Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find a more generic (type-agnostic) way to define private call args but still allow private call functions to be passed into test helper func #246

Closed
dbanks12 opened this issue Apr 13, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
refactor Refactoring

Comments

@dbanks12
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@dbanks12 dbanks12 added this to A3 Apr 13, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 converted this from a draft issue Apr 13, 2023
@dbanks12 dbanks12 changed the title Find a more generic (type-agnostic) way to define private call args but allow private call functions to be passed into test helper func Find a more generic (type-agnostic) way to define private call args but still allow private call functions to be passed into test helper func Apr 13, 2023
@iAmMichaelConnor
Copy link
Contributor

It might be ok for the args to all be field type - that's what the Noir Contract will be working with. If a user needs a different type, it's still all actually fields, behind the scenes.

@iAmMichaelConnor iAmMichaelConnor added the refactor Refactoring label Apr 13, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in A3 Jul 12, 2023
@iAmMichaelConnor iAmMichaelConnor removed this from A3 Jul 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor Refactoring
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants