feat: blobs. #9302

MirandaWood · 2024-10-21T13:17:14Z

The Blobbening

It's happening and I can only apologise.

Follows #8955.

Intro

More detailed stuff below, but the major changes are:

Publish DA through blobs rather than calldata. This means:
- No more txs effects hashing
- Proving that our effects are included in a blob (see below for details) using base -> root rollup circuits
- Accumulating tx effects in a blob sponge (SpongeBlob)
- Building blocks by first passing a hint of how many tx effects the block will have
- Updating forge to handle blobs
- Tests for all the above

Major Issues

Things that we should resolve before merging:

Run times massively increased:
- This is largely because the nr code for blobs is written with the BigNum lib, which uses a lot of unconstrained code then a small amount of constrained code to verify results. Unfortunately this means we cannot simulate circuits containing blobs (currently block-root) using wasm or set nr tests to unconstrained because that causes a stack overflow in brillig.
- To avoid straight up failures, I've created nr tests which are not unconstrained (meaning rollup-lib tests take 10mins or so to run) and I've forced circuit simulation to run in native ACVM rather than wasm (adding around 1min to any tests that simulate block-root).
- Yes, there's more! All the above is happening while we only create one blob per block. This is definitely not enough space (we aim for 3 per block), but I imagine tripling the blob nr code would only cause more runtime issues.
~~Data retrieval~~ The below will be done in feat(blobs): Integrate beacon chain client/web2 blob getter #9101, and for now we use calldata just to keep the archiver working:
- The current (interim) solution is to still publish the same block body calldata as before, just so the archiver actually runs. This calldata is no longer verified with the txs effects hash, but is checked (in ts) against the known blob hash, so a mismatch will still throw.
- The actual blob contents will look different to the body calldata since we will be tightly packing effects and adding length markers before each section (like how log lengths work). I've added to/from methods to aid conversion in data-retrieval to use.
~~Blob verification precompile gas~~ Batching blob KZG proofs is being thought about (see Epic: Blobs #8955 for progression):
- The current approach to verify that the published blob matches the tx effects coming from the rollup is to call the point evaluation precompile for each blob. This costs 50k gas each time, so is not sustainable.
- We think it's possible to accumulate the KZG proofs used to validate blobs into one. Mike is thinking about this and whether it's doable using nr, so we can call the precompile once per epoch rather than 3 times per block.

General TODOs

Things I'm working on:

Moving from 1 to 3 blobs per block
- This will slow everything down massively so I'd prefer to solve the runtime issues before tackling this.
- It's also going to be relatively complex, because the base rollup will need code to fill from one of three SpongeBlob instances and will need to know how to 'jump' from one full blob to the next at any possible index. Hopefully this does not lead to a jump in gates.

Description

The general maths in nr and replicated across foundation/blob is described here.

Old DA Flow

From the base rollup to L1, the previous flow for publishing DA was:

Nr:

In the base rollup, take in all tx effects we wish to publish and sha256 hash them to a single value: tx_effects_hash
This value is propogated up the rollup to the next merge (or block-root) circuit
Each merge or block-root circuit simply sha256 hashes each 'child' tx_effects_hash from its left and right inputs
Eventually, at block-root, we have one value: txs_effects_hash which becomes part of the header's content commitment

Ts:

The txs_effects_hash is checked and propogated through the orchestrator and becomes part of the ts class L2Block in the header
The actual tx effects to publish become the L2Block's .body
The publisher sends the serialised block body and header to the L1 block propose function

Sol:

In propose, we decode the block body and header
The body is deconstructed per tx into its tx effects and then hashed using sha256, until we have N tx_effects_hashes (mimicing the calculation in the base rollup)
Each tx_effects_hash is then input as leaves to a wonky tree and hashed up to the root (mimicing the calculation from base to block-root), forming the final txs_effects_hash
This final value is checked to be equal to the one in the header's content commitment, then stored to be checked against for validating data availability
*Later, when verifying a rollup proof, we use the above header values as public inputs. If they do not match what came from the circuit, the verification fails.

*NB: With batch rollups, I've lost touch with what currently happens at verification and how we ensure the txs_effects_hash matches the one calculated in the rollup, so this might not be accurate.

New DA Flow

The new flow for publishing DA is:

Nr:

In the base rollup, we treat tx effects as we treat PartialStateReferences - injecting a hint to the start and end state we expect from processing this base's transaction
We take all the tx effects to publish and absorb them into the given start SpongeBlob state. We then check the result is the same as the given end state
Like with PartialStateReferences, each merge or block-root checks that the left input's end blob state is equal to the right input's start blob state
Eventually, at block-root, we check the above and that the left's start blob state was empty. Now we have a sponge which has absorbed, as a flat array, all the tx effects in the block we wish to publish
We inject the flat array of effects as a private input, along with the ts calculated blob commitment, and pass them and the sponge to the blob function
The blob function:
- Poseidon hashes the flat array of effects, and checks this matches the accumulated sponge when squeezed (this confirms that the flat array is indeed the same array of tx effects propogated from each base)
- Computes the challenge z by hashing this ^ hash with the blob commitment
- Evaluates the blob polynomial at z using the flat array of effects in the barycentric formula (more details on the engineering design link above), to return y
The block-root adds this triple (z, y, and commitment C) to a new array of BlobPublicInputs
*Like how we handle fees, each block-merge and root merges the left and right input arrays, so we end up with an array of each block's blob info

*NB: this will likely change to accumulating to a single set of values, rather than one per block, and is being worked on by Mike. The above also describes what happens for one blob per block for simplicity (it will actually be 3).

Ts:

The BlobPublicInputs are checked against the ts calculated blob for each block in the orchestrator
They form part of a serialised array of bytes called blobInput (plus the expected L1 blobHash and a ts generated KZG proof) sent to L1 to the propose function
The propose transaction is now a special 'blob transaction' where all the tx effects (the same flat array as dealt with in the rollup) are sent as a sidecar
*We also send the serialised block body, so the archiver can still read the data back until feat(blobs): Integrate beacon chain client/web2 blob getter #9101

*NB: this will change once we can read the blobs themselves from the beacon chain/some web2 client.

Sol:

In propose, instead of recalcating the txs_effects_hash, we send the blobInput to a new validateBlob function. *This function:
- Gathers the real blobHash from the EVM and checks it against the one in blobInput
- Calls the point evaluation precompile and checks that our z, y, and C indeed correspond to the blob we claim
We now have a verified link between the published blob and our blobInput, but still need to link this to our rollup circuit:
- Each set of BlobPublicInputs is extracted from the bytes array and stored against its block number
- When the root proof is verified, we reconstruct the array of BlobPublicInputs from the above stored values and use them in proof verification
- If any of the BlobPublicInputs are incorrect (equivalently, if any of the published blobs were incorrect), the proof verification will fail
To aid users/the archiver in checking their blob data matches a certain block, the EVM blobHash is been added to BlockLog once it has been verified by the precompile

*NB: As above, we will eventually call the precompile just once for many blobs with one set of BlobPublicInputs. This will still be used in verifying the root proof to ensure the tx effects match those from each base.

…st working

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/publisher/l1-publisher.ts

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

MirandaWood · 2024-11-05T14:50:16Z

noir-projects/noir-protocol-circuits/crates/rollup-lib/src/components.nr

    offset += 1;

    // TX FEE
-    tx_effects_hash_input[offset] = transaction_fee;
+    // TODO(Miranda): how many bytes do we expect tx fee to be? Using 29 for now


@ TMNT (or any) team: is there a restriction anywhere on the size of the tx fee?

Don't think there really is a limit, there is probably some sensible value, but as base fees might go up a lot in congestion for now would just keep it as is. You can essentially see it as just a more domain specific public state update.

iAmMichaelConnor

Amazing!
I think this is mergeable. @LeilaWang, @LHerskind what do you think?

The circuits look good (with well documented todos) (and we'll be updating them for batching of blobs soon anyway).
The smart contracts look good (with well documented todos) (and we know they're not optimised, because we'll be moving to batching of blobs soon anyway).
The typescript is passing tests.
The "boxes" tests have been failing on master for a while, so no need to fix those here.

Ship?

LHerskind

There is a bit of naming that should probably be updated around single or multiple blobs, e.g., blobHash vs blobsHash. For the cases where there are multiple, would prefer the blobsHash to be used consistently to make it simpler to follow.

The TxsDecoder should also be pretty unused after this so maybe it can be deleted along with it.

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T11:49:15Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

@@ -94,6 +98,9 @@ contract Rollup is EIP712("Aztec Rollup", "1"), Leonidas, IRollup, ITestRollup {
  //        Testing only. This should be removed eventually.
  uint256 private assumeProvenThroughBlockNumber;

+  // @note  Always true, exists to override to false for testing only


Is there an issue for getting rid of this again?

Not yet - made one here: #10147

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T11:49:52Z

l1-contracts/src/core/libraries/HeaderLib.sol

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import {Errors} from "@aztec/core/libraries/Errors.sol";
 *  | 0x0020                                                                           | 0x04         |   lastArchive.nextAvailableLeafIndex
 *  |                                                                                  |              |   ContentCommitment {
 *  | 0x0024                                                                           | 0x20         |     numTxs
- *  | 0x0044                                                                           | 0x20         |     txsEffectsHash
+ *  | 0x0044                                                                           | 0x20         |     blobHash


Thanks.
Quick question, should this not be blobsHash (multiple blobs).

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T11:59:59Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

   * @param  _proof - The proof to verify
   */
  function submitEpochRootProof(
    uint256 _epochSize,
    bytes32[7] calldata _args,
    bytes32[] calldata _fees,
-    bytes calldata _aggregationObject,
+    bytes calldata _blobPublicInputsAndAggregationObject, // having separate inputs here caused stack too deep


It is possible to get around this by using something similar to the ProposeArgs. Might be worth considering for the sake of your sanity 🫡

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T12:09:29Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

@@ -311,6 +321,10 @@ contract Rollup is EIP712("Aztec Rollup", "1"), Leonidas, IRollup, ITestRollup {
      }
    }

+    for (uint256 i = 0; i < _epochSize; i++) {
+      // free up gas (hopefully)


Unless you are submitting the proof in the same transaction as you set the values originally you will be paying extra to do this. Cleaning it here is essentially doing like gas-tokens did back in the days before pricing was changed.
Would remove.

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T12:10:32Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

-    // Which we are checking in the `_validateHeader` call below.
-    bytes32 txsEffectsHash = TxsDecoder.decode(_body);
+    // Since an invalid blob hash here would fail the consensus checks of
+    // the header, the `blobInput` is implicitly accepted by consensus as well.


LHerskind · 2024-11-22T12:11:08Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

   */
  function getEpochProofPublicInputs(
    uint256 _epochSize,
    bytes32[7] calldata _args,
    bytes32[] calldata _fees,
-    bytes calldata _aggregationObject
+    bytes calldata _blobPublicInputsAndAggregationObject // having separate inputs here caused stack too deep


As earlier, using a struct can be used to work around this while keeping the readability.

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T12:12:11Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

+            bytes32(_blobPublicInputsAndAggregationObject[blobOffset:blobOffset += 32])
+          );
+          // To fit into 2 fields, the commitment is split into 31 and 17 byte numbers
+          // TODO: The below left pads, possibly inefficiently


Is there an issue for this? You don't need to make the work, but if you can add an issue and throw it into #7820 that would be neat 👍

Made one, thanks! #10148

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T12:13:14Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

+        _signatures: _signatures,
+        _digest: digest,
+        _currentTime: Timestamp.wrap(block.timestamp),
+        _blobHash: blobsHash,


The _blobHash should probably also be blobsHash (multiple)

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T12:13:45Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

@@ -856,14 +934,12 @@ contract Rollup is EIP712("Aztec Rollup", "1"), Leonidas, IRollup, ITestRollup {
    SignatureLib.Signature[] memory _signatures,
    bytes32 _digest,
    Timestamp _currentTime,
-    bytes32 _txEffectsHash,
+    bytes32 _blobHash,


Same down here, there is a bunch of blobHash that should probably be blobsHash.

LHerskind

Lets get it merged before the fees changes goes in.

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T16:21:39Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

-   * @param  _args - Array of public inputs to the proof (previousArchive, endArchive, previousBlockHash, endBlockHash, endTimestamp, outHash, proverId)
-   * @param  _fees - Array of recipient-value pairs with fees to be distributed for the epoch
-   * @param  _blobPublicInputsAndAggregationObject - The aggregation object and blob PIs for the proof
+   * @param  _submitArgs - Struct for constructing PIs which has:


What is PIs? Public Inputs? Personal Information

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T16:25:58Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

@@ -402,19 +397,19 @@ contract Rollup is EIP712("Aztec Rollup", "1"), Leonidas, IRollup, ITestRollup {
   * @param _signatures - The signatures to validate
   * @param _digest - The digest to validate
   * @param _currentTime - The current time
-   * @param _blobHash - The EVM blob hash for this block
+   * @param _blobsHash - The EVM blob hash for this block


The EVM blob hash for this block is not correct anymore

LHerskind · 2024-11-22T16:26:56Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

-   * @param  _args - Array of public inputs to the proof (previousArchive, endArchive, previousBlockHash, endBlockHash, endTimestamp, outHash, proverId)
-   * @param  _fees - Array of recipient-value pairs with fees to be distributed for the epoch
-   * @param  _blobPublicInputsAndAggregationObject - The aggregation object and blob PIs for the proof
+   * @param  _submitArgs - Struct for constructing PIs which has:


Anther PIs, think it is public inputs, but would be easier to follow if written out

LHerskind · 2024-11-25T16:54:46Z

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol

-    uint256 endBlockNumber = previousBlockNumber + _epochSize;
-
+    uint256 endBlockNumber = previousBlockNumber + _submitArgs.epochSize;
+    bytes32[7] memory args = _submitArgs.args;


* master: (106 commits) feat: blobs. (#9302) chore(avm): operands reordering (#10182) feat: UltraRollupRecursiveFlavor (#10088) feat: one liner for nodes to join rough-rhino (#10168) feat!: rename sharedimmutable methods (#10164) chore(master): Release 0.64.0 (#10043) feat: e2e metrics reporting (#9776) chore: fix pool metrics (#9652) chore: Initial draft of testnet-runbook (#10085) feat: Improved data storage metrics (#10020) chore: Remove handling of duplicates from the note hash tree (#10016) fix: add curl to aztec nargo container (#10173) fix: Revert "feat: integrate base fee computation into rollup" (#10166) feat!: rename SharedMutable methods (#10165) git subrepo push --branch=master noir-projects/aztec-nr git_subrepo.sh: Fix parent in .gitrepo file. [skip ci] chore: replace relative paths to noir-protocol-circuits git subrepo push --branch=master barretenberg feat: sync tags as sender (#10071) feat: integrate base fee computation into rollup (#10076) ...

This reverts commit 03b7e0e.

This reverts commit 03b7e0e. (womp womp)

This reverts commit a415f65.

* master: (64 commits) fix: docker compose aztec up fix (#10197) fix: aztec-nargo curl in the earthfile also (#10199) chore: fix devbox (#10201) chore: misc cleanup (#10194) fix: release l1-contracts (#10095) git subrepo push --branch=master noir-projects/aztec-nr git_subrepo.sh: Fix parent in .gitrepo file. [skip ci] chore: replace relative paths to noir-protocol-circuits git subrepo push --branch=master barretenberg feat: Origin tags implemented in biggroup (#10002) fix: Revert "feat: blobs. (#9302)" (#10187) feat!: remove SharedImmutable (#10183) fix(bb.js): don't minify bb.js - webpack config (#10170) feat: blobs. (#9302) chore(avm): operands reordering (#10182) feat: UltraRollupRecursiveFlavor (#10088) feat: one liner for nodes to join rough-rhino (#10168) feat!: rename sharedimmutable methods (#10164) chore(master): Release 0.64.0 (#10043) feat: e2e metrics reporting (#9776) ...

🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- <details><summary>aztec-package: 0.65.0</summary> ## [0.65.0](aztec-package-v0.64.0...aztec-package-v0.65.0) (2024-11-26) ### Features * **avm:** New public inputs witgen ([#10179](#10179)) ([ac8f13e](ac8f13e)) </details> <details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.65.0</summary> ## [0.65.0](barretenberg.js-v0.64.0...barretenberg.js-v0.65.0) (2024-11-26) ### Bug Fixes * **bb.js:** Don't minify bb.js - webpack config ([#10170](#10170)) ([6e7fae7](6e7fae7)) </details> <details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.65.0</summary> ## [0.65.0](aztec-packages-v0.64.0...aztec-packages-v0.65.0) (2024-11-26) ### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES * remove SharedImmutable ([#10183](#10183)) * rename sharedimmutable methods ([#10164](#10164)) ### Features * **avm:** New public inputs witgen ([#10179](#10179)) ([ac8f13e](ac8f13e)) * Blobs. ([#9302](#9302)) ([03b7e0e](03b7e0e)) * One liner for nodes to join rough-rhino ([#10168](#10168)) ([3a425e9](3a425e9)) * Origin tags implemented in biggroup ([#10002](#10002)) ([c8696b1](c8696b1)) * Remove SharedImmutable ([#10183](#10183)) ([a9f3b5f](a9f3b5f)) * Rename sharedimmutable methods ([#10164](#10164)) ([ef7cd86](ef7cd86)) * UltraRollupRecursiveFlavor ([#10088](#10088)) ([4418ef2](4418ef2)) ### Bug Fixes * Aztec-nargo curl in the earthfile also ([#10199](#10199)) ([985a678](985a678)) * **bb.js:** Don't minify bb.js - webpack config ([#10170](#10170)) ([6e7fae7](6e7fae7)) * Docker compose aztec up fix ([#10197](#10197)) ([d7ae959](d7ae959)) * Increase test timeouts ([#10205](#10205)) ([195aa3d](195aa3d)) * Release l1-contracts ([#10095](#10095)) ([29f0d7a](29f0d7a)) * Revert "feat: blobs. ([#9302](#9302))" ([#10187](#10187)) ([a415f65](a415f65)) ### Miscellaneous * Added ref to env variables ([#10193](#10193)) ([b51fc43](b51fc43)) * **avm:** Operands reordering ([#10182](#10182)) ([69bdf4f](69bdf4f)), closes [#10136](#10136) * Fix devbox ([#10201](#10201)) ([323eaee](323eaee)) * Misc cleanup ([#10194](#10194)) ([dd01417](dd01417)) * Reinstate docs-preview, fix doc publish ([#10213](#10213)) ([ed9a0e3](ed9a0e3)) * Replace relative paths to noir-protocol-circuits ([1650446](1650446)) </details> <details><summary>barretenberg: 0.65.0</summary> ## [0.65.0](barretenberg-v0.64.0...barretenberg-v0.65.0) (2024-11-26) ### Features * **avm:** New public inputs witgen ([#10179](#10179)) ([ac8f13e](ac8f13e)) * Origin tags implemented in biggroup ([#10002](#10002)) ([c8696b1](c8696b1)) * UltraRollupRecursiveFlavor ([#10088](#10088)) ([4418ef2](4418ef2)) ### Miscellaneous * **avm:** Operands reordering ([#10182](#10182)) ([69bdf4f](69bdf4f)), closes [#10136](#10136) </details> --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Electric boogaloo (cont. of #9302) This reverts commit a415f65. --------- Co-authored-by: Tom French <[email protected]>

MirandaWood added 11 commits September 25, 2024 16:56

feat: first blobs commit - ts + nr only - overflow err

d2544a9

feat: hash blob in chunks, force native sim for block-root

9cefc9a

feat: add ts blob class, use real blob in rollup, more tests

df93cf5

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into mw/blob-circuit

c5539eb

feat: post merge fixes, add sponge to epoch prover, cleanup

5e92023

fix: more merge fixes + cleanup

1d17855

feat: purge txseffectshash from nr and ts

aff5e35

feat: publish blobs to L1, verify, test, a lot of cleanup

dfe722b

chore: fmt, test refactors + fixes

bc0678c

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into mw/blob-circuit

ad090f6

fix: multiple post merge fixes, refactor err logging, prover-coord te…

bf98bbc

…st working

MirandaWood commented Oct 24, 2024

View reviewed changes

yarn-project/sequencer-client/src/publisher/l1-publisher.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

MirandaWood added 14 commits October 24, 2024 13:05

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into mw/blob-circuit

2cd7570

feat: reinstate bignum code after fix, post merge fixes and fmt

8a8dcab

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into mw/blob-circuit

cc01696

chore: revert e2e prover coord fix in favour of master

6f92b1f

feat: added custom existing sponge absorber to save gates, fmt

233d3fd

feat: tightly pack blobs, encode and decode with prefixes

7c1749d

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into mw/blob-circuit

247a49d

chore: post merge fixes, formatting

8f3d10f

fix: apply fix for public processor state (PR9634)

20674cf

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into mw/blob-circuit

38725f8

chore: update fixtures + fmt

77dcf8e

feat: add blob check override, simulate txs

580b1b2

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin' into mw/blob-circuit

2166780

feat: update bignum, fmt, comments, small fixes

99ac96e

MirandaWood requested review from LeilaWang and iAmMichaelConnor November 5, 2024 14:38

MirandaWood commented Nov 5, 2024

View reviewed changes

l1-contracts/src/core/Rollup.sol Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

MirandaWood commented Nov 5, 2024

View reviewed changes

MirandaWood added 2 commits November 21, 2024 16:49

chore: increase timeouts + fmt

21d23f3

feat: add back c-kzg (otherwise v slow), remove fns for browser

893f1ec

iAmMichaelConnor approved these changes Nov 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

MirandaWood added 3 commits November 22, 2024 09:46

chore: revert some timeouts, re add test

02abb31

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into mw/blob-circuit

c78d8ec

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into mw/blob-circuit

20ef3c1

LHerskind reviewed Nov 22, 2024

View reviewed changes

MirandaWood added 2 commits November 22, 2024 13:48

feat: address comments, renaming etc

20e44cc

feat: remove txsdecoder

e66454d

MirandaWood requested a review from LHerskind November 22, 2024 14:35

MirandaWood added 2 commits November 22, 2024 19:11

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into mw/blob-circuit

6b82d25

chore: post merge fix w/ sequencer changes

b787de6

MirandaWood mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2024

Re-enable e2e_epochs test #10177

Closed

chore: disable e2e_epoch due to teardown timeout

f76eaf6

LeilaWang approved these changes Nov 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

LHerskind approved these changes Nov 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

Maddiaa0 approved these changes Nov 25, 2024

View reviewed changes

MirandaWood merged commit 03b7e0e into master Nov 25, 2024
101 checks passed

MirandaWood deleted the mw/blob-circuit branch November 25, 2024 19:15

AztecBot mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2024

chore(master): Release 0.65.0 #10181

Merged

MirandaWood added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024

Revert "feat: blobs. (#9302)"

e09901c

This reverts commit 03b7e0e.

ludamad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024

fix: Revert "feat: blobs. (#9302)" (#10187)

a415f65

This reverts commit 03b7e0e. (womp womp)

MirandaWood added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024

Revert "fix: Revert "feat: blobs. (#9302)" (#10187)"

b4033be

This reverts commit a415f65.

MirandaWood mentioned this pull request Nov 25, 2024

feat: blobs 2. #10188

Merged

MirandaWood mentioned this pull request Nov 30, 2024

feat(blobs): Remove ts blob oracle #10323

Open

charlielye pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2024

feat: blobs 2. (#10188)

d0a4b2f

Electric boogaloo (cont. of #9302) This reverts commit a415f65. --------- Co-authored-by: Tom French <[email protected]>

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat: blobs. #9302

feat: blobs. #9302

MirandaWood commented Oct 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading

MirandaWood Nov 5, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

iAmMichaelConnor left a comment •

edited

Loading

LHerskind left a comment

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

MirandaWood Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

MirandaWood Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind left a comment

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 22, 2024

LHerskind Nov 25, 2024

feat: blobs. #9302

feat: blobs. #9302

Conversation

MirandaWood commented Oct 21, 2024 • edited Loading

The Blobbening

Intro

Major Issues

General TODOs

Description

Old DA Flow

New DA Flow

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

iAmMichaelConnor left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

LHerskind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

LHerskind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

MirandaWood commented Oct 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading

iAmMichaelConnor left a comment •

edited

Loading