Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: honk sumcheck performance #2925

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Oct 19, 2023
Merged

fix: honk sumcheck performance #2925

merged 15 commits into from
Oct 19, 2023

Conversation

ludamad
Copy link
Collaborator

@ludamad ludamad commented Oct 19, 2023

Parallelizing sumcheck partially_evaluate
Before
image
After
image
(note, when we see parallel_for_mutex_pool in the flamegraph it's some parallel_for operation but the details are aggregated in different threads)

@ludamad ludamad force-pushed the feat/better-profiling branch from df35cd9 to 6c0d8ae Compare October 19, 2023 01:27
@ludamad ludamad force-pushed the feat/better-profiling branch from cfcec5e to 60fd533 Compare October 19, 2023 01:32
@ludamad ludamad changed the title feat: better profiling feat: sumcheck performance Oct 19, 2023
@ludamad ludamad changed the title feat: sumcheck performance fix: sumcheck performance Oct 19, 2023
@ludamad ludamad changed the title fix: sumcheck performance fix: honk sumcheck performance Oct 19, 2023
@AztecBot
Copy link
Collaborator

AztecBot commented Oct 19, 2023

Benchmark results

Metrics with a significant change:

  • note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms (10): 240 (+58%)
Detailed results

All benchmarks are run on txs on the Benchmarking contract on the repository. Each tx consists of a batch call to create_note and increment_balance, which guarantees that each tx has a private call, a nested private call, a public call, and a nested public call, as well as an emitted private note, an unencrypted log, and public storage read and write.

This benchmark source data is available in JSON format on S3 here.

Values are compared against data from master at commit db3fa62e and shown if the difference exceeds 1%.

L2 block published to L1

Each column represents the number of txs on an L2 block published to L1.

Metric 8 txs 32 txs 128 txs
l1_rollup_calldata_size_in_bytes 45,444 179,588 716,132
l1_rollup_calldata_gas 222,972 868,160 3,449,744
l1_rollup_execution_gas 842,059 3,595,268 22,205,113
l2_block_processing_time_in_ms 1,025 3,825 (-2%) 15,198 (-1%)
note_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 334 (-1%) 1,004 (-4%) 3,912 (-1%)
note_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms 38.0 (-3%) 108 137
l2_block_building_time_in_ms 8,918 35,707 156,601
l2_block_rollup_simulation_time_in_ms 6,605 (+1%) 26,534 (+1%) 104,791
l2_block_public_tx_process_time_in_ms 2,274 (-1%) 9,054 (-3%) 51,158 (-1%)

L2 chain processing

Each column represents the number of blocks on the L2 chain where each block has 16 txs.

Metric 5 blocks 10 blocks
node_history_sync_time_in_ms 11,462 (-6%) 21,710 (-1%)
note_history_successful_decrypting_time_in_ms 2,357 (-8%) 4,624 (-4%)
note_history_trial_decrypting_time_in_ms 123 ⚠️ 240 (+58%)
node_database_size_in_bytes 1,662,889 1,201,069
pxe_database_size_in_bytes 27,188 54,187

Circuits stats

Stats on running time and I/O sizes collected for every circuit run across all benchmarks.

Circuit circuit_simulation_time_in_ms circuit_input_size_in_bytes circuit_output_size_in_bytes
private-kernel-init 46.4 (-3%) 61,697 18,841
private-kernel-ordering 23.3 (-3%) 24,233 8,089
base-rollup 850 (-1%) 639,797 811
root-rollup 37.7 (-1%) 4,072 1,097
private-kernel-inner 41.3 (-6%) 81,504 18,841
public-kernel-private-input 47.4 (-1%) 41,455 18,841
public-kernel-non-first-iteration 30.5 (-4%) 41,497 18,841
merge-rollup 0.957 (+18%) 2,592 873

Miscellaneous

Transaction sizes based on how many contracts are deployed in the tx.

Metric 0 deployed contracts 1 deployed contracts
tx_size_in_bytes 8,723 27,508

Copy link
Contributor

@codygunton codygunton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, I thought someone already did this, but it seems they didn't.

@ledwards2225 set up some scripts earlier this year to compare benchmarks of feature branches against benchmarks of master. There is also a script to compare UltraHonk vs. UltraPlonk performance for a feature branch. I updated those in the current and pushed commits (note that I had to make some local commits to master to get this to work).

Here are the changes for ultra_honk_bench before and after your change:

Benchmark                                                               Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
construct_proof_ultra/sha256/10/repeats:1                            -0.5978         -0.6333           707           284           641           235
construct_proof_ultra/keccak/10/repeats:1                            -0.3875         -0.4344          1378           844          1205           681
construct_proof_ultra/ecdsa_verification/10/repeats:1                -0.3625         -0.4520          2566          1636          2315          1269
construct_proof_ultra/merkle_membership/10/repeats:1                 -0.2672         -0.3287           274           201           241           162
OVERALL_GEOMEAN                                                      -0.4176         -0.4744             1             1             1             0

Here is UltraHonk vs UltraPlonk for your branch:

Benchmark                                                               Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
construct_proof_ultra/sha256/10/repeats:1                            -0.8137         -0.8334          1559           290          1454           242
construct_proof_ultra/keccak/10/repeats:1                            -0.4178         -0.4081          1433           834          1124           665
construct_proof_ultra/ecdsa_verification/10/repeats:1                -0.4736         -0.4704          3049          1605          2322          1230
construct_proof_ultra/merkle_membership/10/repeats:1                 -0.2946         -0.3059           282           199           237           165
OVERALL_GEOMEAN                                                      -0.5520         -0.5636             1             1             1             0

and, for reference, this is UltraHonk vs UltraPlonk in master

Benchmark                                                               Time             CPU      Time Old      Time New       CPU Old       CPU New
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
construct_proof_ultra/sha256/10/repeats:1                            -0.5263         -0.5283          1539           729          1409           665
construct_proof_ultra/keccak/10/repeats:1                            +0.0840         +0.2157          1397          1515          1094          1330
construct_proof_ultra/ecdsa_verification/10/repeats:1                +0.0898         +0.2421          2497          2721          1911          2374
construct_proof_ultra/merkle_membership/10/repeats:1                 +0.0318         +0.0838           278           287           234           254
OVERALL_GEOMEAN                                                      -0.1283         -0.0626             1             1             1             1

@ludamad ludamad merged commit 5fbfe6e into master Oct 19, 2023
2 checks passed
@ludamad ludamad deleted the feat/better-profiling branch October 19, 2023 13:31
@lucasxia01
Copy link
Contributor

and, for reference, this is UltraHonk vs UltraHonk in master

Did you mean UltraHonk vs UltraPlonk in master?

rahul-kothari pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.10.0</summary>

##
[0.10.0](aztec-packages-v0.9.0...aztec-packages-v0.10.0)
(2023-10-24)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* Emitting encrypted log by default
([#2926](#2926))

### Features

* Added register-account command to cli
([#2980](#2980))
([0977a90](0977a90))
* **docs:** Fix portals tutorial formatting
([#2929](#2929))
([ab19b67](ab19b67))
* Emitting encrypted log by default
([#2926](#2926))
([1ea2d4f](1ea2d4f)),
closes
[#2912](#2912)
* Goblin translator non-native field relation (Goblin Translator part 6)
([#2871](#2871))
([c4d8d96](c4d8d96))
* Honk profiling by pass, tsan preset
([#2982](#2982))
([a1592fd](a1592fd))
* Incorporate docs feedback and add "intermediate" level intros to some
pages
([#2598](#2598))
([78f9f52](78f9f52))
* Nuking `Pokeable` contract
([#2939](#2939))
([583d6fb](583d6fb))
* Protogalaxy Combiner
([#2436](#2436))
([a60c70d](a60c70d))
* Protogalaxy perturbator!
([#2624](#2624))
([509dee6](509dee6))
* Refactor pedersen hash standard
([#2592](#2592))
([3085676](3085676))
* Widget benchmarking
([#2897](#2897))
([0e927e9](0e927e9))


### Bug Fixes

* Add @jest/types to box deps
([#2903](#2903))
([db3fa62](db3fa62))
* Add lint rule for focused tests
([#2901](#2901))
([fd1a1a8](fd1a1a8))
* Avoid tsc OOM by unignoring an old contract artifact
([#2932](#2932))
([7310600](7310600))
* Bad it.only in tests
([#2900](#2900))
([a1f3af1](a1f3af1))
* Boxes boostrap dont use ts-node directly and add .prettierignore
([#2890](#2890))
([a3b1804](a3b1804))
* Confusing "Unknown complete address" error
([#2967](#2967))
([3a8f54a](3a8f54a))
* Force jest to quit, otherwise CI can rack up to 3hrs of credits per
job.
([#2899](#2899))
([ba2f671](ba2f671))
* Honk sumcheck performance
([#2925](#2925))
([5fbfe6e](5fbfe6e))
* Pending commitments contract using the wrong number of arguments
([#2959](#2959))
([655c322](655c322))
* Prettierignore in boxes
([#2902](#2902))
([8f7a200](8f7a200))
* Randomness in `AddressNote`
([#2965](#2965))
([4dc49a9](4dc49a9))
* Yarn lock
([#2923](#2923))
([7042bc6](7042bc6))


### Miscellaneous

* `Private Data Tree` --&gt; `Note Hash Tree`
([#2945](#2945))
([abaec9c](abaec9c)),
closes
[#2906](#2906)
* Apply hash abstraction over aztec-nr
([#2958](#2958))
([52f01ae](52f01ae))
* **docs:** Add Singleton and ImmutableSingleton `view_note` methods
([#2934](#2934))
([c1497f8](c1497f8))
* Fix box frontend styling
([#2919](#2919))
([7e9e8cc](7e9e8cc))
* Less noisy benchmark reports
([#2916](#2916))
([0df166c](0df166c))
* Remove unused nix files
([#2933](#2933))
([3174f84](3174f84))
* Run all e2e tests against sandbox
([#2891](#2891))
([6c4e26c](6c4e26c))
* Token box copies noir source files from noir-contracts on bootstrap
([#2940](#2940))
([a467b96](a467b96))


### Documentation

* Fix: update cheat codes to connect to ethRpcUrl
([#2922](#2922))
([4ffe9be](4ffe9be))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.10.0</summary>

##
[0.10.0](barretenberg.js-v0.9.0...barretenberg.js-v0.10.0)
(2023-10-24)


### Features

* Refactor pedersen hash standard
([#2592](#2592))
([3085676](3085676))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.10.0</summary>

##
[0.10.0](barretenberg-v0.9.0...barretenberg-v0.10.0)
(2023-10-24)


### Features

* Goblin translator non-native field relation (Goblin Translator part 6)
([#2871](#2871))
([c4d8d96](c4d8d96))
* Honk profiling by pass, tsan preset
([#2982](#2982))
([a1592fd](a1592fd))
* Protogalaxy Combiner
([#2436](#2436))
([a60c70d](a60c70d))
* Protogalaxy perturbator!
([#2624](#2624))
([509dee6](509dee6))
* Refactor pedersen hash standard
([#2592](#2592))
([3085676](3085676))
* Widget benchmarking
([#2897](#2897))
([0e927e9](0e927e9))


### Bug Fixes

* Honk sumcheck performance
([#2925](#2925))
([5fbfe6e](5fbfe6e))


### Miscellaneous

* Remove unused nix files
([#2933](#2933))
([3174f84](3174f84))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
AztecBot added a commit to AztecProtocol/barretenberg that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


<details><summary>aztec-packages: 0.10.0</summary>

##
[0.10.0](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@aztec-packages-v0.9.0...aztec-packages-v0.10.0)
(2023-10-24)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* Emitting encrypted log by default
([#2926](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2926))

### Features

* Added register-account command to cli
([#2980](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2980))
([0977a90](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0977a90))
* **docs:** Fix portals tutorial formatting
([#2929](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2929))
([ab19b67](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@ab19b67))
* Emitting encrypted log by default
([#2926](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2926))
([1ea2d4f](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@1ea2d4f)),
closes
[#2912](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2912)
* Goblin translator non-native field relation (Goblin Translator part 6)
([#2871](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2871))
([c4d8d96](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c4d8d96))
* Honk profiling by pass, tsan preset
([#2982](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2982))
([a1592fd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a1592fd))
* Incorporate docs feedback and add "intermediate" level intros to some
pages
([#2598](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2598))
([78f9f52](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@78f9f52))
* Nuking `Pokeable` contract
([#2939](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2939))
([583d6fb](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@583d6fb))
* Protogalaxy Combiner
([#2436](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2436))
([a60c70d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a60c70d))
* Protogalaxy perturbator!
([#2624](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2624))
([509dee6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@509dee6))
* Refactor pedersen hash standard
([#2592](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2592))
([3085676](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3085676))
* Widget benchmarking
([#2897](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2897))
([0e927e9](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0e927e9))


### Bug Fixes

* Add @jest/types to box deps
([#2903](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2903))
([db3fa62](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@db3fa62))
* Add lint rule for focused tests
([#2901](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2901))
([fd1a1a8](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@fd1a1a8))
* Avoid tsc OOM by unignoring an old contract artifact
([#2932](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2932))
([7310600](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@7310600))
* Bad it.only in tests
([#2900](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2900))
([a1f3af1](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a1f3af1))
* Boxes boostrap dont use ts-node directly and add .prettierignore
([#2890](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2890))
([a3b1804](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a3b1804))
* Confusing "Unknown complete address" error
([#2967](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2967))
([3a8f54a](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3a8f54a))
* Force jest to quit, otherwise CI can rack up to 3hrs of credits per
job.
([#2899](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2899))
([ba2f671](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@ba2f671))
* Honk sumcheck performance
([#2925](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2925))
([5fbfe6e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@5fbfe6e))
* Pending commitments contract using the wrong number of arguments
([#2959](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2959))
([655c322](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@655c322))
* Prettierignore in boxes
([#2902](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2902))
([8f7a200](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@8f7a200))
* Randomness in `AddressNote`
([#2965](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2965))
([4dc49a9](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4dc49a9))
* Yarn lock
([#2923](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2923))
([7042bc6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@7042bc6))


### Miscellaneous

* `Private Data Tree` --&gt; `Note Hash Tree`
([#2945](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2945))
([abaec9c](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@abaec9c)),
closes
[#2906](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2906)
* Apply hash abstraction over aztec-nr
([#2958](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2958))
([52f01ae](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@52f01ae))
* **docs:** Add Singleton and ImmutableSingleton `view_note` methods
([#2934](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2934))
([c1497f8](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c1497f8))
* Fix box frontend styling
([#2919](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2919))
([7e9e8cc](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@7e9e8cc))
* Less noisy benchmark reports
([#2916](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2916))
([0df166c](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0df166c))
* Remove unused nix files
([#2933](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2933))
([3174f84](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3174f84))
* Run all e2e tests against sandbox
([#2891](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2891))
([6c4e26c](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@6c4e26c))
* Token box copies noir source files from noir-contracts on bootstrap
([#2940](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2940))
([a467b96](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a467b96))


### Documentation

* Fix: update cheat codes to connect to ethRpcUrl
([#2922](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2922))
([4ffe9be](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@4ffe9be))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg.js: 0.10.0</summary>

##
[0.10.0](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg.js-v0.9.0...barretenberg.js-v0.10.0)
(2023-10-24)


### Features

* Refactor pedersen hash standard
([#2592](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2592))
([3085676](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3085676))
</details>

<details><summary>barretenberg: 0.10.0</summary>

##
[0.10.0](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@barretenberg-v0.9.0...barretenberg-v0.10.0)
(2023-10-24)


### Features

* Goblin translator non-native field relation (Goblin Translator part 6)
([#2871](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2871))
([c4d8d96](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@c4d8d96))
* Honk profiling by pass, tsan preset
([#2982](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2982))
([a1592fd](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a1592fd))
* Protogalaxy Combiner
([#2436](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2436))
([a60c70d](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@a60c70d))
* Protogalaxy perturbator!
([#2624](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2624))
([509dee6](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@509dee6))
* Refactor pedersen hash standard
([#2592](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2592))
([3085676](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3085676))
* Widget benchmarking
([#2897](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2897))
([0e927e9](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@0e927e9))


### Bug Fixes

* Honk sumcheck performance
([#2925](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2925))
([5fbfe6e](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@5fbfe6e))


### Miscellaneous

* Remove unused nix files
([#2933](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages#2933))
([3174f84](AztecProtocol/aztec-packages@3174f84))
</details>

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants