-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(acir)!: Move is_recursive
flag to be part of the circuit definition
#4221
Merged
Merged
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
34 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
993cc52
move recursive flag onto the circuit itself rather than having it be …
vezenovm 51709d8
missed bberg files
vezenovm a746985
remove is_recursive flag and add recursive flag to AcirComposer
vezenovm 192beeb
use throw_or_abort
vezenovm a3a7800
remove is_recursive flag
vezenovm bc3843f
update dsl bberg tests to use new AcirFormat
vezenovm 3fd6edc
uncomment serde_reflection test
vezenovm 18532f1
Merge branch 'master' into mv/is-recursive-on-circuit
vezenovm 4c074be
make a separate test for recursive assert_statement
vezenovm 018f25f
update noir js to not distinguish between intermediate and final proofs
vezenovm 73975d1
update comment
vezenovm 3c67a55
bb js foramt
vezenovm 545e6f0
missed recursive flag in acir format test
vezenovm b37e972
remove unused flags
vezenovm 2eba28f
browser-test-app in acir_tests
vezenovm 0b5931c
move is_recursive_circuit to vkey
vezenovm c9d1629
remove old comment
vezenovm 847fa25
bring back test comment
vezenovm 91b2a16
remove old recursive_ field on acir composer
vezenovm d2a7e98
cleanup info
vezenovm 2cbeb9c
merge conflicts
vezenovm 3d4ff84
Merge branch 'master' into mv/is-recursive-on-circuit
vezenovm 4a99457
update dep for noir_js_backend_barretenberg
vezenovm 87459cf
docs updates after bootstrapping
vezenovm 07436ed
move back to 0.19.0
vezenovm a9b123c
resolve merge conflicts w/ master
vezenovm a706c47
Update barretenberg/cpp/src/barretenberg/proof_system/circuit_builder…
vezenovm c2abde7
remove floating false on GoblinUltraCircuitBuilder_
vezenovm 64375f4
slight format update
vezenovm bce2607
merge conflcits w/ master
vezenovm 6a70ef0
don't commit codegen'd docs
vezenovm 4266015
resolve merge conflicts w/ master
vezenovm 2a1b16b
regenerate bindings
kevaundray 11e7571
Empty-Commit
vezenovm File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I settled on this flag living on the composer as I didn't feel the need to thread it down to the builder. The builder is created when we a create a circuit anyway which is the same time this flag is set.EDIT: I realized that in order to specify whether a circuit is recursive friendly during verification without the circuit description we need the recursive flag to live on the verification key. I ended up putting
is_recursive_circuit
flag on the builder and setting a new field on the verification key when we compute the key.