Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(iot-service, shared): Add support for configuring http connection lease timeouts #1874
feat(iot-service, shared): Add support for configuring http connection lease timeouts #1874
Changes from all commits
02e7677
c38b1c1
743823b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
curious if you could have done:
while (handler.InnerHandler is DelegatingHandler delegatingHandler)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Possibly. I didn't want to alter this code more than I needed to though since it was copied from track 2 and is designed to mimic the behavior that we already had. I just wanted this method to accept the more generic HttpMessageHandler rather than a HttpClientHandler
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should only use
as
if you are unsure it is that type, because it will otherwise return null. When you are sure (and you are because of the check in the while loop), you should just cast (assertive).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. This code was copied from the track 2 folks, so I missed this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nicely written docs :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
netcoreapp1.0-2.0 won't send the messageHandler as a socket http handler, so this switch block won't be executed, but do you think excluding those versions in the if-def is in any way useful?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll make this if-def match the if-def I have where we decide to make this handler a SocketsHttpHandler vs HttpClientHandler to make this moot