-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 240
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: ACN PR Pipeline Security Feature Branch #2985
Conversation
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
b95f52d
to
2703f8c
Compare
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
1 similar comment
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
4e48340
to
66ef8aa
Compare
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
66ef8aa
to
c6e55fc
Compare
/azp run TriggerCompliantBuild |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like a lot of these files are renames, any reason behind that? And are the old files going to be deleted?
@chengch801214 - Yes, this is to prevent collisions with internal pipeline changes to this repo while the feature is being testing. Currently there are multiple workstreams touching these files and we cannot block the higher priority work. Eventually the old files will be deleted after we have confirmed that we have parity across the two versions and we have switched over to using the new pipeline for PR validation. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seeing as we are creating new files entirely now, maybe we should move them to .pipelines/devops/*
That way we know there is a clear separation between OB and standard yaml pipelines.
.pipelines/singletenancy/dualstack-overlay/dualstackoverlay-e2e.jobs.yaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@jpayne3506 The old files will eventually be deleted after the whole cycle has complete (merge this change -> validation/attain master parity -> merge changes -> add PR check to repo -> run checks side by side for a week -> deprecate old ACN PR Pipeline -> delete replaced files -> merge). It is much better if people have the visibility on these files. |
/azp run Azure Container Networking PR |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run Azure Container Networking PR |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run Azure Container Networking PR |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
Reason for Change:
Merges change for a PR branch for a OneBranch based pipeline build for Azure Container Networking PR pull request builds. This pipeline will live on the feature branch until the changes have been verified as in-parity, and secure.
Issue Fixed:
Fixes Component Governance alerts for migrating our github repos to use organization compliant builds.
Requirements:
Notes: