Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore!: Use ACIR bytecode directly in bb binaries #675

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kevaundray
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please provide a paragraph or two giving a summary of the change, including relevant motivation and context.

Checklist:

  • I have reviewed my diff in github, line by line.
  • Every change is related to the PR description.
  • The branch has been merged with/rebased against the head of its merge target.
  • There are no unexpected formatting changes, superfluous debug logs, or commented-out code.
  • There are no circuit changes, OR a cryptographer has been assigned for review.
  • New functions, classes, etc. have been documented according to the doxygen comment format. Classes and structs must have @brief describing the intended functionality.
  • If existing code has been modified, such documentation has been added or updated.
  • No superfluous include directives have been added.
  • I have linked to any issue(s) it resolves.
  • I'm happy for the PR to be merged at the reviewer's next convenience.

@kevaundray kevaundray marked this pull request as ready for review August 17, 2023 13:52
Copy link
Member

@TomAFrench TomAFrench left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM once the noir PR is in.

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ set -e

BB=$PWD/${BB:-../cpp/build/bin/bb}
CRS_PATH=~/.bb-crs
BRANCH=master
BRANCH=kw/save-bytecode
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
BRANCH=kw/save-bytecode
BRANCH=master

@TomAFrench
Copy link
Member

We should also mirror this in the aztec-packages repo.

@TomAFrench
Copy link
Member

Closing in favour of AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#1618

@TomAFrench TomAFrench closed this Aug 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants