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run net - mgmt - ci |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
@viananth @tjegbejimba There are still some tests broken. Could you please take a look at it? Thanks. |
|
/azp run net - mgmt - ci |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
|
/azp run net - mgmt - ci |
|
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Release of microsoft.network api version: 2022 11 01 (Azure#23652) * Adds base for updating Microsoft.Network from version stable/2022-09-01 to version 2022-11-01 * Updates readme * Updates API version in new specs and examples * remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example (Azure#23144) * remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example * remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example2 * remove loadDistributionPolicy from appgw PUT request body example * remove duplicates * add private link configuration to see if it will fix validation error * remove privateLinkConfig related * revert changes to see if still get validation error * update back to original changes * add response resource id to fix modelValidation error * add connection resource * Selector in Exclusions should not be required as Operator EqualsAny does not need a Selector (Azure#23184) * Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes (Azure#23021) * Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes * Fixing lint errors * Updated rate limit feature examples * Fix for applicationGatewayIpConfigurations property and make the priority parameter as required for NSG (Azure#23210) * Fix for applicationGatewayIpConfigurations property This swagger definition is defining property applicationGatewayIpConfigurations, ``` "applicationGatewayIpConfigurations": { "type": "array", "items": { "$ref": "./applicationGateway.json#/definitions/ApplicationGatewayIPConfiguration" }, "description": "Application gateway IP configurations of virtual network resource." } ``` but actual rest api returned applicationGatewayIPConfigurations, the P is upper case while in swagger it is lower case. ``` { "name": "subnet-agw", "id": "/subscriptions/<sub-id>/resourceGroups/<rg-name>/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/<vnet-name>/subnets/subnet-agw", "properties": { "applicationGatewayIPConfigurations": [ { "id": "/subscriptions/<sub-id>/resourceGroups/<rg-name>/providers/Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/<agw-name>/gatewayIPConfigurations/appGatewayIpConfig" } ] }, "type": "Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/subnets" } ``` * Making priority property required [This is the API invoked](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/virtualnetwork/network-security-groups/create-or-update?tabs=HTTP#code-try-0). For the NSG security rules without priorities, seems like the priority parameter is required. Azure portal works as expected. I don't think that's allowed but according to the schema it is because the priority property is not marked as required. I tried to create a NSG security rule without the priorities and it failed with below. Request Body: ``` { "properties": { "securityRules": [ { "name": "rule1", "properties": { "protocol": "*", "sourceAddressPrefix": "*", "destinationAddressPrefix": "*", "access": "Allow", "destinationPortRange": "80", "sourcePortRange": "*", "direction": "Inbound" } } ] }, "location": "eastus" } ``` Response received: ``` { "error": { "code": "SecurityRuleInvalidPriority", "message": "Security rule has invalid Priority. Value provided: 0 Allowed range 100-4096.", "details": [] } } ``` This PR will make the priority parameter as required. * Update NetworkSecurityGroupDelete.json * Update NetworkSecurityGroupRuleDelete.json * Update NetworkSecurityGroupDelete.json * Undo previous change of making fields optional within Exclusion (Azure#23325) * Nivishenker/http headers to insert (Azure#23295) * new app rule property - http header to insert * prettier * add to 22-11-01 * removed changes from 22-09-01 * fixed example * delete RCG example * fix delete examples * added a Location header * prettier fix * Application Gateway WAF Log scrubbing swagger changes (Azure#23022) * Log scrubbing API changes * Update examples * Addressing comments * Fix * Update property in load balancer for Connection Draining Phase 1 (Azure#23082) * Update property in load balancer for Coneection Draining Phase 1 * Fix model validation * Azure Firewall Packet Capture API. Cancelled PR from 2022-09-01 and created for 2022-11-01 (Azure#23114) * moving packet-capture api to 2022-11-01 release from 2022-09-01 * fixing the LRO response header error for model validation * Changes for Additional nic and corrections (Azure#23522) * Changes for Additional nic and corrections * Fixes for tool reported issues * Fix for SpellCheck, ModelValidation * Defining Location in NetworkVirtualApplianceDelete for async * Minor fix * Minor fix * Minor fix * PrettierCheck fixed * Fixing VirtualApplianceAdditionalNicProperties * ModelValidation fixed * Correcting the location header string * Correcting location header * Prettied Check Fix * Fix * Fix * Add inspection limit changes (Azure#23536) * Fixed headers for examples (Azure#23554) * Fix response of API: List of advertised/learned BGP routes (Azure#23555) * fix response type * fix format * fix example, add x-ms-identifiers * AuxiliarySku on Nic (Azure#23552) * Adding auxiliary sku property on nic * Adding AcceleratedConnections to AuxMode * modifying the auxSku values * Removing accidental change --------- Co-authored-by: Prachi Pravin Bhavsar <[email protected]> * migrated latest pr from incorrect branch (Azure#23589) * Changes for NVA connection (Azure#23173) * Changes for NVA connection * Changes to address validation failures * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Fix some ModelValidation errors * Addressing some review comments * Addressing some review comments * Addressing some review comments * Addressing some review comments * Addressing some review comments * Fix camel case for property name * Fixing resourceUri to Camel case in example files * Fix SDK duplication error * Fix one LintDiff error * try fix lintdiff errors * fix lro erro in lintdiff * fix model validation error * Bastion S360 for 2022-11 version (Azure#23595) * Release microsoft.network 2022 11 01 (Azure#23564) * Application Gateway WAF Rate Limit feature swagger changes * Fixing lint errors * Updated rate limit feature examples * rateLimitDuration and rateLimitThreshold are not mandatory. There are only mandatory if ruleType is RateLimitRule. This validation will be done in NRP. * Fix attempt 2. Removed minimum constraint from rateLimitThreshold. Validation will be done in NRP * Remove the minimum number for the option field requestBodyInspectLimitInKB (Azure#23663) * Remove minimum value for optional field requestBodyInspectLimitInKB * Remove exlcusiveMinimum --------- Co-authored-by: htippanaboya <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: tracyMicro <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: tejasshah7 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: sraghavan-msft <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: navba-MSFT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: NiviShenker <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sindhu Aluguvelli <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: phrazfipho <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: nikhilpadhye1 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: JainRah <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: karanbazaz <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: yeliMSFT <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: pracsb <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Prachi Pravin Bhavsar <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: nanditaashok-ms <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: anvrao1 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: baoqihuang0326 <[email protected]>
All SDK Contribution checklist:
This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.
Draftmode if it is:General Guidelines and Best Practices
Testing Guidelines
SDK Generation Guidelines
*.csprojandAssemblyInfo.csfiles have been updated with the new version of the SDK. Please double check nuget.org current release version.Additional management plane SDK specific contribution checklist:
Note: Only applies to
Microsoft.Azure.Management.[RP]orAzure.ResourceManager.[RP]Management plane SDK Troubleshooting
If this is very first SDK for a services and you are adding new service folders directly under /SDK, please add
new servicelabel and/or contact assigned reviewer.If the check fails at the
Verify Code Generationstep, please ensure:generate.ps1/cmdto generate this PR instead of callingautorestdirectly.Please pay attention to the @microsoft.csharp version output after running
generate.ps1. If it is lower than current released version (2.3.82), please run it again as it should pull down the latest version.Note: We have recently updated the PSH module called by
generate.ps1to emit additional data. This would help reduce/eliminate the Code Verification check error. Please run following command:Old outstanding PR cleanup
Please note:
If PRs (including draft) has been out for more than 60 days and there are no responses from our query or followups, they will be closed to maintain a concise list for our reviewers.