-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Renamed cost allocation tags to cost tags and added schema for get list of all available tag keys #2862
Conversation
Added Tags filter for budgets and updated the api version
Updated comments
Incorporated review comments
Incorporated review comments
Incorporated review comment
Added Tags filter and grouping for UsageDetails
Added reservation recommendations and tags
Incorporated review comments
Incorporated review comments
Removed unwanted space
Removed extra whitespace
Added schema spec for cost allocation tags
Updated Get Operation
Incorporated review comments
Review comments incorporated
Updated path
…st of all available tag keys Renamed cost allocation tags to cost tags and added schema for get list of all available tag keys
Automation for azure-libraries-for-javaNothing to generate for azure-libraries-for-java |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-pythonThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-nodeThe initial PR has been merged into your service PR: |
Automation for azure-sdk-for-goA PR has been created for you based on this PR content. Once this PR will be merged, content will be added to your service PR: |
@jianghaolu Please take a look. Thanks! |
@@ -1868,6 +1907,43 @@ | |||
} | |||
} | |||
}, | |||
"Tags": { | |||
"description": "A tag resource.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please put in more detailed descriptions. This is easily confused with "Tag".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You might even consider renaming this to "TagResource".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have updated the description. Please take a look if the changes are fine.
"type": "Microsoft.Consumption/tags", | ||
"eTag": "\"1d34d012214157f\"", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"tags": [ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The property name here should be "costTags", as defined in TagProperties
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! for mentioning this. Actually it was wrong at the other place. I am corrected it there.
Incorporated review comments
Incorporated review comments
"description": "The properties of the tag.", | ||
"properties": { | ||
"tags": { | ||
"description": "Tags.", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One more thing : Please avoid using property name as the description. Try to add a little more info :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure! I have made the changes. Will keep this in mind for future as well.
Incorporated review comments
Hi There, I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result: 💡 Please review potentially introduced Error(s)/Warning(s): Analysis Report 💡 File: AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues | Send feedback Thanks for your co-operation. |
Hi There, I am the AutoRest Linter Azure bot. I am here to help. My task is to analyze the situation from the AutoRest linter perspective. Please review the below analysis result: 💡 Please review potentially introduced Error(s)/Warning(s): Analysis Report 💡 File: AutoRest Linter Guidelines | AutoRest Linter Issues | Send feedback Thanks for your co-operation. |
Per offline discussion - this is a breaking change but 4/13/18 is when the service is first deployed. So this is accepted for now and no future breaking changes will be allowed to this spec. |
@AutorestCI regenerate azure-sdk-for-go |
This checklist is used to make sure that common issues in a pull request are addressed. This will expedite the process of getting your pull request merged and avoid extra work on your part to fix issues discovered during the review process.
PR information
api-version
in the path should match theapi-version
in the spec).Quality of Swagger