-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Standalone calldata test #3842
Merged
Merged
Changes from 13 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
32ceb3a
call data read gate fctn
ledwards2225 342c5be
standalone calldata test
ledwards2225 949f87e
comment
ledwards2225 dbd0b49
make read return a value
ledwards2225 e480382
Merge branch 'master' into lde/calldata_test
ledwards2225 2cee342
test
ledwards2225 4907c07
Merge branch 'lde/calldata_test' of github.com:AztecProtocol/aztec-pa…
ledwards2225 791c5aa
naming fix
ledwards2225 0c2599c
revert back to create gate style function
ledwards2225 14af71e
fix comment
ledwards2225 8116609
another comment fix
ledwards2225 18d7319
Merge branch 'master' into lde/calldata_test
ledwards2225 2b5dae9
possible read counts workaround
ledwards2225 a95f573
new variable for lookup result plus TODO comments
ledwards2225 bbb2553
Merge branch 'master' into lde/calldata_test
ledwards2225 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the way it is right now, the verification key would change depending on read_index_values. If someone were to take this test and use databus based on this pattern it could be dangerous. Ideally we'd create a new variable with the same value here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated so that the witness used in the lookup is unique as we discussed offline