Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Edit property names for SourceControlSyncJob #3009

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 4, 2018

Conversation

MiaRomero
Copy link
Contributor

@MiaRomero MiaRomero commented May 4, 2018

Changing the "sourceControlSyncJobId" property to "syncJobId", and the "startedBy" property to "startType". Replacing the "errors" property with "exception" in the SourceControlSyncJobByIdProperties. Updating examples to reflect changes as well.

PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which have an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • Except for special cases involving multiple contributors, the PR is started from a fork of the main repository, not a branch.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes.
  • Swagger files are correctly named (e.g. the api-version in the path should match the api-version in the spec).

Quality of Swagger

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 4, 2018

Automation for azure-libraries-for-java

Nothing to generate for azure-libraries-for-java

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 4, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-python

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-python#1959

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 4, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-node

The initial PR has been merged into your service PR:
Azure/azure-sdk-for-node#2653

@AutorestCI
Copy link

AutorestCI commented May 4, 2018

Automation for azure-sdk-for-go

Encountered a Subprocess error: (azure-sdk-for-go)

Command: ['/usr/local/bin/autorest', '/tmp/tmputi4huny/rest/specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md', '--go', '--go-sdk-folder=/tmp/tmputi4huny/src/github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-go', '--multiapi', '[email protected]/autorest.go@~2.1.98', '--use-onever', '--verbose']
Finished with return code 1
and output:

AutoRest code generation utility [version: 2.0.4262; node: v7.10.1]
(C) 2018 Microsoft Corporation.
https://aka.ms/autorest
   Loading AutoRest core      '/root/.autorest/@[email protected]/node_modules/@microsoft.azure/autorest-core/dist' (2.0.4272)
   Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.go' (~2.1.98->2.1.98)
   Loading AutoRest extension '@microsoft.azure/autorest.modeler' (2.3.38->2.3.38)
Processing batch task - {"tag":"package-2015-10"} .
Processing batch task - {"tag":"package-2017-05-preview"} .
Processing batch task - {"tag":"package-2018-01-preview"} .
FATAL: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: Index was out of range. Must be non-negative and less than the size of the collection.
Parameter name: startIndex
   at System.String.LastIndexOf(Char value, Int32 startIndex, Int32 count)
   at AutoRest.Go.Model.CodeModelGo.PackageVerDir() in /opt/vsts/work/1/s/src/Model/CodeModelGo.cs:line 64
   at AutoRest.Go.Model.CodeModelGo.get_DefaultUserAgent() in /opt/vsts/work/1/s/src/Model/CodeModelGo.cs:line 83
   at AutoRest.Go.Model.CodeModelGo.get_UserAgent() in /opt/vsts/work/1/s/src/Model/CodeModelGo.cs:line 31
   at AutoRest.Go.Templates.VersionTemplate.<ExecuteAsync>d__1.MoveNext() in /opt/vsts/work/1/s/src/obj/Razor/Templates/VersionTemplate.cshtml:line 28
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw()
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at AutoRest.Core.CodeGenerator.<Write>d__12.MoveNext()
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw()
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at AutoRest.Go.CodeGeneratorGo.<Generate>d__6.MoveNext() in /opt/vsts/work/1/s/src/CodeGeneratorGo.cs:line 91
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw()
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at AutoRest.Go.Program.<ProcessInternal>d__3.MoveNext() in /opt/vsts/work/1/s/src/Program.cs:line 107
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown ---
   at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw()
   at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task)
   at NewPlugin.<Process>d__15.MoveNext()
FATAL: go/generate - FAILED
FATAL: Error: Plugin go reported failure.
Process() cancelled due to exception : Plugin go reported failure.
Failure during batch task - {"tag":"package-2018-01-preview"} -- Error: Plugin go reported failure..
  Error: Plugin go reported failure.

@azuresdkciprbot
Copy link

AutoRest linter results for ARM Related Validation Errors/Warnings

These errors are reported by the ARM team's validation tools, reachout to ARM RP API Review directly for any questions or concerns.

File: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md

⚠️0 new Warnings.(88 total)
0 new Errors.(0 total)

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues | Send feedback

Thanks for your co-operation.

@azuresdkciprbot
Copy link

AutoRest linter results for SDK Related Validation Errors/Warnings

These errors are reported by the SDK team's validation tools, reachout to ADX Swagger Reviewers directly for any questions or concerns.

File: specification/automation/resource-manager/readme.md

⚠️0 new Warnings.(131 total)
0 new Errors.(0 total)

AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues | Send feedback

Thanks for your co-operation.

@annatisch
Copy link
Member

Hi @MiaRomero - there are a couple of linter errors for this spec:

Error: "BodyTopLevelProperties"
message: "Top level properties should be one of name, type, id, location, properties, tags, plan, sku, etag, managedBy, identity, zones. Model definition 'DscNode' has extra properties ['lastSeen,registrationTime,ip,accountId,nodeConfiguration,status,nodeId,extensionHandler'].",

Error: "BodyTopLevelProperties"
message: "Top level properties should be one of name, type, id, location, properties, tags, plan, sku, etag, managedBy, identity, zones. Model definition 'DscNodeConfiguration' has extra properties ['lastModifiedTime,creationTime,configuration']."

@annatisch
Copy link
Member

@MiaRomero - The linter errors appear to be unrelated to the changes in your PR, so they wont block the merge. However if you are able to take a look that would be great :)

@MiaRomero
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @annatisch, thanks for the heads up. I don't work on the Dsc service so I would not be able to correct any linter errors in that area :(

@annatisch annatisch merged commit 97e14c4 into Azure:master May 4, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants