-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 266
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: new NoteProcessor works through all blocks #1404
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4f1b8a7
WIP
benesjan 67c3cde
cleanup
benesjan 55a0efb
fix: note processor
benesjan fa9ec25
refactor: using INITIAL_L2_BLOCK_NUM IN in RPC server
benesjan 54a3193
refactor: cleanup
benesjan 5fd8e73
fix: Fr overflow in FunctionL2Logs.random
benesjan dea49f3
feat: note processor catch up test
benesjan ae4f805
docs: minor improvements
benesjan File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@benesjan sorry for going back to a merged PR, but I think you may have a race condition here: if a
noteProcessor
is added on the first run ofwork
duringawait this.updateBlockInfoInBlockTxs(blockContexts)
, which happens after the note processors are notified but before updatingsynchedToBlock
, then it will be pushed tonoteProcessors
but will never get the notes from the first iteration.If the above is correct, maybe you can solve it with a flag
isStarted
that you set as soon asstart
is called, and check that instead ofsynchedToBlock
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think @spalladino is right. Perhaps a clean solution is to always add the note processor to
noteProcessorsToCatchUp
and haveworkNoteProcessorCatchUp
transfer it tonoteProcessors
in all scenarios.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@spalladino great catch! Will address