Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrected error being generated during .NET SDK Release #24478

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2023
Merged

Conversation

JainRah
Copy link
Contributor

@JainRah JainRah commented Jun 16, 2023

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki. Note that this doesn't apply if you are trying to merge a PR that was previously in the private repository.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@JainRah JainRah requested a review from MikhailTryakhov as a code owner June 16, 2023 03:32
@openapi-pipeline-app
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 16, 2023

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.4)] new version base version
networkVirtualAppliance.json 2023-02-01(656d830) 2023-02-01(main)
️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
compared tags (via openapi-validator v2.1.3) new version base version
package-2023-02 package-2023-02(656d830) package-2023-02(main)

The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule Message
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'networkVirtualApplianceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L37
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L85
ParametersInPointGet Query parameter $expand should be removed. Point Get's MUST not have query parameters other than api version.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L105
PatchIdentityProperty The patch operation body parameter schema should contain property 'identity'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L181
PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L248
PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 201 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'create'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L248
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L270
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'networkVirtualApplianceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L373
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'siteName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L373
LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L413
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L422
PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L535
PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 201 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'create'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L535
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L551
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'networkVirtualApplianceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L566
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'skuName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L658
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'networkVirtualApplianceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L701
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'ruleCollectionName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L701
PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 200 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'update'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L743
PutResponseSchemaDescription Description of 201 response code of a PUT operation MUST include term 'create'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L743
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L759
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L44
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L105
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L160
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L217
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L295
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L380
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L442
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L497
⚠️ ParameterNotUsingCommonTypes Not using the common-types defined parameter 'resourceGroupName'.
Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2023-02-01/networkVirtualAppliance.json#L573
️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Avocado.
️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️CadlAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for CadlValidation.
️️✔️TypeSpec Validation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for TypeSpec Validation.
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @JainRah Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 16, 2023

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️❌ApiDocPreview: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    RestBuild error "logUrl":"https://apidrop.visualstudio.com/Content%20CI/_build/results?buildId=368430&view=logs&j=fd490c07-0b22-5182-fac9-6d67fe1e939b",
    "detail":"Run.ps1 failed with exit code 1 "
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-js - @azure/arm-network - Approved - 32.0.0
    +	Class NetworkManagementClient has a new signature
    +	Enum KnownApplicationGatewayCustomErrorStatusCode no longer has value HttpStatus499

    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b4a0a3. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:712
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m 712 | �[0m         �[36;1mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[36;1m     | �[31;1m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[31;1m�[36;1m     | �[31;1mFailed to build sdk. exit code: False
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
    • Azure.ResourceManager.Network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] Breaking Changes: /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.ArmOperation<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.PeerRouteList> Azure.ResourceManager.Network.BgpConnectionResource.GetLearnedRoutesVirtualHubBgpConnection(Azure.WaitUntil, System.Threading.CancellationToken)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public System.Threading.Tasks.Task<Azure.ResourceManager.ArmOperation<Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.PeerRouteList>> Azure.ResourceManager.Network.BgpConnectionResource.GetLearnedRoutesVirtualHubBgpConnectionAsync(Azure.WaitUntil, System.Threading.CancellationToken)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.ArmOperation Azure.ResourceManager.Network.VirtualHubResource.GetEffectiveVirtualHubRoutes(Azure.WaitUntil, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.EffectiveRoutesContent, System.Threading.CancellationToken)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public System.Threading.Tasks.Task<Azure.ResourceManager.ArmOperation> Azure.ResourceManager.Network.VirtualHubResource.GetEffectiveVirtualHubRoutesAsync(Azure.WaitUntil, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.EffectiveRoutesContent, System.Threading.CancellationToken)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.ArmOperation Azure.ResourceManager.Network.VirtualHubResource.GetInboundRoutes(Azure.WaitUntil, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualHubInboundRoutesContent, System.Threading.CancellationToken)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public System.Threading.Tasks.Task<Azure.ResourceManager.ArmOperation> Azure.ResourceManager.Network.VirtualHubResource.GetInboundRoutesAsync(Azure.WaitUntil, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualHubInboundRoutesContent, System.Threading.CancellationToken)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.ArmOperation Azure.ResourceManager.Network.VirtualHubResource.GetOutboundRoutes(Azure.WaitUntil, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualHubOutboundRoutesContent, System.Threading.CancellationToken)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public System.Threading.Tasks.Task<Azure.ResourceManager.ArmOperation> Azure.ResourceManager.Network.VirtualHubResource.GetOutboundRoutesAsync(Azure.WaitUntil, Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.VirtualHubOutboundRoutesContent, System.Threading.CancellationToken)' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ApplicationGatewayCustomErrorStatusCode Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.ApplicationGatewayCustomErrorStatusCode.HttpStatus499.get()' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : MembersMustExist : Member 'public Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.LoadBalancerBackendAddressAdminState Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.LoadBalancerBackendAddressAdminState.Drain.get()' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(82,5): error : TypesMustExist : Type 'Azure.ResourceManager.Network.Models.PeerRouteList' does not exist in the implementation but it does exist in the contract. [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0],
      info	[Changelog] /home/cloudtest/.nuget/packages/microsoft.dotnet.apicompat/5.0.0-beta.20467.1/build/Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat.targets(96,5): error : ApiCompat failed for '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/bin/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/Debug/netstandard2.0/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.dll' [/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/network/Azure.ResourceManager.Network/src/Azure.ResourceManager.Network.csproj::TargetFramework=netstandard2.0]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b4a0a3. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 9.5.1 -> 9.7.1
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.7.1>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b4a0a3. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] ### Breaking Changes
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - `ApplicationGatewayCustomErrorStatusCodeHTTPStatus499` from enum `ApplicationGatewayCustomErrorStatusCode` has been removed
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New enum type `AdminState` with values `AdminStateDisabled`, `AdminStateEnabled`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ResourceGUID` in struct `AdminPropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ResourceGUID` in struct `AdminRuleCollectionPropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `DefaultPredefinedSSLPolicy` in struct `ApplicationGatewayPropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ResourceGUID` in struct `ConnectivityConfigurationProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ResourceGUID` in struct `DefaultAdminPropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ResourceGUID` in struct `GroupProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ResourceGUID` in struct `ManagerProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `ResourceGUID` in struct `SecurityAdminConfigurationPropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `AdminState` in struct `VirtualNetworkGatewayPropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 1 breaking change(s), 12 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b4a0a3. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Type Alias AdminState
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ActiveDefaultSecurityAdminRule has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ActiveSecurityAdminRule has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface AdminRule has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface AdminRuleCollection has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ApplicationGateway has a new optional parameter defaultPredefinedSslPolicy
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ConfigurationGroup has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface ConnectivityConfiguration has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface DefaultAdminRule has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface EffectiveConnectivityConfiguration has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface EffectiveDefaultSecurityAdminRule has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface EffectiveSecurityAdminRule has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkGroup has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkManager has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface SecurityAdminConfiguration has a new optional parameter resourceGuid
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface VirtualNetworkGateway has a new optional parameter adminState
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Enum KnownAdminState
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking Changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Class NetworkManagementClient has a new signature
      info	[Changelog]   - Enum KnownApplicationGatewayCustomErrorStatusCode no longer has value HttpStatus499
    ️🔄 azure-resource-manager-schemas inProgress [Detail]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Pipeline Framework Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from 0b4a0a3. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
      SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
      Error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
    • Az.network.DefaultTag [View full logs
      error	Fatal error: SSL error: syscall failure: Broken pipe
      error	The following packages are still pending:
      error		Az.network.DefaultTag
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jun 16, 2023

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/d8ea848f5ff54f79aae2316db74ff0c4
    Java azure-resourcemanager-network-generated https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/884c9058601442f5a90a4954c4eaeb76
    .Net Azure.ResourceManager.Network https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/db346aff13e8434e9ceb3e05a3f0f9c3
    JavaScript @azure/arm-network https://apiview.dev/Assemblies/Review/732aeba0d32047a1bc6d48ba334dfc89

    @zedy-wj
    Copy link
    Member

    zedy-wj commented Jun 19, 2023

    @qiaozha - Please help check the JS breaking change. Thanks!

    @zedy-wj zedy-wj added the Approved-OkToMerge <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee approve to merge the updates label Jun 19, 2023
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    5 participants