Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better support for InOut bindings in scripts #107

Closed
brettsam opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Better support for InOut bindings in scripts #107

brettsam opened this issue Mar 16, 2016 · 3 comments
Milestone
Unknown

Comments

@brettsam
Copy link
Member

If you create an InOut binding, one IValueBinder is used for the In and one is used for the Out. Several of our Bindings rely on this being the same binder (there's some stored state). You can get to it from private reflection but we should look into a better solution.
@fabiocav
Copy link
Member

Related to #89

@christopheranderson christopheranderson added this to the backlog milestone Mar 17, 2016
@brettsam brettsam mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2016
Closed
@mathewc
Copy link
Member

mathewc commented Mar 22, 2016

I beleive this is a dupe of #49.

@mathewc mathewc closed this as completed Mar 22, 2016
@brettsam
Copy link
Member Author

Yup, looks the same.

maiqbal11 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2019
@ahmelsayed
README typo for functionapp init. Closes #107
6c21431
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Unknown
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@mathewc @brettsam @christopheranderson @fabiocav