-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: barretenberg => bb namespace shortening #4066
Conversation
Benchmark resultsMetrics with a significant change:
Detailed resultsAll benchmarks are run on txs on the This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here. Values are compared against data from master at commit L2 block published to L1Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.
L2 chain processingEach column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.
Circuits statsStats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every circuit run across all benchmarks.
Tree insertion statsThe duration to insert a fixed batch of leaves into each tree type.
MiscellaneousTransaction sizes based on how many contracts are deployed in the tx.
Transaction processing duration by data writes.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🙏
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ using Composer = proof_system::plonk::StandardComposer; | |||
|
|||
void generate_test_plonk_circuit(Builder& builder, size_t num_gates) | |||
{ | |||
plonk::stdlib::field_t a(plonk::stdlib::witness_t(&builder, barretenberg::fr::random_element())); | |||
plonk::stdlib::field_t b(plonk::stdlib::witness_t(&builder, barretenberg::fr::random_element())); | |||
plonk::stdlib::field_t a(plonk::stdlib::witness_t(&builder, bb::fr::random_element())); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As a follow-on: let's make this bb::bn254::fr
, bb::grumpkin::fr
etc
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ | |||
namespace proof_system::honk { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As a follow-on: we should put everything in bb namespace and remove unneeded qualifications.
@@ -70,6 +70,6 @@ class Bn254FrParams { | |||
|
|||
using fr = field<Bn254FrParams>; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm personally in favor of calling this Fr
but perhaps we should put it to a vote
This is the first phase of namespace refactors planned. Just renames barretenberg=>bb. The followups will mostly collapse long namespaces, e.g. bb::plonk::crypto::aes128 => bb::crypto --------- Co-authored-by: ludamad <[email protected]>
This is the first phase of namespace refactors planned. Just renames barretenberg=>bb.
The followups will mostly collapse long namespaces, e.g. bb::plonk::crypto::aes128 => bb::crypto