docs: update limitations in dualstack docs

[aramase]

Reason for Change:

Issue Fixed:

Requirements:

• uses conventional commit messages
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests
• tested upgrade from previous version

Notes:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #3727 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3727   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.16%   73.16%           
=======================================
  Files         147      147           
  Lines       25318    25318           
=======================================
  Hits        18525    18525           
  Misses       5655     5655           
  Partials     1138     1138           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e748713...46061cf. Read the comment docs.

[jsturtevant]

Should we add a message about windows support #3688?

[aramase]

Should we add a message about windows support #3688?

Dualstack support for windows is added only in 1.19 and I was thinking we can add a message for windows in the doc once 1.19 is released? WDYT?

The validation check needs to be removed only after the backport is complete, right?

[jsturtevant]

Sorry I wasn't clear. I wanted to add a note to make it clear that Windows is not supported at this time because it requires 1.19 and backport to 2004.

[aramase]

Sorry I wasn't clear. I wanted to add a note to make it clear that Windows is not supported at this time because it requires 1.19 and backport to 2004.

Ah, that makes sense. Let me add that.

[jsturtevant]

Thanks!

/lgtm

[jackfrancis]

/lgtm

[acs-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aramase, jackfrancis, jsturtevant

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jackfrancis,jsturtevant]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment