Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Network Watcher S360 Correctness Fix for 2022-05-01 #21341

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2022

Conversation

supriyajha-ms
Copy link
Contributor

@supriyajha-ms supriyajha-ms commented Oct 31, 2022

ARM API Information (Control Plane)

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Azure 1st Party Service can try out the Shift Left experience to initiate API design review from ADO code repo. If you are interested, may request engineering support by filling in with the form https://aka.ms/ShiftLeftSupportForm.

Changelog

Add a changelog entry for this PR by answering the following questions:

  1. What's the purpose of the update?
    • new service onboarding
    • new API version
    • update existing version for new feature
    • update existing version to fix swagger quality issue in s360
    • Other, please clarify
  2. When are you targeting to deploy the new service/feature to public regions? Please provide the date or, if the date is not yet available, the month.
  3. When do you expect to publish the swagger? Please provide date or, the the date is not yet available, the month.
  4. By default, Azure SDKs of all languages (.NET/Python/Java/JavaScript for both management-plane SDK and data-plane SDK, Go for management-plane SDK only ) MUST be refreshed with/after swagger of new version is published. If you prefer NOT to refresh any specific SDK language upon swagger updates in the current PR, please leave details with justification here.

Contribution checklist (MS Employees Only):

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

Applicability: ⚠️

If your changes encompass only the following scenarios, you should SKIP this section, as these scenarios do not require ARM review.

  • Change to data plane APIs
  • Adding new properties
  • All removals

Otherwise your PR may be subject to ARM review requirements. Complete the following:

  • Check this box if any of the following apply to the PR so that the label "ARMReview" and "WaitForARMFeedback" will be added by bot to kick off ARM API Review. Missing to check this box in the following scenario may result in delays to the ARM manifest review and deployment.

    • Adding a new service
    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
      -[ ] To review changes efficiently, ensure you copy the existing version into the new directory structure for first commit and then push new changes, including version updates, in separate commits. You can use OpenAPIHub to initialize the PR for adding a new version. For more details refer to the wiki.
  • Ensure you've reviewed following guidelines including ARM resource provider contract and REST guidelines. Estimated time (4 hours). This is required before you can request review from ARM API Review board.

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If you have any breaking changes as defined in the Breaking Change Policy, request approval from the Breaking Change Review Board.

Action: to initiate an evaluation of the breaking change, create a new intake using the template for breaking changes. Additional details on the process and office hours are on the Breaking Change Wiki.

NOTE: To update API(s) in public preview for over 1 year (refer to Retirement of Previews)

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-workflow-bot
Copy link

Hi, @supriyajha-ms Thanks for your PR. I am workflow bot for review process. Here are some small tips.

  • Please ensure to do self-check against checklists in first PR comment.
  • PR assignee is the person auto-assigned and responsible for your current PR reviewing and merging.
  • For specs comparison cross API versions, Use API Specs Comparison Report Generator
  • If there is CI failure(s), to fix CI error(s) is mandatory for PR merging; or you need to provide justification in PR comment for explanation. How to fix?

  • Any feedback about review process or workflow bot, pls contact swagger and tools team. [email protected]

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 31, 2022

    Swagger Validation Report

    ️❌BreakingChange: 4 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    compared swaggers (via Oad v0.10.1)] new version base version
    networkWatcher.json 2022-05-01(47a1c48) 2022-05-01(main)
    Rule Message
    1017 - ReferenceRedirection The '$ref' property points to different models in the old and new versions.
    New: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2347:9
    Old: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2347:9
    1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse The new version has a new property 'details' in response that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/network.json#L56:7
    Old: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/network.json#L39:7
    1041 - AddedPropertyInResponse The new version has a new property 'innerError' in response that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/network.json#L56:7
    Old: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/network.json#L39:7
    1045 - AddedOptionalProperty The new version has a new optional property 'runningOperationIds' that was not found in the old version.
    New: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2375:7
    Old: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2375:7
    ️️✔️Breaking Change(Cross-Version) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There are no breaking changes.
    ️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    There is no credential detected.
    ️⚠️LintDiff: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]
    compared tags (via openapi-validator v1.13.0) new version base version
    package-2022-05 package-2022-05(47a1c48) package-2022-05(main)

    The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

    Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

    Rule Message
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2344
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2344
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'ErrorResponse' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2344
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'NetworkWatcher' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2354
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'NetworkWatcherPropertiesFormat' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2374
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'NetworkWatcherListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2392
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'TopologyParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2404
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'Topology' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2421
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'TopologyResource' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2450
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'TopologyAssociation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2474
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'VerificationIPFlowParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2499
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'VerificationIPFlowResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2553
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'NextHopParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2566
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'NextHopResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2592
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'SecurityGroupViewParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2621
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'SecurityGroupViewResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2633
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'SecurityGroupNetworkInterface' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2645
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'SecurityRuleAssociations' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2658
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'NetworkInterfaceAssociation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2685
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'SubnetAssociation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2702
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PacketCapture' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2719
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PacketCaptureParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2732
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PacketCaptureStorageLocation' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2816
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PacketCaptureFilter' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2833
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PacketCaptureListResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2868
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PacketCaptureResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2880
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PacketCaptureResultProperties' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2905
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'PacketCaptureQueryStatusResult' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2920
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'TroubleshootingParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2975
    R4037 - MissingTypeObject The schema 'QueryTroubleshootingParameters' is considered an object but without a 'type:object', please add the missing 'type:object'.
    Location: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2993
    ️️✔️Avocado succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Avocado.
    ️️✔️ApiReadinessCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    ️⚠️~[Staging] ServiceAPIReadinessTest: 0 Warnings warning [Detail]

    API Test is not triggered due to precheck failure. Check pipeline log for details.

    ️❌ModelValidation: 14 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
    Rule Message
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L177:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L769:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherPacketCaptureDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L830:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherPacketCaptureStop.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L1704:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherConnectionMonitorDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L1829:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherConnectionMonitorStop.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L1890:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherConnectionMonitorStart.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2264:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherFlowLogDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L177:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L769:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherPacketCaptureDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L830:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherPacketCaptureStop.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L1704:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherConnectionMonitorDelete.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L1829:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherConnectionMonitorStop.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L1890:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherConnectionMonitorStart.json
    LRO_RESPONSE_HEADER Long running operation should return location or azure-AsyncOperation in header but not provided
    Url: Microsoft.Network/stable/2022-05-01/networkWatcher.json#L2264:22
    ExampleUrl: stable/2022-05-01/examples/NetworkWatcherFlowLogDelete.json
    ️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
    ️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passed for PoliCheck.
    ️️✔️PrettierCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for PrettierCheck.
    ️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for SpellCheck.
    ️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
    ️️✔️CadlValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for CadlValidation.
    ️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    Validation passes for Summary.
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 31, 2022

    Swagger Generation Artifacts

    ️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
     Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
    ️❌SDK Breaking Change Tracking failed [Detail]

    Breaking Changes Tracking

    azure-sdk-for-go - sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork - 3.0.0
    +	Type of `ErrorResponse.Error` has been changed from `*ErrorDetails` to `*Error`


    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from e501ae8. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      warn	Skip initScript due to not configured
      command	sudo apt-get install -y dotnet-sdk-6.0
      command	autorest --version=2.0.4421 --csharp --reflect-api-versions --license-header=MICROSOFT_MIT_NO_VERSION [email protected]/[email protected] --csharp-sdks-folder=/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/sdk ../azure-rest-api-specs/specification/network/resource-manager/readme.md
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
      cmderr	[Autorest] realpath(): Permission denied
    • ️✔️Microsoft.Azure.Management.Network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    ️❌ azure-sdk-for-net-track2 failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from e501ae8. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Automation-Sdk-Init.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	pwsh ./eng/scripts/Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1 ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-net_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:611
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m 611 | �[0m         �[96mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91m�[96m     | �[91mFailed to generate sdk. exit code: False
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91mGet-ChildItem: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:698
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m 698 | �[0m … rtifacts += �[96mGet-ChildItem $artifactsPath -Filter *.nupkg -exclude *.s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91m�[96m     | �[91mCannot find path
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m'/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/artifacts/packages/Debug/' because it does not exist.
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91mGeneratePackage: �[0m/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-sdk-for-net/eng/scripts/automation/GenerateAndBuildLib.ps1:611
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96mLine |
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m 611 | �[0m         �[96mGeneratePackage -projectFolder $projectFolder -sdkRootPath $s�[0m …
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[96m     | �[91m         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[91m�[96m     | �[91mFailed to generate sdk artifact
      cmderr	[Invoke-GenerateAndBuildV2.ps1] �[0m
    • Azure.ResourceManager.Network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog]
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-python-track2 warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from e501ae8. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_init.sh] WARNING: Skipping azure-nspkg as it is not installed.
      command	sh scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-python_tmp/generateOutput.json
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh]
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice New major version of npm available! 8.19.2 -> 9.1.1
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Changelog: <https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v9.1.1>
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice Run `npm install -g [email protected]` to update!
      cmderr	[automation_generate.sh] npm notice
    • ️✔️track2_azure-mgmt-network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Model NetworkWatcher has a new parameter running_operation_ids
    ️⚠️ azure-sdk-for-java warning [Detail]
    • ⚠️Warning [Logs]Release - Generate from e501ae8. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/initOutput.json
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip available: 22.3 -> 22.3.1
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] A new release of pip available: 22.3 -> 22.3.1
      cmderr	[init.sh] [notice] To update, run: pip install --upgrade pip
      command	./eng/mgmt/automation/generate.py ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-java_tmp/generateOutput.json
      warn	No file changes detected after generation
      warn	No package detected after generation
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from e501ae8. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
      info	[Changelog] ### Features Added
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `DelegationProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New struct `PartnerManagedResourceProperties`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `CustomBlockResponseBody` in struct `PolicySettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `CustomBlockResponseStatusCode` in struct `PolicySettings`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `DeploymentType` in struct `VirtualAppliancePropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `Delegation` in struct `VirtualAppliancePropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `PartnerManagedResource` in struct `VirtualAppliancePropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog] - New field `VirtualNetwork` in struct `BackendAddressPoolPropertiesFormat`
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] Total 0 breaking change(s), 7 additive change(s).
    ️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    • ️✔️Succeeded [Logs]Release - Generate from e501ae8. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh .scripts/automation_init.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json
      warn	File azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read
      command	sh .scripts/automation_generate.sh ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-sdk-for-js_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • ️✔️@azure/arm-network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] Breaking Change Detected
      info	[Changelog] **Features**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface DdosProtectionPlansDeleteHeaders
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface DelegationProperties
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface PartnerManagedResourceProperties
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface PublicIPAddressesDdosProtectionStatusHeaders
      info	[Changelog]   - Added Interface PublicIPAddressesDeleteHeaders
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface BackendAddressPool has a new optional parameter virtualNetwork
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface DdosProtectionPlan has a new optional parameter publicIPAddresses
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkVirtualAppliance has a new optional parameter delegation
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkVirtualAppliance has a new optional parameter deploymentType
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface NetworkVirtualAppliance has a new optional parameter partnerManagedResource
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface PolicySettings has a new optional parameter customBlockResponseBody
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface PolicySettings has a new optional parameter customBlockResponseStatusCode
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog] **Breaking Changes**
      info	[Changelog]
      info	[Changelog]   - Interface DdosProtectionPlan no longer has parameter publicIpAddresses
    ️🔄 azure-resource-manager-schemas inProgress [Detail]
    ️❌ azure-powershell failed [Detail]
    • Failed [Logs]Release - Generate from e501ae8. SDK Automation 14.0.0
      command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
      command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
    • Az.network [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes]
    Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

    @openapi-pipeline-app
    Copy link

    openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Oct 31, 2022

    Generated ApiView

    Language Package Name ApiView Link
    Go sdk/resourcemanager/network/armnetwork Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    JavaScript @azure/arm-network Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.
    Python track2_azure-mgmt-network Create ApiView failed. Please ensure your github account in Azure/Microsoft is public and add a comment "/azp run" to re-trigger the CI.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    NewApiVersionRequired reason:

    A service’s API is a contract with customers and is represented by using the api-version query parameter. Changes such as adding an optional property to a request/response or introducing a new operation is a change to the service’s contract and therefore requires a new api-version value. This is critically important for documentation, client libraries, and customer support.

    EXAMPLE: if a customer calls a service in the public cloud using api-version=2020-07-27, the new property or operation may exist but if they call the service in a government cloud, air-gapped cloud, or Azure Stack Hub cloud using the same api-version, the property or operation may not exist. Because there is no clear relationship between the service api-version and the new property/operation, customers can’t trust the documentation and Azure customer have difficulty helping customers diagnose issues. In addition, each client library version documents the service version it supports. When an optional property or new operation is added to a service and its Swagger, new client libraries must be produced to expose this functionality to customers. Without updating the api-version, it is unclear to customers which version of a client library supports these new features.

    @openapi-workflow-bot
    Copy link

    Hi @supriyajha-ms, Your PR has some issues. Please fix the CI sequentially by following the order of Avocado, semantic validation, model validation, breaking change, lintDiff. If you have any questions, please post your questions in this channel https://aka.ms/swaggersupport.

    TaskHow to fixPriority
    AvocadoFix-AvocadoHigh
    Semantic validationFix-SemanticValidation-ErrorHigh
    Model validationFix-ModelValidation-ErrorHigh
    LintDiffFix-LintDiffhigh
    If you need further help, please feedback via swagger feedback.

    @JeffreyRichter JeffreyRichter added the Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 label Nov 1, 2022
    @raych1 raych1 added the Reviewed-ChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee request changes after review label Nov 3, 2022
    @raych1
    Copy link
    Member

    raych1 commented Nov 3, 2022

    @supriyajha-ms , please add headers to response in examples to fix model validation errors.

    @raych1
    Copy link
    Member

    raych1 commented Nov 14, 2022

    @supriyajha-ms , please add headers to response in examples to fix model validation errors.

    Talked offline, these errors will be fixed in separate PR.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Approved-BreakingChange DO NOT USE! OBSOLETE label. See https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-tools/issues/6374 Approved-ModelValidation CI-BreakingChange-Go CI-BreakingChange-JavaScript CI-FixRequiredOnFailure Network NewApiVersionRequired resource-manager Reviewed-ChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when assignee request changes after review
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    4 participants