Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding a new endpoint type for connection monitor and location and subscription details in 2023-06-01-preview #25590

Conversation

v-sapanchal
Copy link
Contributor

@v-sapanchal v-sapanchal commented Aug 30, 2023

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

diagram

[1] ARM review queue (for merge queues, see [4])
The PRs are processed by time opened, ascending. Your PR may show up on 2nd or later page.
If you addressed Step 1 from the diagram and your PR is not showing up in the queue, ensure the label ARMChangesRequested
is removed from your PR. This should cause the label WaitForARMFeedback to be added.
[2] https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel
[3] List of SDK breaking changes approvers in pinned Teams announcement
[4] public repo merge queue, private repo merge queue (for ARM review queue, [1])

If you need further help with anything, see Getting help section below.

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check all that apply. This is mandatory!

  • New API version. (Such PR should have been generated with OpenAPI Hub, per this wiki doc.)
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix swagger quality issues in S360.
  • Other, please clarify:
    • edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

Breaking changes review (Step 1)

  • If the automation determines you have breaking changes, i.e. Step 1 from the diagram applies to you,
    you must follow the breaking changes process.
    IMPORTANT This applies even if:
    • The tool fails while it shouldn't, e.g. due to runtime exception, or incorrect detection of breaking changes.
    • You believe there is no need for you to request breaking change approval, for any reason.
      Such claims must be reviewed, and the process is the same.

ARM API changes review (Step 2)

  • If this PR is in purview of ARM review then automation will add the ARMReview label.
  • If you want to force ARM review, add the label yourself.
  • Proceed according to the diagram at the top of this comment.

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
Swagger-Suppression-Process
to get approval.

Getting help

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 30, 2023

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ Your PR is in purview of ARM review (label: ARMReview). Please ensure your PR is on the ARM PR review queue - see instructions in steps 1 and 2 in the PR description diagram.
  • ❌ The required check named Swagger ModelValidation has failed. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it.

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 30, 2023

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️⚠️Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 74 Warnings warning [Detail]
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
applicationGateway.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
applicationGatewayWafDynamicManifests.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
applicationSecurityGroup.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
availableDelegations.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
availableServiceAliases.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
azureFirewall.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
azureFirewallFqdnTag.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
azureWebCategory.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
bastionHost.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
checkDnsAvailability.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
cloudServiceNetworkInterface.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
cloudServicePublicIpAddress.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
cloudServiceSwap.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
customIpPrefix.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
ddosCustomPolicy.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
ddosProtectionPlan.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
dscpConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
endpointService.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
expressRouteCircuit.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
expressRouteCrossConnection.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
expressRoutePort.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
expressRouteProviderPort.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
firewallPolicy.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
ipAllocation.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
ipGroups.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
loadBalancer.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
natGateway.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
network.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
network.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-06-01-preview(main)
networkInterface.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManager.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManager.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
networkManagerConnection.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManagerConnection.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
networkManagerConnectivityConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManagerConnectivityConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
networkManagerEffectiveConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManagerEffectiveConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
networkManagerGroup.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManagerGroup.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
networkManagerScopeConnection.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManagerScopeConnection.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
networkManagerSecurityAdminConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkManagerSecurityAdminConfiguration.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2022-04-01-preview(main)
networkProfile.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkSecurityGroup.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkVirtualAppliance.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
networkWatcher.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
operation.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
privateEndpoint.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
privateLinkService.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
publicIpAddress.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
publicIpPrefix.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
routeFilter.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
routeTable.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
securityPartnerProvider.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
serviceCommunity.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
serviceEndpointPolicy.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
serviceTags.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
usage.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
virtualNetwork.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
virtualNetworkGateway.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
virtualNetworkTap.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
virtualRouter.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
virtualWan.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
vmssNetworkInterface.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
vmssPublicIpAddress.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)
webapplicationfirewall.json 2023-06-01-preview(5ab1439) 2023-05-01(main)

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:

Only 12 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule Message
⚠️ 1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkManagers/{networkManagerName}/listEffectiveVirtualNetworks' removed or restructured?
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManager.json#L418:5
⚠️ 1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkManagers/{networkManagerName}/listActiveSecurityUserRules' removed or restructured?
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L143:5
⚠️ 1005 - RemovedPath The new version is missing a path that was found in the old version. Was path '/subscriptions/{subscriptionId}/resourceGroups/{resourceGroupName}/providers/Microsoft.Network/networkManagers/{networkManagerName}/networkGroups/{networkGroupName}/listEffectiveVirtualNetworks' removed or restructured?
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManagerGroup.json#L240:5
⚠️ 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'EffectiveVirtualNetworksParameter' removed or renamed?
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManager.json#L422:3
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManager.json#L476:3
⚠️ 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'ActiveSecurityUserRule' removed or renamed?
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L150:3
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L197:3
⚠️ 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'ActiveDefaultSecurityUserRule' removed or renamed?
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L150:3
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L197:3
⚠️ 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'DefaultUserRulePropertiesFormat' removed or renamed?
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L150:3
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L197:3
⚠️ 1006 - RemovedDefinition The new version is missing a definition that was found in the old version. Was 'UserRulePropertiesFormat' removed or renamed?
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L150:3
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManagerActiveConfiguration.json#L197:3
⚠️ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue The new version is removing enum value(s) 'SecurityUser' from the old version.
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManager.json#L504:11
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManager.json#L558:11
⚠️ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue The new version is removing enum value(s) 'SecurityUser' from the old version.
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManager.json#L576:9
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManager.json#L625:9
⚠️ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue The new version is removing enum value(s) 'SecurityUser' from the old version.
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManager.json#L613:11
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManager.json#L661:11
⚠️ 1019 - RemovedEnumValue The new version is removing enum value(s) 'SecurityUser' from the old version.
New: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkManager.json#L676:9
Old: Microsoft.Network/preview/2022-04-01-preview/networkManager.json#L724:9
️❌CredScan: 0 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
️️✔️LintDiff succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for LintDiff.
compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.4) new version base version
default default(5ab1439) default(main)
️❌Avocado: 760 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

Only 12 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule Message
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/applicationGateway.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/applicationGatewayWafDynamicManifests.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/applicationSecurityGroup.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/availableDelegations.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/availableServiceAliases.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewallFqdnTag.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureWebCategory.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/bastionHost.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/checkDnsAvailability.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/cloudServiceNetworkInterface.json
UNREFERENCED_JSON_FILE The swagger JSON file is not referenced from the readme file.
readme: specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
json: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/cloudServicePublicIpAddress.json
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️❌ModelValidation: 442 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]

Only 12 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule Message
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L788:47
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGet.json#L45:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L908:39
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGet.json#L75:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L1043:43
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGet.json#L124:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L788:47
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithZones.json#L49:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L908:39
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithZones.json#L79:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L1043:43
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithZones.json#L128:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L788:47
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithMgmtSubnet.json#L59:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L908:39
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithMgmtSubnet.json#L89:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L1043:43
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithMgmtSubnet.json#L138:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L788:47
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithAdditionalProperties.json#L45:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L908:39
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithAdditionalProperties.json#L75:13
MISSING_RESOURCE_ID id is required to return in response of GET/PUT resource calls but not being provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/azureFirewall.json#L1043:43
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/AzureFirewallGetWithAdditionalProperties.json#L124:13
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 30, 2023

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️❌ApiDocPreview: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule Message
RestBuild error "logUrl":"https://apidrop.visualstudio.com/Content%20CI/_build/results?buildId=383935&view=logs&j=fd490c07-0b22-5182-fac9-6d67fe1e939b",
"detail":"Run.ps1 failed with exit code 1 "
️️✔️SDK Breaking Change Tracking succeeded [Detail] [Expand]

Breaking Changes Tracking




️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from d582fb474f135d269768efe17aacfd68ea1fa23e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️Azure.ResourceManager.Network [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
    info	[Changelog] Breaking Changes: /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.Network.FirewallPolicyRuleCollectionGroupData Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ArmNetworkModelFactory.FirewallPolicyRuleCollectionGroupData(Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, System.Nullable<Azure.Core.ResourceType>, System.Nullable<Azure.ETag>, System.Nullable<System.Int32>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.FirewallPolicyRuleCollectionInfo>, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.NetworkProvisioningState>)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
    info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.Network.SubnetData Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ArmNetworkModelFactory.SubnetData(Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, System.Nullable<Azure.Core.ResourceType>, System.Nullable<Azure.ETag>, System.String, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<System.String>, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.NetworkSecurityGroupData, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.RouteTableData, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ServiceEndpointProperties>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.ServiceEndpointPolicyData>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.PrivateEndpointData>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.NetworkIPConfiguration>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.NetworkIPConfigurationProfile>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Resources.Models.WritableSubResource>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ResourceNavigationLink>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ServiceAssociationLink>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ServiceDelegation>, System.String, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.NetworkProvisioningState>, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualNetworkPrivateEndpointNetworkPolicy>, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualNetworkPrivateLinkServiceNetworkPolicy>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ApplicationGatewayIPConfiguration>)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
    info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.Network.VirtualNetworkGatewayData Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ArmNetworkModelFactory.VirtualNetworkGatewayData(Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.String, System.Nullable<Azure.Core.ResourceType>, System.Nullable<Azure.Core.AzureLocation>, System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary<System.String, System.String>, Azure.ResourceManager.Resources.Models.ExtendedLocation, System.Nullable<Azure.ETag>, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualNetworkGatewayIPConfiguration>, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualNetworkGatewayType>, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VpnType>, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VpnGatewayGeneration>, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualNetworkGatewaySku, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VpnClientConfiguration, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualNetworkGatewayPolicyGroup>, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.BgpSettings, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<System.String>, System.Nullable<System.Guid>, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.NetworkProvisioningState>, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, System.String, Azure.Core.ResourceIdentifier, System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.VirtualNetworkGatewayNatRuleData>, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, System.Nullable<System.Boolean>, System.Nullable<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ExpressRouteGatewayAdminState>)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
    info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(96,5): error : ApiCompat failed for '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/bin/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/Debug/netstandard2.0/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.dll' [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0]
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
  • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from d582fb474f135d269768efe17aacfd68ea1fa23e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
    command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]  notice
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 9.6.7 -> 10.0.0
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.0.0>
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
    cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
  • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-network [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog]   - Model BastionHost has a new parameter network_acls
    info	[Changelog]   - Model BastionHost has a new parameter virtual_network
    info	[Changelog]   - Model FirewallPolicy has a new parameter size
    info	[Changelog]   - Model FirewallPolicyRuleCollectionGroup has a new parameter size
    info	[Changelog]   - Model Subnet has a new parameter default_outbound_access
    info	[Changelog]   - Model VirtualNetworkGateway has a new parameter auto_scale_configuration
️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
  • ⚠️Warning [Logs] Generate from d582fb474f135d269768efe17aacfd68ea1fa23e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip is available: 23.0.1 -> 23.2.1
    cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
    cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip is available: 23.0.1 -> 23.2.1
    cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
    command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️azure-resourcemanager-network-generated [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from d582fb474f135d269768efe17aacfd68ea1fa23e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `BastionHostPropertiesFormatNetworkACLs`
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `IPRule`
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `VirtualNetworkGatewayAutoScaleBounds`
    info	[Changelog] - New struct `VirtualNetworkGatewayAutoScaleConfiguration`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `NetworkACLs`, `VirtualNetwork` in struct `BastionHostPropertiesFormat`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `Size` in struct `FirewallPolicyPropertiesFormat`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `Size` in struct `FirewallPolicyRuleCollectionGroupProperties`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `DefaultOutboundAccess` in struct `SubnetPropertiesFormat`
    info	[Changelog] - New field `AutoScaleConfiguration` in struct `VirtualNetworkGatewayPropertiesFormat`
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 13 additive change(s).
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
  • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs] Generate from d582fb474f135d269768efe17aacfd68ea1fa23e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
    warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
    command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️@azure/arm-network [View full logs]  [Preview SDK Changes]
    info	[Changelog] **Features**
    info	[Changelog]
    info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface BastionHostPropertiesFormatNetworkAcls
    info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface IPRule
    info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface VirtualNetworkGatewayAutoScaleBounds
    info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface VirtualNetworkGatewayAutoScaleConfiguration
    info	[Changelog]   - Interface BastionHost has a new optional parameter networkAcls
    info	[Changelog]   - Interface BastionHost has a new optional parameter virtualNetwork
    info	[Changelog]   - Interface FirewallPolicy has a new optional parameter size
    info	[Changelog]   - Interface FirewallPolicyRuleCollectionGroup has a new optional parameter size
    info	[Changelog]   - Interface Subnet has a new optional parameter defaultOutboundAccess
    info	[Changelog]   - Interface VirtualNetworkGateway has a new optional parameter autoScaleConfiguration
️❌ azure-resource-manager-schemas failed [Detail]
  • Code Generator Failed [Logs] Generate from d582fb474f135d269768efe17aacfd68ea1fa23e. Schema Automation 14.0.0
    command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[initScript.sh]  ERR! code EBADENGINE
    cmderr	[initScript.sh]  Unsupported engine
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm ERR! engine Not compatible with your version of node/npm: [email protected]
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm ERR! notsup Not compatible with your version of node/npm: [email protected]
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm ERR! notsup Required: {"node":"^18.17.0 || >=20.5.0"}
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm ERR! notsup Actual:   {"npm":"8.19.4","node":"v16.20.2"}
    cmderr	[initScript.sh]  A complete log of this run can be found in:
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm ERR!     /home/cloudtest/.npm/_logs/2023-09-05T10_00_04_284Z-debug-0.log
    error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-resource-manager-schemas]: .sdkauto/initScript.sh
    warn	File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
    command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] /mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:500
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     return new TSError(diagnosticText, diagnosticCodes)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]            ^
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] TSError: ⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(7,20): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'colors' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(11,19): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'yargs' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(12,18): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'path' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(14,35): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'fs' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(15,23): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'strip-ansi' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(53,9): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the `lib` compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(64,9): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the `lib` compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(81,67): error TS7006: Parameter 'x' implicitly has an 'any' type.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(82,49): error TS7006: Parameter 'f' implicitly has an 'any' type.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(106,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the `lib` compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(117,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the `lib` compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(118,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the `lib` compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(169,13): error TS2591: Cannot find name 'process'. Do you need to install type definitions for node? Try `npm i @types/node` and then add `node` to the types field in your tsconfig.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at createTSError (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:500:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at reportTSError (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:504:19)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at getOutput (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:739:36)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Object.compile (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:955:32)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module.m._compile (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:1043:43)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1252:10)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Object.require.extensions.<computed> [as .ts] (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:1046:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1076:32)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:911:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:81:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.4 -> 10.0.0
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.0.0>
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] npm notice
    error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-resource-manager-schemas]: .sdkauto/generateScript.sh
    warn	Skip package processing as generation is failed
️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
  • Pipeline Framework Failed [Logs] Generate from d582fb474f135d269768efe17aacfd68ea1fa23e. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
    Error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
  • ⚠️Az.network.DefaultTag [View full logs
    error	Fatal error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
    error	The following packages are still pending:
    error		Az.network.DefaultTag
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Aug 30, 2023

Generated ApiView

Language Package Name ApiView Link
Go sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/6bbda0d1a0dd4acebb1eef798acf1afe
Java azure-resourcemanager-network-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/80b05168a2674395969709b7432705cb
JavaScript @azure/arm-network https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/d254f2212ee6477ebb28ff2f7636dab5
.Net Azure.ResourceManager.Network https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/bb88a82969274937ad479c41f18fb9cf

@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

Swagger Validation Report

️🔄BreakingChange inProgress [Detail]
️⌛Breaking Change(Cross-Version) pending [Detail]
️⌛CredScan pending [Detail]
️🔄LintDiff inProgress [Detail]
️🔄Avocado inProgress [Detail]
️🔄SwaggerAPIView inProgress [Detail]
️🔄TypeSpecAPIView inProgress [Detail]
️❌ModelValidation: 12 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule Message
LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/applicationSecurityGroup.json#L66:22
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/ApplicationSecurityGroupDelete.json
LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
Url: Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/applicationSecurityGroup.json#L66:22
ExampleUrl: preview/2023-06-01-preview/examples/ApplicationSecurityGroupDelete.json
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/loadBalancer.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkInterface.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkSecurityGroup.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkWatcher.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/virtualNetworkTap.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/loadBalancer.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkInterface.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkSecurityGroup.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/networkWatcher.json"
unacceptable kind of an object to dump [object Error] "role":"Model Validation",
"url":"https://github.com/Azure/azure-rest-api-specs/blob/22aded676e8a05553a602fbb5bb655c8189c72b5/specification/network/resource-manager/Microsoft.Network/preview/2023-06-01-preview/virtualNetworkTap.json"
️🔄SemanticValidation inProgress [Detail]
️⌛PoliCheck pending [Detail]
️⌛PrettierCheck pending [Detail]
️🔄SpellCheck inProgress [Detail]
️🔄Lint(RPaaS) inProgress [Detail]
️⌛PR Summary pending [Detail]
️⌛Automated merging requirements met pending [Detail]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMReview CI-MissingBaseCommit new-api-version resource-manager WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Sep 5, 2023
@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi @v-sapanchal! For review efficiency consideration, when creating a new API version, it is required to place API specs of the base version in the first commit, and push new version updates into successive commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version.
For more details refer to the wiki.

Copy link
Contributor

@kumaam kumaam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed networkwatcher.json file, lgtm

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer.
When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove the ARMChangesRequested label.
This will notify the reviewer to have another look.
If the feedback provided needs further discussion, please use this Teams channel to post your questions - aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
Please include [ARM Query] in the title of your question to indicate that it is ARM-related.

@openapi-workflow-bot openapi-workflow-bot bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Sep 13, 2023
@v-sapanchal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @mentat9 , Could you please help me, how can I resolve this comment.
Thank you for your help.

@mentat9
Copy link
Member

mentat9 commented Sep 19, 2023

Hi @mentat9 , Could you please help me, how can I resolve this comment. Thank you for your help.

@v-sapanchal - I (and the automation) can't find any evidence for the current existence of the 2023-06-01-preview API version, so this PR appears to be for a new API version, so:

  1. Fix the "Purpose of this PR" section in the first comment.
  2. Follow the instructions linked in the "New API version" option in the first comment (you will need to put your changes into a new PR).
  3. Carefully read and follow the process documented in the first comment to get your PR through review, approval, and merge.

@v-sapanchal
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @mentat9 , Could you please help me, how can I resolve this comment. Thank you for your help.

@v-sapanchal - I (and the automation) can't find any evidence for the current existence of the 2023-06-01-preview API version, so this PR appears to be for a new API version, so:

  1. Fix the "Purpose of this PR" section in the first comment.
  2. Follow the instructions linked in the "New API version" option in the first comment (you will need to put your changes into a new PR).
  3. Carefully read and follow the process documented in the first comment to get your PR through review, approval, and merge.

Hi @mentat9 ,
Thank you for your quick response,

I have already raised separated PR, this is the separated one ,
Could you please help me to understand, which branch I can use for target branch for this change.
This is new change in model/properties, that will create a updated SDK(.net). Need to use that SDK to get my other PR to complete. But I am struggling to understand, how I can resolve this issue.
Initially, I had merged my changes in stable version. then I got NewAPiVersionRequired error (step 1) , found a referenced PR in the comments, This is the PR(#25343), which I have followed to resolve this issue. By followed this PR, got succeeded to resolve Step 1 but now I am on Step 2.
I need to resolve this PR asap, in order to complete other main PR.
Please help me to resolve this.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

1 similar comment
@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

4 similar comments
@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

9 similar comments
@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

@microsoft-github-policy-service
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. Your PR has no update for 14 days and it is marked as stale PR. If no further update for over 14 days, the bot will close the PR. If you want to refresh the PR, please remove no-recent-activity label.

Copy link
Contributor

Hi, @v-sapanchal. The PR will be closed since the PR has no update for 28 days. If you still need the PR review to proceed, please reopen it and @ mention PR assignee.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review ARMReview CI-MissingBaseCommit new-api-version resource-manager
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants